Armstrong Melissa J, Bedenfield Noheli, Rosselli Monica, Curiel Cid Rosie E, Kitaigorodsky Marcela, Galvin James E, Lachner Christian, Grant Smith Amanda, de Los Ángeles Ortega María, Mohiuddin Yasmin, Shatzer Julie, Marasco Deann, Willis Dianna, Bylund Carma L
Department of Neurology (MJA, NB, YM), University of Florida College of Medicine; UF Health Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases (MJA, NB, YM), Gainesville; Department of Psychology (MR), Florida Atlantic University, Davie; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (RECC), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; FL Neuro-Health (MK), Miami; Comprehensive Center for Brain Health (JEG), Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Boca Raton; Department of Neurology (CL); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology (CL), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (AGS); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (AGS), Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa; Louis and Anne Green Memory and Wellness Center (MÁO), Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton; Alzheimer's Association (JS, DM), Florida Region, Clearwater; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics (CLB), University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL; and [N/A - caregiver representative] (DW).
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Feb;14(1):e200223. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200223. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
Many individuals with dementia and their families report not receiving a dementia diagnosis. Previously published standards for delivering a dementia diagnosis are now more than 10 years old and were developed without patient and caregiver input. The objective of this study was to identify best practices for delivering a diagnosis of dementia using existing literature, involvement of diverse stakeholders, and consensus building through a formal modified Delphi approach.
We convened a multi-stakeholder working group including a patient, caregivers, Alzheimer's Association staff, and clinicians from diverse backgrounds. The panel used the American Academy of Neurology process for recommendation development, consisting of a half-day workshop and 3 rounds of anonymous modified Delphi voting to achieve consensus.
The working group convened from May 2022 through January 2023. The group chose to focus statements on a limited number of best practices that can be applied across clinic types. Seven best practice statements achieved consensus after a maximum of 3 rounds of voting. These included the following: (1) Clinicians must show compassion and empathy when delivering a diagnosis of dementia (level A). During dementia diagnosis disclosure, clinicians should (2) ask regarding diagnosis preferences, (3) instill realistic hope, (4) provide practical strategies, (5) provide education and connections to high-quality resources, (6) connect caregivers to support resources, and (7) provide written summaries of the diagnoses, plan, and relevant resources (each level B).
Clinicians need to customize discussion of a dementia diagnosis for individual patients and their caregivers. These 7 best practices provide a diagnosis communication framework that can be implemented across varied clinical settings. Additional strategies, such as using optimal general communication approaches, are also important for dementia diagnosis discussions. Thoughtful application of these best practices is particularly important when caring for individuals from underrepresented communities. Further improving communication regarding dementia diagnoses will require health system changes (e.g., for sufficient time), improved access to specialty dementia care, and clinician training for delivering difficult diagnoses. More research is needed to identify culturally sensitive approaches to discussing dementia diagnoses.
许多患有痴呆症的患者及其家属表示未得到痴呆症诊断。先前发布的痴呆症诊断标准距今已有十多年,且制定过程未纳入患者和护理人员的意见。本研究的目的是利用现有文献、不同利益相关者的参与以及通过正式的改良德尔菲法达成共识,确定痴呆症诊断的最佳实践方法。
我们召集了一个多利益相关者工作组,成员包括一名患者、护理人员、阿尔茨海默病协会工作人员以及来自不同背景的临床医生。该小组采用美国神经病学学会的推荐制定流程,包括为期半天的研讨会和三轮匿名的改良德尔菲投票以达成共识。
工作组于2022年5月至2023年1月召开会议。该小组选择将陈述重点放在可应用于各类诊所的有限数量的最佳实践方法上。经过最多三轮投票,七条最佳实践陈述达成了共识。这些陈述包括:(1)临床医生在进行痴呆症诊断时必须表现出同情和同理心(A级)。在披露痴呆症诊断结果时,临床医生应(2)询问诊断偏好,(3)注入现实的希望,(4)提供实用策略,(5)提供教育并连接到高质量资源,(6)将护理人员连接到支持资源,以及(7)提供诊断、计划和相关资源的书面总结(均为B级)。
临床医生需要针对个体患者及其护理人员定制痴呆症诊断的讨论。这七条最佳实践方法提供了一个可在各种临床环境中实施的诊断沟通框架。其他策略,如采用最佳的一般沟通方法,对于痴呆症诊断讨论也很重要。在照顾来自代表性不足社区的个体时,深思熟虑地应用这些最佳实践方法尤为重要。进一步改善痴呆症诊断的沟通将需要卫生系统的变革(例如提供足够的时间)、改善获得痴呆症专科护理的机会以及临床医生进行困难诊断的培训。需要更多研究来确定讨论痴呆症诊断的文化敏感方法。