Suppr超能文献

评估和报告患者参与情况,方法是了解患者的偏好和体验。

Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences.

机构信息

Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, SE751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05574-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although patient participation is strongly associated with high quality of healthcare, valid means to measure and report a comprehensive notion of patient participation are scarce. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (4Ps) is a new healthcare practice and research tool, comprising patients' preferences as well as experiences. The 4Ps employs 12 items for the patient to conceptualise patient participation. The aim of this paper is to describe how the two perspectives of patient participation, namely preferences and experiences, can be combined to visualise and report preference-based patient participation.

METHODS

With four response alternatives in each section, the 4Ps offers sixteen possible combinations of degree of match per item. Theoretical and clinical principles fostered a tentative order of six ranks and three levels of preference-based patient participation. To test the standard, statistical analyses for ordinal data were performed, using data from a randomised controlled trial evaluating an intervention aiming to improve patient participation. Further, structures for visualising the preference-based patient participation of individuals and groups were suggested.

RESULTS

Data from the 4Ps demonstrated the individuals' preference-based patient participation, indicating either a match or a mismatch for each item. Mismatches represented either the experience of participation surpassing the patient's preferences, or the patient's preferences for patient participation not being established. At group level, the suggested approach for visualising and reporting the 4Ps demonstrated that the intervention group had a significantly higher proportion of sufficient preference-based patient participation for certain items than the control group. These results had not been identified earlier, when using the preferences and experiences of patient participation as separate measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Ways to easily acquaint stakeholders with patients' preferences for patient participation are needed, in order for healthcare staff to better use resources to match the basic requirements of individuals and groups. While the 4Ps can guide professionals to patient participation as framed in legislations, concept analyses and by patients, a visualisation of the results is needed to capture preference-based patient participation. The proposed route to representing degree of match in preferences and experiences may also be relevant to other dimensions of quality of healthcare.

摘要

背景

尽管患者参与度与高质量的医疗保健密切相关,但缺乏有效的衡量和报告全面患者参与度的方法。《患者对患者参与度的偏好》(4Ps)是一种新的医疗保健实践和研究工具,包含了患者的偏好和体验。4Ps 使用 12 个项目让患者概念化患者参与度。本文的目的是描述如何将患者参与度的两个视角,即偏好和体验,结合起来,以可视化和报告基于偏好的患者参与度。

方法

4Ps 在每个部分都有四个反应选项,每个项目有十六种可能的匹配程度组合。理论和临床原则促成了一个六阶和三阶的基于偏好的患者参与度的暂定顺序。为了检验该标准,使用一项旨在提高患者参与度的干预措施的随机对照试验的数据,对有序数据进行了统计分析。此外,还提出了用于可视化个体和群体基于偏好的患者参与度的结构。

结果

4Ps 的数据显示了个体的基于偏好的患者参与度,表明每个项目都存在匹配或不匹配。不匹配要么代表参与度超过了患者的偏好,要么代表患者对患者参与度的偏好没有确立。在群体层面,建议的 4Ps 可视化和报告方法表明,干预组在某些项目上的基于偏好的患者参与度显著高于对照组。这些结果在使用患者参与度的偏好和体验作为单独的措施时没有被发现。

结论

需要有一种简单的方法让利益相关者了解患者对患者参与度的偏好,以便医疗保健人员更好地利用资源来满足个人和群体的基本要求。虽然 4Ps 可以指导专业人员按照法规、概念分析和患者的要求进行患者参与度,但需要对结果进行可视化,以捕捉基于偏好的患者参与度。代表偏好和体验中匹配程度的建议方法也可能与医疗保健质量的其他维度相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a350/7391651/d79725c94530/12913_2020_5574_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验