Suppr超能文献

一种用于患者对患者参与偏好的临床工具——4Ps的开发与初步验证

The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation--The 4Ps.

作者信息

Eldh Ann Catrine, Luhr Kristina, Ehnfors Margareta

机构信息

Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2522-35. doi: 10.1111/hex.12221. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

Abstract

AIMS

To report on the development and initial testing of a clinical tool, The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool (The 4Ps), which will allow patients to depict, prioritize, and evaluate their participation in health care.

BACKGROUND

While patient participation is vital for high quality health care, a common definition incorporating all stakeholders' experience is pending. In order to support participation in health care, a tool for determining patients' preferences on participation is proposed, including opportunities to evaluate participation while considering patient preferences.

METHODS

Exploratory mixed methods studies informed the development of the tool, and descriptive design guided its initial testing. The 4Ps tool was tested with 21 Swedish researcher experts (REs) and patient experts (PEs) with experience of patient participation. Individual Think Aloud interviews were employed to capture experiences of content, response process, and acceptability.

RESULTS

'The 4Ps' included three sections for the patient to depict, prioritize, and evaluate participation using 12 items corresponding to 'Having Dialogue', 'Sharing Knowledge', 'Planning', and 'Managing Self-care'. The REs and PEs considered 'The 4Ps' comprehensible, and that all items corresponded to the concept of patient participation. The tool was perceived to facilitate patient participation whilst requiring amendments to content and layout.

CONCLUSIONS

A tool like The 4Ps provides opportunities for patients to depict participation, and thus supports communication and collaboration. Further patient evaluation is needed to understand the conditions for patient participation. While The 4Ps is promising, revision and testing in clinical practice is required.

摘要

目的

报告一种临床工具——患者参与的患者偏好工具(The 4Ps)的开发及初步测试情况,该工具将使患者能够描述、确定优先次序并评估他们在医疗保健中的参与情况。

背景

虽然患者参与对高质量医疗保健至关重要,但一个包含所有利益相关者经验的通用定义仍未确定。为了支持患者参与医疗保健,提出了一种确定患者参与偏好的工具,包括在考虑患者偏好的同时评估参与情况的机会。

方法

探索性混合方法研究为该工具的开发提供了信息,描述性设计指导了其初步测试。The 4Ps工具在21名有患者参与经验的瑞典研究专家(REs)和患者专家(PEs)中进行了测试。采用个人出声思考访谈来获取关于内容、回答过程和可接受性的经验。

结果

“The 4Ps”包括三个部分,让患者使用与“进行对话”“分享知识”“规划”和“自我护理管理”相对应的12个项目来描述、确定优先次序并评估参与情况。研究专家和患者专家认为“The 4Ps”易于理解,且所有项目都与患者参与的概念相符。该工具被认为有助于患者参与,同时需要对内容和布局进行修改。

结论

像The 4Ps这样的工具为患者描述参与情况提供了机会,从而支持沟通与协作。需要进一步对患者进行评估,以了解患者参与的条件。虽然The 4Ps很有前景,但需要在临床实践中进行修订和测试。

相似文献

1
The development and initial validation of a clinical tool for patients' preferences on patient participation--The 4Ps.
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2522-35. doi: 10.1111/hex.12221. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
3
Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05574-y.
5
Patient preferences and experiences of participation in surgical cancer care.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Oct;19(5):405-414. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12589. Epub 2022 May 24.
9
Considering patient non-participation in health care.
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):263-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00488.x.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

6
Patient Participation in Forensic Psychiatric Care: The Initial Development and Content Validity of a New Instrument.
J Forensic Nurs. 2023;19(3):204-213. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000409. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
Patients' Lived Experiences of the Paternalistic Care Behavior: A Qualitative study.
J Caring Sci. 2022 Feb 15;11(3):163-171. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2022.10. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
An Observational Study of Physicians' Workflow Interruptions in Outpatient Departments in China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;10:884764. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884764. eCollection 2022.
10
Patient preferences and experiences of participation in surgical cancer care.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Oct;19(5):405-414. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12589. Epub 2022 May 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Measuring patient participation in surgical treatment decision-making from healthcare professionals' perspective.
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):482-91. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12184. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
The impact of an intervention to improve patient participation in a surgical care unit: a quasi-experimental study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):528-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
4
An exploration of person-centredness in practice.
Online J Issues Nurs. 2011 May 31;16(2):1.
5
The congruence of patient communication preferences and physician communication behavior in cardiac patients.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):349-57. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318228a341.
6
Person-centered care--ready for prime time.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Dec;10(4):248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
7
Turning signals into meaning--'shared decision making' meets communication theory.
Health Expect. 2012 Mar;15(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00657.x. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
8
Questionnaire for patient participation in emergency departments: development and psychometric testing.
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Mar;67(3):643-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05472.x. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
9
The shifting landscape of health care: toward a model of health care empowerment.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Feb;101(2):265-70. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.189829. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
10
Patient participation in the emergency department: an evaluation using a specific instrument to measure patient participation (PPED).
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Apr;67(4):728-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05524.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验