Lemke J, von Karstedt S, Zinngrebe J, Walczak H
1] Centre for Cell Death, Cancer and Inflammation (CCCI), UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK [2] Clinic of General and Visceral Surgery, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Centre for Cell Death, Cancer and Inflammation (CCCI), UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Cell Death Differ. 2014 Sep;21(9):1350-64. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.81. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Unlike other members of the TNF superfamily, the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL, also known as Apo2L) possesses the unique capacity to induce apoptosis selectively in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. This exciting discovery provided the basis for the development of TRAIL-receptor agonists (TRAs), which have demonstrated robust anticancer activity in a number of preclinical studies. Subsequently initiated clinical trials testing TRAs demonstrated, on the one hand, broad tolerability but revealed, on the other, that therapeutic benefit was rather limited. Several factors that are likely to account for TRAs' sobering clinical performance have since been identified. First, because of initial concerns over potential hepatotoxicity, TRAs with relatively weak agonistic activity were selected to enter clinical trials. Second, although TRAIL can induce apoptosis in several cancer cell lines, it has now emerged that many others, and importantly, most primary cancer cells are resistant to TRAIL monotherapy. Third, so far patients enrolled in TRA-employing clinical trials were not selected for likelihood of benefitting from a TRA-comprising therapy on the basis of a valid(ated) biomarker. This review summarizes and discusses the results achieved so far in TRA-employing clinical trials in the light of these three shortcomings. By integrating recent insight on apoptotic and non-apoptotic TRAIL signaling in cancer cells, we propose approaches to introduce novel, revised TRAIL-based therapeutic concepts into the cancer clinic. These include (i) the use of recently developed highly active TRAs, (ii) the addition of efficient, but cancer-cell-selective TRAIL-sensitizing agents to overcome TRAIL resistance and (iii) employing proteomic profiling to uncover resistance mechanisms. We envisage that this shall enable the design of effective TRA-comprising therapeutic concepts for individual cancer patients in the future.
与肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)超家族的其他成员不同,肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL,也称为Apo2L)具有在体外和体内选择性诱导癌细胞凋亡的独特能力。这一令人兴奋的发现为TRAIL受体激动剂(TRA)的开发奠定了基础,在多项临床前研究中,TRA已显示出强大的抗癌活性。随后启动的测试TRA的临床试验表明,一方面其具有广泛的耐受性,但另一方面也显示出治疗益处相当有限。此后,已经确定了几个可能导致TRA令人清醒的临床疗效的因素。首先,由于最初担心潜在的肝毒性,选择了具有相对较弱激动活性的TRA进入临床试验。其次,尽管TRAIL可以在几种癌细胞系中诱导凋亡,但现在发现许多其他细胞系,重要的是,大多数原发性癌细胞对TRAIL单一疗法具有抗性。第三,到目前为止,参与使用TRA的临床试验的患者并没有根据有效的(验证的)生物标志物来选择可能从包含TRA的治疗中受益的人群。本综述根据这三个缺点总结并讨论了迄今为止在使用TRA的临床试验中取得的结果。通过整合对癌细胞中凋亡和非凋亡TRAIL信号传导的最新见解,我们提出了将基于TRAIL的新型改良治疗概念引入癌症临床的方法。这些方法包括:(i)使用最近开发的高活性TRA;(ii)添加有效但癌细胞选择性的TRAIL增敏剂以克服TRAIL抗性;(iii)采用蛋白质组学分析来揭示抗性机制。我们设想,这将使未来能够为个体癌症患者设计有效的包含TRA的治疗方案。