Ackerman Sara L, Gleason Nathaniel, Monacelli Jennifer, Collado Don, Wang Michael, Ho Chanda, Catschegn-Pfab Sereina, Gonzales Ralph
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 455, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Oct;29(10):1355-61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2920-z. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Subspecialty ambulatory care visits have doubled in the past 10 years and nearly half of all visits are for follow-up care. Could some of this care be provided by primary care providers (PCPs)?
To determine how often PCPs and specialists agree that a mutual patient's condition could be managed exclusively by the PCP, and to understand PCPs' perspectives on factors that influence decisions about 'repatriation,' or the transfer of patient management to primary care.
A mixed method approach including paired surveys of PCPs and specialists about the necessity for ongoing specialty care of mutual patients, and interviews with PCPs about care coordination practices and reasons for differing opinions with specialists.
One hundred and eighty-nine PCPs and 59 physicians representing five medicine subspecialties completed paired surveys for 343 patients. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 PCPs.
For each patient, PCPs and specialists were asked, "Could this diagnosis be managed exclusively by the PCP?"
Specialists and PCPs agreed that transfer to primary care was appropriate for 16% of patients, whereas 36% had specialists and PCPs who agreed that ongoing specialty care was appropriate. Specialists were half as likely as PCPs to identify patients as appropriate for transfer to primary care. PCPs identified several factors that influence the likelihood that patients will be transferred to primary care, including perceived patient preferences, limited access to physician appointments, excessive workload, inter-clinician communication norms, and differences in clinical judgment. We group these factors into two domains: 'push-back' and 'pull-back' to primary care.
At a large academic medical center, approximately one in six patients receiving ongoing specialty care could potentially be managed exclusively by a PCP. PCPs identified several non-clinical factors to explain continuation of specialty care when patient transfer to PCP is clinically appropriate.
专科门诊护理就诊量在过去10年中翻了一番,几乎一半的就诊是为了后续护理。其中一些护理能否由初级保健提供者(PCP)提供?
确定初级保健提供者和专科医生在多大程度上一致认为共同患者的病情可完全由初级保健提供者管理,并了解初级保健提供者对影响“转回”决策(即将患者管理转至初级保健)的因素的看法。
采用混合方法,包括对初级保健提供者和专科医生进行配对调查,询问共同患者持续接受专科护理的必要性,并对初级保健提供者进行访谈,了解护理协调实践以及与专科医生意见不同的原因。
189名初级保健提供者和代表五个医学亚专科的59名医生为343名患者完成了配对调查。对16名初级保健提供者进行了半结构化访谈。
针对每位患者,向初级保健提供者和专科医生询问:“这个诊断能否完全由初级保健提供者管理?”
专科医生和初级保健提供者一致认为16%的患者适合转至初级保健,而36%的患者,专科医生和初级保健提供者都认为持续接受专科护理是合适的。专科医生认为患者适合转至初级保健的可能性只有初级保健提供者的一半。初级保健提供者确定了几个影响患者转至初级保健可能性的因素,包括患者的感知偏好、预约医生困难、工作量过大、临床医生之间的沟通规范以及临床判断差异。我们将这些因素分为两个领域:初级保健的“阻力”和“吸引力”。
在一家大型学术医疗中心,约六分之一正在接受持续专科护理的患者可能完全由初级保健提供者管理。初级保健提供者确定了几个非临床因素来解释为何在临床上适合将患者转至初级保健时仍继续提供专科护理。