• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器依从性:成本效益分析。

Improving inhaler adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2014 Jun 14;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-66.

DOI:10.1186/1465-9921-15-66
PMID:24929799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4067522/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The PHARMACOP-intervention significantly improved medication adherence and inhalation technique for patients with COPD compared with usual care. This study aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

An economic analysis was performed from the Belgian healthcare payer's perspective. A Markov model was constructed in which a representative group of patients with COPD (mean age of 70 years, 66% male, 43% current smokers and mean Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second of % predicted of 50), was followed for either receiving the 3-month PHARMACOP-intervention or usual care. Three types of costs were calculated: intervention costs, medication costs and exacerbation costs. Outcome measures included the number of hospital-treated exacerbations, cost per prevented hospital-treated exacerbation and cost per Quality Adjusted Life-Year. Follow-up was 1 year in the basecase analysis. Sensitivity and scenario analyses (including long-term follow-up) were performed to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

In the basecase analysis, the average overall costs per patient for the PHARMACOP-intervention and usual care were €2,221 and €2,448, respectively within the 1-year time horizon. This reflects cost savings of €227 for the PHARMACOP-intervention. The PHARMACOP-intervention resulted in the prevention of 0.07 hospital-treated exacerbations per patient (0.177 for PHARMACOP versus 0.244 for usual care). Results showed robust cost-savings in various sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of current pharmacotherapy (e.g. close monitoring of inhalation technique and medication adherence) has been shown to be cost-saving and should be considered before adding new therapies.

摘要

背景

与常规护理相比,PHARMACOP 干预显著提高了 COPD 患者的药物依从性和吸入技术。本研究旨在评估其成本效益。

方法

从比利时医疗保健支付者的角度进行了经济分析。构建了一个马尔可夫模型,其中包括一个具有代表性的 COPD 患者群体(平均年龄 70 岁,66%为男性,43%为当前吸烟者,1 秒用力呼气量占预计值的百分比为 50%),他们要么接受为期 3 个月的 PHARMACOP 干预,要么接受常规护理。计算了三种类型的成本:干预成本、药物成本和加重成本。结果指标包括医院治疗加重的次数、每预防一次医院治疗加重的成本和每质量调整生命年的成本。在基线分析中,随访时间为 1 年。进行了敏感性和情景分析(包括长期随访),以评估不确定性。

结果

在基线分析中,在 1 年的时间内,PHARMACOP 干预和常规护理的每位患者的总体平均成本分别为 2221 欧元和 2448 欧元。这反映了 PHARMACOP 干预的成本节约了 227 欧元。PHARMACOP 干预使每位患者的医院治疗加重次数减少了 0.07 次(PHARMACOP 为 0.177 次,常规护理为 0.244 次)。在各种敏感性分析中,结果均显示出成本节约。

