Lu Yi, Ek Weronica E, Whiteman David, Vaughan Thomas L, Spurdle Amanda B, Easton Douglas F, Pharoah Paul D, Thompson Deborah J, Dunning Alison M, Hayward Nicholas K, Chenevix-Trench Georgia, Macgregor Stuart
Statistical Genetics.
Cancer Control Group.
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Nov 15;23(22):6112-8. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu312. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
Common cancers have been demarcated into 'hereditary' or 'sporadic' ('non-hereditary') types historically. Such distinctions initially arose from work identifying rare, highly penetrant germline mutations causing 'hereditary' cancer. While rare mutations are important in particular families, most cases in the general population are 'sporadic'. Twin studies have suggested that many 'sporadic' cancers show little or no heritability. To quantify the role of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility, we applied a method for estimating the importance of common genetic variants (array heritability, h(2)g) to twelve cancer types. The following cancers showed a significant (P < 0.05) array heritability: melanoma USA set h(2)g = 0.19 (95% CI = 0.01-0.37) and Australian set h(2)g = 0.30 (0.10-0.50); pancreatic h(2)g = 0.18 (0.06-0.30); prostate h(2)g = 0.81 (0.32-1); kidney h(2)g = 0.18 (0.04-0.32); ovarian h(2)g = 0.30 (0.18-0.42); esophageal adenocarcinoma h(2)g = 0.24 (0.14-0.34); esophageal squamous cell carcinoma h(2)g = 0.19 (0.07-0.31); endometrial UK set h(2)g = 0.23 (0.01-0.45) and Australian set h(2)g = 0.39 (0.02-0.76). Three cancers showed a positive but non-significant effect: breast h(2) g = 0.13 (0-0.56); gastric h(2)g = 0.11 (0-0.27); lung h(2)g = 0.10 (0-0.24). One cancer showed a small effect: bladder h(2)g = 0.01 (0-0.11). Among these cancers, previous twin studies were only able to show heritability for prostate and breast cancer, but we can now make much stronger statements for several common cancers which emphasize the important role of genetic variants in cancer susceptibility. We have demonstrated that several 'sporadic' cancers have a significant inherited component. Larger genome-wide association studies in these cancers will continue to find more loci, which explain part of the remaining polygenic component.
历史上,常见癌症已被划分为“遗传性”或“散发性”(“非遗传性”)类型。这种区分最初源于识别导致“遗传性”癌症的罕见、高外显率种系突变的研究工作。虽然罕见突变在特定家族中很重要,但普通人群中的大多数病例是“散发性”的。双胞胎研究表明,许多“散发性”癌症的遗传度很低或几乎没有遗传度。为了量化种系突变在癌症易感性中的作用,我们应用了一种估计常见基因变异重要性的方法(阵列遗传度,h(2)g)来研究12种癌症类型。以下癌症显示出显著(P < 0.05)的阵列遗传度:美国黑色素瘤数据集h(2)g = 0.19(95%置信区间 = 0.01 - 0.37),澳大利亚黑色素瘤数据集h(2)g = 0.30(0.10 - 0.50);胰腺癌h(2)g = 0.18(0.06 - 0.30);前列腺癌h(2)g = 0.81(0.32 - 1);肾癌h(2)g = 0.18(0.04 - 0.32);卵巢癌h(2)g = 0.30(0.18 - 0.42);食管腺癌h(2)g = 0.24(0.14 - 0.34);食管鳞状细胞癌h(2)g = 0.19(0.07 - 0.31);英国子宫内膜癌数据集h(2)g = 0.23(0.01 - 0.45),澳大利亚子宫内膜癌数据集h(2)g = 0.39(0.02 - 0.76)。三种癌症显示出正向但不显著的影响:乳腺癌h(2) g = 0.13(0 - 0.56);胃癌h(2)g = 0.11(0 - 0.27);肺癌h(2)g = 0.10(0 - 0.24)。一种癌症显示出较小的影响:膀胱癌h(2)g = 0.01(0 - 0.11)。在这些癌症中,先前的双胞胎研究仅能显示前列腺癌和乳腺癌的遗传度,但现在我们可以对几种常见癌症做出更强有力的说明,强调基因变异在癌症易感性中的重要作用。我们已经证明,几种“散发性”癌症有显著的遗传成分。对这些癌症进行更大规模的全基因组关联研究将继续发现更多位点,这些位点可以解释部分剩余的多基因成分。