Nasmyth D G, Johnston D, Williams N S, King R F, Burkinshaw L, Brooks K
University Department of Surgery, General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Mar;32(3):230-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02554535.
Bile acid absorption was investigated using 75Se Taurohomocholate (SeHCAT) in controls and patients who had undergone total colectomy with either conventional ileostomy or pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis or adenomatous polyposis. Whole-body retention of SeHCAT after 168 hours was greater in the controls than the patients who had undergone colectomy (P less than .05). Retention of SeHCAT did not differ significantly between patients with an ileostomy and patients with pouch-anal anastomosis, but patients with an ileostomy and ileal resection of more than 20 cm retained less SeHCAT than patients with a pouch-anal anastomosis (P less than .01). Analysis of fecal bile acids from ileostomies and pouches showed that bacterial metabolism of primary conjugated bile acids was greater in patients with a pouch. It was concluded that bile acid absorption was not significantly impaired by construction of a pouch compared with conventional ileostomy, but bacterial metabolism of bile acids was greater in the pouches.
采用75硒-牛磺高胆酸(SeHCAT)对对照组以及因溃疡性结肠炎或腺瘤性息肉病接受全结肠切除并采用传统回肠造口术或储袋-肛管吻合术的患者进行胆汁酸吸收情况的研究。168小时后,对照组中SeHCAT的全身潴留量高于接受结肠切除术的患者(P<0.05)。回肠造口术患者和储袋-肛管吻合术患者之间SeHCAT的潴留量无显著差异,但回肠造口术且回肠切除超过20 cm的患者比储袋-肛管吻合术患者潴留的SeHCAT更少(P<0.01)。对回肠造口和储袋的粪便胆汁酸分析表明,储袋患者中初级结合胆汁酸的细菌代谢更活跃。研究得出结论,与传统回肠造口术相比,储袋的构建并未显著损害胆汁酸吸收,但储袋中胆汁酸的细菌代谢更活跃。