结论

优化当前的药物治疗(例如密切监测吸入技术和药物依从性)已被证明是节省成本的,在添加新疗法之前应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/736a3d0e7125/1465-9921-15-66-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/b90836b7ba56/1465-9921-15-66-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/1e55b9430a57/1465-9921-15-66-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/5b1e965064c2/1465-9921-15-66-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/981247df78c7/1465-9921-15-66-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/8cd1a2c553c9/1465-9921-15-66-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/736a3d0e7125/1465-9921-15-66-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/b90836b7ba56/1465-9921-15-66-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/1e55b9430a57/1465-9921-15-66-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/5b1e965064c2/1465-9921-15-66-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/981247df78c7/1465-9921-15-66-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/8cd1a2c553c9/1465-9921-15-66-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb0/4067522/736a3d0e7125/1465-9921-15-66-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving inhaler adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的吸入器依从性:成本效益分析。
Respir Res. 2014 Jun 14;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-66.
2
Inhaler Review in Older Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Cost-Effectiveness Study and a Perspective in Portugal.老年哮喘或 COPD 患者吸入器评估:一项成本效益研究及葡萄牙视角。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1430-1436. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15834. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
3
Development of an economic model to assess the cost effectiveness of treatment interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.开发一种经济模型以评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗干预措施的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(6):619-37. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523060-00008.
4
Personalising adherence-enhancing interventions using a smart inhaler in patients with COPD: an exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis.使用智能吸入器对 COPD 患者进行个性化增强依从性干预:探索性成本效益分析。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Jun 27;28(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0092-8.
5
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination tiotropium-olodaterol for patients with COPD in the Netherlands.噻托溴铵-奥达特罗固定剂量复方支气管扩张剂对荷兰慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的成本效益及预算影响
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Sep 19;11:2191-2201. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S114738. eCollection 2016.
6
Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Inhaler Adherence Technologies in Difficult-to-Treat Asthma.长期使用数字吸入器依从性技术治疗难治性哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Oct;11(10):3064-3073.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.051. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Better use of inhaled medication in asthma and COPD through training, preparation and counselling: the On TRACk study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过培训、准备和咨询提高哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入药物的使用:一项集群随机对照试验的 On TRACk 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e061266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061266.
8
Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PHARMACOP): a randomized controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者药物治疗的有效性(PHARMACOP):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;77(5):756-66. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12242.
9
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-driven intervention in COPD (EPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.药剂师主导的慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的有效性(EPIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Oct 13;17(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1623-7.
10
[Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for patients with COPD: translated review of the recently published PHARMACOP trial].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者药学服务的有效性:已发表的PHARMACOP试验的翻译综述]
J Pharm Belg. 2014 Sep(3):4-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to advancement in respiratory medicine! Interview with the ECM award winner 2024.多学科协作是呼吸医学进步的关键!2024年ECM奖获得者访谈。
Breathe (Sheff). 2025 Aug 19;21(3):250148. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0148-2025. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate among US Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗在美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效比较
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):1131-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03088-1. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Improving medication adherence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的药物依从性:系统评价。
Respir Res. 2013 Oct 20;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-109.
2
Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (PHARMACOP): a randomized controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者药物治疗的有效性(PHARMACOP):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;77(5):756-66. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12242.
3
Clinical and economic impact of non-adherence in COPD: a systematic review.
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: Treatment Guidelines and Recommendations for Referral and Multidisciplinary Continuity of Care.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病:转诊及多学科连续护理的治疗指南与建议
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 5;13(2):303. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020303.
4
Implementing an Evidence-Based COPD Hospital Discharge Protocol: A Narrative Review and Expert Recommendations.实施基于证据的 COPD 医院出院方案:叙述性综述和专家建议。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4236-4263. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02609-8. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
5
Up-to-date guidance towards improving medication adherence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.最新的改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者药物依从性的指导意见。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(7):539-546. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2239708. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Correlation Analysis of the Therapy Adherence to Long-Acting Inhalers Among Patients with Stable COPD.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者长效吸入器治疗依从性的相关性分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jun 17;17:1467-1475. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S413948. eCollection 2023.
7
Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.吸入器电子监测设备对成人哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的临床影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;16(3):414. doi: 10.3390/ph16030414.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Nintedanib for Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD).尼达尼布治疗进行性纤维化间质性肺疾病(PF-ILD)患者的成本效益
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Sep;6(5):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00354-2. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
9
How to Choose the Right Inhaler Using a Patient-Centric Approach?如何采用以患者为中心的方法选择合适的吸入器?
Adv Ther. 2022 Mar;39(3):1149-1163. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-02034-9. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of a Medication Adherence Management Service Alongside a Cluster Randomized Control Trial in Community Pharmacy.社区药房中药物依从性管理服务的成本效用分析及一项整群随机对照试验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Oct 24;15:2363-2376. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S330371. eCollection 2021.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中不依从治疗的临床和经济影响:一项系统综述
Respir Med. 2014 Jan;108(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.08.044. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
4
COPD in the working age population: the economic impact on both patients and government.工作年龄段人群中的 COPD:对患者和政府的经济影响。
COPD. 2013 Dec;10(6):629-39. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2013.813446. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
5
The health economic impact of disease management programs for COPD: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.疾病管理计划对 COPD 的健康经济影响:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Jul 3;13:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-13-40.
6
Effect of a network system for providing proper inhalation technique by community pharmacists on clinical outcomes in COPD patients.社区药剂师提供正确吸入技术网络系统对 COPD 患者临床结局的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:239-44. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S44022. Epub 2013 May 9.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
8
A lifetime Markov model for the economic evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病经济评估的终生马尔可夫模型。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Sep 1;30(9):825-40. doi: 10.2165/11591340-000000000-00000.
9
Cost effectiveness of pharmacological maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the evidence and methodological issues.药物维持治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成本效益:证据和方法学问题综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Apr;30(4):271-302. doi: 10.2165/11589270-000000000-00000.
10
Developing and applying a stochastic dynamic population model for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.开发并应用慢性阻塞性肺疾病的随机动态人口模型。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1039-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Sep 22.