van den Dungen Pim, van Kuijk Lisa, van Marwijk Harm, van der Wouden Johannes, Moll van Charante Eric, van der Horst Henriette, van Hout Hein
Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Oct;26(10):1603-1618. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000969. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Studies in memory clinics suggest that the majority of patients would like to know of a diagnosis of dementia. It is less clear what preferences are in the community. Our objective was to review the literature on preferences regarding disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia and to assess key arguments in favor of and against disclosure.
Systematic search of empirical studies was performed in Pubmed, Embase, and Psycinfo. We extracted preferences of individuals without cognitive impairment (general population; relatives of dementia patients; and physicians) and preferences of individuals referred to a memory clinic or already diagnosed with dementia. A meta-analysis was done using a random effects model. Our main conclusions are based on studies with a response rate ≥75%.
We included 23 articles (9.065 respondents). In studies with individuals without cognitive impairment, the pooled percentage in favor of disclosure was 90.7% (95%CI: 83.8%-97.5%). In studies with patients who were referred to a memory clinic or already diagnosed with dementia, the pooled percentage that considered disclosure favorable was 84.8% (95%CI: 75.6%-94.0%). The central arguments in favor of disclosure pertained to autonomy and the possibility to plan one's future. Arguments against disclosure were fear of getting upset and that knowing has no use.
The vast majority of individuals without and with cognitive impairment prefers to be informed about a diagnosis of dementia for reasons pertaining to autonomy.
记忆门诊的研究表明,大多数患者希望知晓痴呆症的诊断结果。而在普通人群中,人们对此的偏好尚不清楚。我们的目标是回顾关于痴呆症诊断结果披露偏好的文献,并评估支持和反对披露的关键论据。
在PubMed、Embase和Psycinfo中对实证研究进行系统检索。我们提取了无认知障碍个体(普通人群、痴呆症患者亲属和医生)以及被转诊至记忆门诊或已被诊断为痴呆症的个体的偏好。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们的主要结论基于应答率≥75%的研究。
我们纳入了23篇文章(9065名受访者)。在针对无认知障碍个体的研究中,支持披露的合并百分比为90.7%(95%置信区间:83.8%-97.5%)。在针对被转诊至记忆门诊或已被诊断为痴呆症的患者的研究中,认为披露有利的合并百分比为84.8%(95%置信区间:75.6%-94.0%)。支持披露的核心论据涉及自主权以及规划未来的可能性。反对披露的论据是担心心烦意乱以及认为知晓并无用处。
绝大多数有认知障碍和无认知障碍的个体都倾向于因自主权相关原因而被告知痴呆症的诊断结果。