• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

融合共进:工作组集体效能与集体流畅感的纵向研究。

Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;148(4):435-55. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.806290.

DOI:10.1080/00223980.2013.806290
PMID:24946388
Abstract

The aim of this study is to extend the Channel Model of Flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990) at the collective level (workgroups) by including collective efficacy beliefs as a predictor of collective flow based on the Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1997, 2001). A two-wave longitudinal lab study was conducted with 250 participants working in 52 small groups. Longitudinal results from Structural Equation Modeling with data aggregated at the group level showed, as expected, that collective efficacy beliefs predict collective flow over time, both being related reciprocally. Findings and their theoretical and practical implications in the light of Social Cognitive Theory are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在通过将集体效能信念纳入通道模型(Csikszentmihalyi,1975,1990),在集体层面(工作组)进行扩展,该模型将集体效能信念作为基于社会认知理论(Bandura,1997,2001)的集体流畅感的预测指标。采用两波纵向实验室研究,共 250 名参与者在 52 个小团体中工作。采用结构方程模型对数据进行汇总,结果显示,正如预期的那样,集体效能信念随着时间的推移预测集体流畅感,两者相互关联。根据社会认知理论,讨论了研究结果及其理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Flowing together: a longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups.融合共进:工作组集体效能与集体流畅感的纵向研究。
J Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;148(4):435-55. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.806290.
2
Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy.个体和集体社会认知对同伴攻击的影响:探究攻击效能、道德脱离和集体效能的贡献。
Aggress Behav. 2011 Mar-Apr;37(2):107-20. doi: 10.1002/ab.20375. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
3
Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.言行一致!通过群体愤怒和群体效能来解释集体行动倾向。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):649-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.
4
Self-efficacy, values, and complementarity in dyadic interactions: integrating interpersonal and social-cognitive theory.二元互动中的自我效能、价值观与互补性:整合人际理论与社会认知理论
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;33(1):94-109. doi: 10.1177/0146167206293375.
5
The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members' interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group contexts.在大学生群体情境中,感知到的任务相互依存性和群体成员的相互依存性在集体效能感发展中的作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Sep;78(Pt 3):375-93. doi: 10.1348/000709907X240471. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
6
Exploring the relationships between collective efficacy, perceptions of success, and team attributions.探究集体效能感、成功认知与团队归因之间的关系。
J Sports Sci. 2008 Sep;26(11):1179-89. doi: 10.1080/02640410802101827.
7
Collective motivation beliefs of early adolescents working in small groups.早期青少年在小组中工作的集体动机信念。
J Sch Psychol. 2009 Apr;47(2):101-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.11.002. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
8
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.迈向集体行动的综合社会认同模型:三种社会心理学视角的定量研究综述
Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):504-35. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
9
When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: the roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning.当高成就者和低成就者在同一小组中工作时:基于项目的学习中小组异质性和过程的作用。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Jun;78(Pt 2):205-21. doi: 10.1348/000709907X218160. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
10
The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective.团队中集体效能的发展:多层次纵向视角
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):17-27. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.17.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for neurophysiological experiments on flow states.关于心流状态的神经生理学实验框架。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jul 18;2(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00115-3.
2
Founders' flow: A qualitative study on the role of flow experience in early start-up stages.创始人的流畅体验:一项关于流畅体验在早期创业阶段作用的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292580. eCollection 2023.
3
Physiological synchrony and shared flow state in Javanese gamelan: positively associated while improvising, but not for traditional performance.
爪哇甘美兰音乐中的生理同步与共享心流状态:在即兴演奏时呈正相关,但在传统表演时并非如此。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1214505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214505. eCollection 2023.
4
A Scoping Review of Flow Research.流量研究的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 7;13:815665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815665. eCollection 2022.
5
Calm Down and Enjoy It: Influence of Leader-Employee Mindfulness on Flow Experience.冷静下来并享受它:领导-员工正念对心流体验的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Apr 8;15:839-854. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S360880. eCollection 2022.
6
Personal Competition Among Sports Players and Their Performance as a Team: A Moderated Mediation Model.运动员个人竞争与其团队表现:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:862599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862599. eCollection 2022.
7
Optimal Experience in Adult Learning: Conception and Validation of the Flow in Education Scale (EduFlow-2).成人学习中的最优体验:教育心流量表(EduFlow-2)的构想与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 30;12:828027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.828027. eCollection 2021.
8
Team Building Through Team Video Games: Randomized Controlled Trial.通过团队电子游戏进行团队建设:随机对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Dec 14;9(4):e28896. doi: 10.2196/28896.
9
Team Flow Is a Unique Brain State Associated with Enhanced Information Integration and Interbrain Synchrony.团队流是一种独特的大脑状态,与增强的信息整合和大脑间同步有关。
eNeuro. 2021 Oct 12;8(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0133-21.2021. Print 2021 Sep-Oct.
10
Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human-Robot Interaction - A Model for Research on Task Allocation.人机交互中分配过程的心理效应——一种任务分配研究模型
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:564672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564672. eCollection 2020.