Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit, Aveiro Health Centre, Aveiro, Portugal.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jul;67(7):1430-1436. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15834. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
Older patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are particularly susceptible to exacerbations that may be associated with incorrect use of inhalers. Educational programs with inhaler technique review seem to be effective, but no studies have addressed their cost-effectiveness in older adult patients. The objective was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of education programs in older patients and estimate the cost benefit of applying such a program in Portugal.
We developed a decision tree analysis from a healthcare perspective, according to intervention costs and the exacerbation rates and costs described in a previous meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis of worst and best case scenarios was performed to estimate thresholds for intervention affordable limits, as well as cost-saving estimations and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for a Portuguese scenario.
We estimated cost-effectiveness thresholds applicable in all settings and performed a sensitivity analysis of a theoretical intervention model in all patients including an inhaler technique review at an annual appointment with a doctor and a nurse.
In the best case scenario, the intervention affordable budget could be up to almost 1800€ (US $1585.24) per patient per year. Mean intervention-associated savings in Portugal would be 311.88€ (US $274.68) per patient per year, representing annual savings up to €131 million (US $150 million) for the whole health system, already including intervention costs. ICERs for Portugal vary between 93.73€ (US $82.55) and 437.43€ (US $385.25) per exacerbation avoided.
A model of an intervention program with an inhaler technique review in older adult patients suggests that this intervention is cost-effective and can generate significant savings. J Am Geriatr Soc 1-7, 2019.
哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病的老年患者特别容易发生与吸入器使用不当相关的加重。具有吸入器技术审查的教育计划似乎是有效的,但尚无研究涉及这些计划在老年患者中的成本效益。目的是对老年患者的教育计划进行成本效益分析,并估计在葡萄牙实施此类计划的成本效益。
我们根据干预成本以及先前荟萃分析中描述的加重率和成本,从医疗保健角度制定了决策树分析。对最坏和最佳情况进行了敏感性分析,以估计干预可承受的限制的阈值,以及葡萄牙方案的成本节省估计和增量成本效益比(ICER)。
我们估计了所有情况下适用的成本效益阈值,并对所有患者进行了理论干预模型的敏感性分析,包括在年度医生和护士预约时进行吸入器技术审查。
在最佳情况下,每年每个患者的干预可承受预算最高可达近 1800 欧元(1585.24 美元)。葡萄牙每年与干预相关的平均节省为 311.88 欧元(274.68 美元),每年可为整个卫生系统节省高达 1.31 亿欧元(1.5 亿美元),其中已包括干预成本。葡萄牙的 ICER 范围在每避免一次加重 93.73 欧元(82.55 美元)至 437.43 欧元(385.25 美元)之间。
一项针对老年患者的吸入器技术审查干预计划模型表明,该干预措施具有成本效益,可以产生重大节省。美国老年学会杂志 1-7,2019。