Suppr超能文献

在乙醇影响下实验者对八个近交系小鼠品系行为测试分数的影响。

Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol.

作者信息

Bohlen Martin, Hayes Erika R, Bohlen Benjamin, Bailoo Jeremy D, Crabbe John C, Wahlsten Douglas

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 275 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA; Program in Neuroscience, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 275 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2014 Oct 1;272:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

Abstract

Eight standard inbred mouse strains were evaluated for ethanol effects on a refined battery of behavioral tests in a study that was originally designed to assess the influence of rat odors in the colony on mouse behaviors. As part of the design of the study, two experimenters conducted the tests, and the study was carefully balanced so that equal numbers of mice in all groups and times of day were tested by each experimenter. A defect in airflow in the facility compromised the odor manipulation, and in fact the different odor exposure groups did not differ in their behaviors. The two experimenters, however, obtained markedly different results for three of the tests. Certain of the experimenter effects arose from the way they judged behaviors that were not automated and had to be rated by the experimenter, such as slips on the balance beam. Others were not evident prior to ethanol injection but had a major influence after the injection. For several measures, the experimenter effects were notably different for different inbred strains. Methods to evaluate and reduce the impact of experimenter effects in future research are discussed.

摘要

在一项最初旨在评估鼠群中大鼠气味对小鼠行为影响的研究中,对八个标准近交系小鼠品系进行了乙醇对一系列精细行为测试影响的评估。作为研究设计的一部分,由两名实验人员进行测试,并且研究经过精心平衡,以便每个实验人员在所有组和一天中的不同时间测试相同数量的小鼠。设施中的气流缺陷影响了气味控制,实际上不同气味暴露组的行为并无差异。然而,对于其中三项测试,两名实验人员得到了明显不同的结果。某些实验人员效应源于他们判断非自动化行为(必须由实验人员评分,如在平衡木上滑倒)的方式。其他效应在注射乙醇之前并不明显,但在注射后有重大影响。对于几项测量指标,不同近交系的实验人员效应显著不同。本文讨论了在未来研究中评估和减少实验人员效应影响的方法。

相似文献

7
The use of behavioral test batteries, II: effect of test interval.行为测试组套的使用,II:测试间隔的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Jan 30;87(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Beyond the null: Recognizing and reporting true negative findings.超越零假设:识别和报告真正的阴性结果。
iScience. 2024 Dec 24;28(1):111676. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111676. eCollection 2025 Jan 17.
4
Investigating the role of GPR39 in treatment of stress-induced depression and anxiety.研究GPR39在应激性抑郁和焦虑治疗中的作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jun;242(6):1377-1406. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06736-0. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

3
Facial expressions of mice in aggressive and fearful contexts.在攻击和恐惧情境下的小鼠面部表情。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Dec 5;107(5):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.024. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
7
Animal models of pain: progress and challenges.疼痛的动物模型:进展与挑战。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Apr;10(4):283-94. doi: 10.1038/nrn2606. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验