Bohlen Martin, Hayes Erika R, Bohlen Benjamin, Bailoo Jeremy D, Crabbe John C, Wahlsten Douglas
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 275 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA; Program in Neuroscience, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 275 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Oct 1;272:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Eight standard inbred mouse strains were evaluated for ethanol effects on a refined battery of behavioral tests in a study that was originally designed to assess the influence of rat odors in the colony on mouse behaviors. As part of the design of the study, two experimenters conducted the tests, and the study was carefully balanced so that equal numbers of mice in all groups and times of day were tested by each experimenter. A defect in airflow in the facility compromised the odor manipulation, and in fact the different odor exposure groups did not differ in their behaviors. The two experimenters, however, obtained markedly different results for three of the tests. Certain of the experimenter effects arose from the way they judged behaviors that were not automated and had to be rated by the experimenter, such as slips on the balance beam. Others were not evident prior to ethanol injection but had a major influence after the injection. For several measures, the experimenter effects were notably different for different inbred strains. Methods to evaluate and reduce the impact of experimenter effects in future research are discussed.
在一项最初旨在评估鼠群中大鼠气味对小鼠行为影响的研究中,对八个标准近交系小鼠品系进行了乙醇对一系列精细行为测试影响的评估。作为研究设计的一部分,由两名实验人员进行测试,并且研究经过精心平衡,以便每个实验人员在所有组和一天中的不同时间测试相同数量的小鼠。设施中的气流缺陷影响了气味控制,实际上不同气味暴露组的行为并无差异。然而,对于其中三项测试,两名实验人员得到了明显不同的结果。某些实验人员效应源于他们判断非自动化行为(必须由实验人员评分,如在平衡木上滑倒)的方式。其他效应在注射乙醇之前并不明显,但在注射后有重大影响。对于几项测量指标,不同近交系的实验人员效应显著不同。本文讨论了在未来研究中评估和减少实验人员效应影响的方法。