Taylor Ronald P, Lindorfer Margaret A
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Mol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;86(5):485-91. doi: 10.1124/mol.114.092684. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
Since approval of rituximab for treatment of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for cancer treatment and elucidation of their cytotoxic mechanisms have been subject to intense investigations. Compelling evidence indicates that rituximab and another CD20 mAb, ofatumumab, must use the body's cellular and humoral immune effector functions to kill malignant cells. Other U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved mAbs, including obinutuzumab, cetuximab, and trastuzumab, require, in part, these effector mechanisms to eliminate tumor cells. Although gram quantities of mAbs can be administered to patients, our investigations of CD20 mAb-based therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including correlative measurements in clinical trials and studies with primary cells and cell lines, indicate that effector mechanisms necessary for mAb activity can be saturated or exhausted if tumor burdens are high, thus substantially compromising the efficacy of high-dose mAb therapy. Under these conditions, another reaction (trogocytosis) predominates in which bound CD20 mAb and CD20 are removed from targeted cells by effector cells that express Fcγ receptors, thereby allowing malignant cells to escape unharmed and continue to promote disease pathology. To address this problem, we propose that a low-dose strategy, based on administering 30-50 mg of CD20 mAb three times per week, may be far more effective for CLL than standard dosing because it will minimize effector function saturation and reduce trogocytosis. This approach may have general applicability to other mAbs that use immune effector functions, and could be formulated into a subcutaneous treatment strategy that would be more accessible and possibly more efficacious for patients.
自利妥昔单抗被批准用于治疗B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤以来,用于癌症治疗的单克隆抗体(mAb)的研发及其细胞毒性机制的阐释一直是深入研究的课题。有力证据表明,利妥昔单抗和另一种CD20单克隆抗体奥法木单抗必须利用机体的细胞和体液免疫效应功能来杀死恶性细胞。其他美国食品药品监督管理局批准的单克隆抗体,包括奥滨尤妥珠单抗、西妥昔单抗和曲妥珠单抗,部分需要这些效应机制来消除肿瘤细胞。尽管可以给患者施用克级量的单克隆抗体,但我们对基于CD20单克隆抗体治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的研究,包括临床试验中的相关测量以及对原代细胞和细胞系的研究表明,如果肿瘤负荷很高,单克隆抗体活性所需的效应机制可能会饱和或耗尽,从而严重损害高剂量单克隆抗体治疗的疗效。在这些情况下,另一种反应(细胞吞噬作用)占主导地位,即表达Fcγ受体的效应细胞将结合的CD20单克隆抗体和CD20从靶细胞中去除,从而使恶性细胞毫发无损地逃脱并继续促进疾病病理发展。为了解决这个问题,我们提出,基于每周三次施用30 - 50毫克CD20单克隆抗体的低剂量策略对CLL可能比标准剂量更有效,因为它将使效应功能饱和最小化并减少细胞吞噬作用。这种方法可能对其他利用免疫效应功能的单克隆抗体具有普遍适用性,并且可以制定成皮下治疗策略,对患者来说更容易获得且可能更有效。