Tan Edwin C K, Visvanathan Renuka, Hilmer Sarah N, Vitry Agnes I, Quirke Tara, Emery Tina, Robson Leonie, Shortt Terry, Sheldrick Simon, Lee Sunny Soon Won, Clothier Robyn, Reeve Emily, Gnjidic Danijela, Ilomäki Jenni, Bell J Simon
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Discipline of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia Aged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 19;4(6):e005757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005757.
People living with dementia may experience and express pain in different ways to people without dementia. People with dementia are typically prescribed fewer analgesics than people without dementia indicating a potential difference in how pain is identified and treated in these populations. The objectives of this study are to (1) investigate the prevalence of analgesic load, pain and daytime sedation in people with and without dementia in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs), and (2) investigate the clinical and diagnostic associations between analgesic load, pain and daytime sedation in people with and without dementia in Australian RACFs.
METHODS/ANALYSIS: This will be a cross-sectional study of 300 permanent residents of up to 10 low-level and high-level RACFs in South Australia with and without dementia. Trained study nurses will administer validated and dementia-specific assessments of self-reported and clinician-observed pain, sedation and other clinical and humanistic outcomes. Medicine-use data will be extracted directly from each resident's medication administration chart. Binary and multinominal logistic regression will be used to compute unadjusted and adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for factors associated with pain, analgesic load and daytime sedation. These factors will include dementia severity, behavioural and psychological symptoms, quality of life, resident satisfaction, attitudes towards medicines, activities of daily living and nutritional status.
Institutional ethics approval has been granted. The findings will be disseminated through public lectures, professional and scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journal articles. The findings of this study will allow for a better understanding of the prevalence and factors associated with analgesic use, pain and other outcomes in residential care. The findings of this study will be used to inform the development and implementation of strategies to improve the quality of life of people with dementia.
与非痴呆患者相比,痴呆患者可能会以不同方式体验和表达疼痛。与非痴呆患者相比,痴呆患者通常使用的镇痛药较少,这表明在这些人群中识别和治疗疼痛的方式可能存在差异。本研究的目的是:(1)调查澳大利亚老年护理机构(RACF)中患有和未患有痴呆症的人群的镇痛药物负荷、疼痛和日间镇静的患病率;(2)调查澳大利亚老年护理机构中患有和未患有痴呆症的人群的镇痛药物负荷、疼痛和日间镇静之间的临床和诊断关联。
方法/分析:这将是一项横断面研究,研究对象为南澳大利亚州多达10所低级别和高级别老年护理机构的300名常住居民,包括患有和未患有痴呆症的居民。经过培训的研究护士将对自我报告和临床医生观察到的疼痛、镇静以及其他临床和人文结果进行经过验证的、针对痴呆症的评估。用药数据将直接从每位居民的用药管理记录中提取。二元和多项逻辑回归将用于计算与疼痛、镇痛药物负荷和日间镇静相关因素的未调整和调整后的比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。这些因素将包括痴呆严重程度、行为和心理症状、生活质量、居民满意度、对药物的态度、日常生活活动和营养状况。
已获得机构伦理批准。研究结果将通过公开讲座、专业和科学会议以及同行评审期刊文章进行传播。本研究的结果将有助于更好地了解老年护理中与镇痛药物使用、疼痛和其他结果相关的患病率及因素。本研究的结果将用于为改善痴呆患者生活质量的策略的制定和实施提供信息。