Suppr超能文献

在低收入和中等收入国家,线性生长发育迟缓问题在出生后的头1000天之后仍持续累积:来自51项全国性调查的全球证据。

Linear growth deficit continues to accumulate beyond the first 1000 days in low- and middle-income countries: global evidence from 51 national surveys.

作者信息

Leroy Jef L, Ruel Marie, Habicht Jean-Pierre, Frongillo Edward A

机构信息

Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2014 Sep;144(9):1460-6. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.191981. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Abstract

Growth faltering is usually assessed using height-for-age Z-scores (HAZs), which have been used for comparisons of children of different age and sex composition across populations. Because the SD (denominator) for calculating HAZ increases with age, the usefulness of HAZs to assess changes in height over time (across ages) is uncertain. We posited that population-level changes in height as populations age should be assessed using absolute height-for-age differences (HADs) and not HAZs. We used data from 51 nationwide surveys from low- and middle-income countries and graphed mean HAZs and HADs by age. We also calculated annual changes in HAZs and HADs and percentage of total height deficit accumulated annually from birth to age 60 mo using both approaches. Mean HAZ started at -0.4 Z-scores and dropped dramatically up to 24 mo, after which it stabilized and had no additional deterioration. Mean HAD started at -0.8 cm, with the most pronounced faltering occurring between 6 and 18 mo, similar to HAZ. However, in sharp contrast to HAZ, HAD curves had continued increases in the deficit of linear growth from 18 to 60 mo, with no indication of a leveling off. Globally, 70% of the absolute deficit accumulated in height (HAD) at 60 mo was found to be due to faltering during the first "1000 days" (conception to 24 mo), but 30% was due to continued increases in deficit from age 2 to 5 y. The use of HAZ masks these changes because of age-related changes in SD. Therefore, HAD, rather than HAZ, should be used to describe and compare changes in height as children age because detecting any deficit compared with expected changes in height as children grow is important and only HAD does this accurately at all ages. Our findings support the current global programmatic momentum to focus on the first 1000 d. Research is needed to better understand the dynamics and timing of linear growth faltering using indices and indicators that accurately reflect changes over ages and to identify cost-effective ways to prevent growth faltering and its consequences throughout the lifecycle.

摘要

生长发育迟缓通常使用年龄别身高Z评分(HAZ)来评估,该评分已用于比较不同年龄和性别人口构成的儿童群体。由于计算HAZ的标准差(分母)随年龄增加,HAZ用于评估身高随时间(跨年龄)变化的有效性尚不确定。我们认为,随着人口老龄化,应使用绝对年龄别身高差异(HAD)而非HAZ来评估人群层面的身高变化。我们使用了来自低收入和中等收入国家的51项全国性调查数据,并按年龄绘制了平均HAZ和HAD图表。我们还使用这两种方法计算了HAZ和HAD的年度变化,以及从出生到60月龄每年累积的总身高不足百分比。平均HAZ从-0.4 Z评分开始,在24月龄前急剧下降,之后趋于稳定且无进一步恶化。平均HAD从-0.8厘米开始,最明显的生长发育迟缓发生在6至18月龄之间,与HAZ相似。然而,与HAZ形成鲜明对比的是,HAD曲线在18至60月龄期间线性生长不足持续增加,没有趋于平稳的迹象。全球范围内,60月龄时身高绝对不足(HAD)累积量的70%被发现是由于头“1000天”(受孕至24月龄)期间的生长发育迟缓,但30%是由于2至5岁期间不足持续增加。由于标准差随年龄变化,使用HAZ掩盖了这些变化。因此,应该使用HAD而非HAZ来描述和比较儿童成长过程中的身高变化,因为检测与儿童成长过程中预期身高变化相比的任何不足很重要,而只有HAD能在所有年龄段准确做到这一点。我们的研究结果支持当前全球关注头1000天的项目发展势头。需要开展研究,以更好地利用能准确反映随年龄变化的指标和指数来理解线性生长发育迟缓的动态变化和时间节点,并确定具有成本效益的方法来预防生长发育迟缓及其在整个生命周期中的后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验