Suppr超能文献

持续应对慢性阻塞性肺疾病国际医师调查:12个国家医师对慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理指南的认知与应用

Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician Survey: physician knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in 12 countries.

作者信息

Davis Kourtney J, Landis Sarah H, Oh Yeon-Mok, Mannino David M, Han MeiLan K, van der Molen Thys, Aisanov Zaurbek, Menezes Ana M, Ichinose Masakazu, Muellerova Hana

机构信息

Worldwide Epidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline, Wavre, Belgium.

Worldwide Epidemiology, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Dec 30;10:39-55. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S70162. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

AIM

Utilizing data from the Continuing to Confront COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) International Physician Survey, this study aimed to describe physicians' knowledge and application of the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD diagnosis and treatment recommendations and compare performance between primary care physicians (PCPs) and respiratory specialists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Physicians from 12 countries were sampled from in-country professional databases; 1,307 physicians (PCP to respiratory specialist ratio three to one) who regularly consult with COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis patients were interviewed online, by telephone or face to face. Physicians were questioned about COPD risk factors, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment, including knowledge and application of the GOLD global strategy using patient scenarios.

RESULTS

Physicians reported using spirometry routinely (PCPs 82%, respiratory specialists 100%; P<0.001) to diagnose COPD and frequently included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PCPs 67%, respiratory specialists 81%; P<0.001). Respiratory specialists were more likely than PCPs to report awareness of the GOLD global strategy (93% versus 58%, P<0.001); however, when presented with patient scenarios, they did not always perform better than PCPs with regard to recommending GOLD-concordant treatment options. The proportion of PCPs and respiratory specialists providing first- or second-choice treatment options concordant with GOLD strategy for a GOLD B-type patient was 38% versus 67%, respectively. For GOLD C and D-type patients, the concordant proportions for PCPs and respiratory specialists were 40% versus 38%, and 57% versus 58%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This survey of physicians in 12 countries practicing in the primary care and respiratory specialty settings showed high awareness of COPD-management guidelines. Frequent use of guideline-recommended COPD diagnostic practices was reported; however, gaps in the application of COPD-treatment recommendations were observed, warranting further evaluation to understand potential barriers to adopt guideline recommendations.

摘要

目的

利用“持续应对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)国际医师调查”的数据,本研究旨在描述医师对慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议组织(GOLD)的慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断、管理和预防全球策略的知识掌握及应用情况,并比较初级保健医师(PCP)和呼吸专科医师的表现。

材料与方法

从12个国家的国内专业数据库中抽取医师;通过在线、电话或面对面访谈了1307名经常诊治慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肺气肿或慢性支气管炎患者的医师(PCP与呼吸专科医师的比例为三比一)。询问医师关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的危险因素、预后、诊断和治疗,包括使用患者病例来了解他们对GOLD全球策略的知识掌握及应用情况。

结果

医师报告常规使用肺活量测定法诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病(PCP为82%,呼吸专科医师为100%;P<0.001),并且经常纳入经过验证的患者报告结局指标(PCP为67%,呼吸专科医师为81%;P<0.001)。呼吸专科医师比初级保健医师更有可能报告知晓GOLD全球策略(93%对58%,P<0.001);然而,在面对患者病例时,在推荐符合GOLD的治疗方案方面,他们并不总是比初级保健医师表现得更好。对于一名GOLD B型患者,提供符合GOLD策略的首选或次选治疗方案的初级保健医师和呼吸专科医师的比例分别为38%和67%。对于GOLD C型和D型患者,初级保健医师和呼吸专科医师的符合比例分别为40%对38%以及57%对58%。

结论

这项对12个国家从事初级保健和呼吸专科工作的医师进行的调查显示,他们对慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理指南的知晓度较高。报告显示经常使用指南推荐的慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断方法;然而,观察到在慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗建议的应用方面存在差距,需要进一步评估以了解采用指南建议的潜在障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ed4/4284025/89592be0d881/copd-10-039Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验