Pipes W O, Minnigh H A, Moyer B, Troy M A
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Sep;52(3):439-43. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.3.439-443.1986.
A total of 2,601 water samples from six different water systems were tested for coliform bacteria by Clark's presence-absence (P-A) test and by the membrane filter (MF) method. There was no significant difference in the fraction of samples positive for coliform bacteria for any of the systems tested. It was concluded that the two tests are equivalent for monitoring purposes. However, 152 samples were positive for coliform bacteria by the MF method but negative by the P-A test, and 132 samples were positive by the P-A test but negative by the MF method. Many of these differences for individual samples can be explained by random dispersion of bacteria in subsamples when the coliform density is low. However, 15 samples had MF counts greater than 3 and gave negative P-A results. The only apparent explanation for most of these results is that coliform bacteria were present in the P-A test bottles but did not produce acid and gas. Two other studies have reported more samples positive by Clark's P-A test than by the MF method.
通过克拉克氏存在-缺失(P-A)试验和膜过滤(MF)法,对来自六个不同水系统的总共2601份水样进行了大肠菌群检测。在所测试的任何系统中,大肠菌群检测呈阳性的样本比例均无显著差异。得出的结论是,这两种检测方法在监测目的上是等效的。然而,有152份样本通过MF法检测出大肠菌群呈阳性,但通过P-A试验呈阴性,还有132份样本通过P-A试验呈阳性,但通过MF法呈阴性。当大肠菌群密度较低时,单个样本的许多此类差异可以用细菌在子样本中的随机分布来解释。然而,有15份样本的MF计数大于3,但P-A结果为阴性。对这些结果中大多数的唯一明显解释是,在P-A试验瓶中存在大肠菌群,但它们没有产生酸和气体。另外两项研究报告称,通过克拉克氏P-A试验检测出呈阳性的样本比通过MF法检测出的更多。