• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较诊断试验中的最佳抽样比例。

Optimal sampling ratios in comparative diagnostic trials.

作者信息

Dong Ting, Tang Liansheng Larry, Rosenberger William F

机构信息

George Mason University, Fairfax, USA.

出版信息

J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2014 Apr;63(3):499-514. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12043.

DOI:10.1111/rssc.12043
PMID:24948841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4060451/
Abstract

A subjective sampling ratio between the case and the control groups is not always an efficient choice to maximize the power or to minimize the total required sample size in comparative diagnostic trials.We derive explicit expressions for an optimal sampling ratio based on a common variance structure shared by several existing summary statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curve. We propose a two-stage procedure to estimate adaptively the optimal ratio without pilot data. We investigate the properties of the proposed method through theoretical proofs, extensive simulation studies and a real example in cancer diagnostic studies.

摘要

在比较诊断试验中,病例组与对照组之间采用主观抽样比例并非总是最大化检验效能或最小化所需总样本量的有效选择。我们基于接收器操作特征曲线的几个现有汇总统计量共有的方差结构,推导出最优抽样比例的显式表达式。我们提出一种两阶段程序,无需预试验数据即可自适应估计最优比例。我们通过理论证明、广泛的模拟研究以及癌症诊断研究中的一个实际例子,研究了所提方法的性质。

相似文献

1
Optimal sampling ratios in comparative diagnostic trials.比较诊断试验中的最佳抽样比例。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2014 Apr;63(3):499-514. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12043.
2
Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.经验性接收者操作特征曲线下部分面积的刀切法方差
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):528-541. doi: 10.1177/0962280214551190. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Optimal two-phase sampling for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.用于估计受试者工作特征曲线下面积的最优两阶段抽样
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 20;40(4):1059-1071. doi: 10.1002/sim.8819. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Sample size recalculation in sequential diagnostic trials.序贯诊断试验中的样本量重算。
Biostatistics. 2010 Jan;11(1):151-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp044. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
5
The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.用于估计生物标志物分类准确性的病例与对照的最佳比例。
Biostatistics. 2006 Jul;7(3):456-68. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj018. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
6
A simple method to estimate the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve with right censored data.一种简单的方法来估计时间依赖的接收者操作特性曲线和右删失数据的曲线下面积。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2264-2278. doi: 10.1177/0962280216680239. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
8
Optimal two-phase sampling for comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.在存在验证偏倚的情况下,用于比较两种筛查试验的ROC曲线下相关区域的最优两阶段抽样
J Biopharm Stat. 2025;35(4):624-640. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2358803. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
9
Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.利用复杂调查数据估计ROC曲线。
Stat Med. 2015 Apr 15;34(8):1293-303. doi: 10.1002/sim.6405. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
Evaluating and comparing biomarkers with respect to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in two-phase case-control studies.在两阶段病例对照研究中,根据受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估和比较生物标志物。
Biostatistics. 2016 Jul;17(3):499-522. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw003. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.根据数字制造商比较软拷贝数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影的准确性:ACRIN DMIST回顾性多阅片者研究
Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):38-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070418.
2
Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests.用于比较诊断试验准确性的非参数和半参数序贯分组方法。
Biometrics. 2008 Dec;64(4):1137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01000.x. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
3
Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.分类准确性研究中的匹配:对增量价值分析、效率及评估的影响
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00823.x. Epub 2007 May 14.
4
The optimal ratio of cases to controls for estimating the classification accuracy of a biomarker.用于估计生物标志物分类准确性的病例与对照的最佳比例。
Biostatistics. 2006 Jul;7(3):456-68. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj018. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
5
Two-stage sample size re-estimation based on a nuisance parameter: a review.基于干扰参数的两阶段样本量重新估计:综述
J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15(4):559-74. doi: 10.1081/BIP-200062852.
6
Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer.结合生物标志物进行疾病检测及其在前列腺癌中的应用。
Biostatistics. 2003 Oct;4(4):523-38. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.4.523.
7
Group sequential design for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.用于比较诊断准确性研究的序贯设计组。
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):727-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.1386.
8
Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.用于癌症早期检测的生物标志物开发阶段。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jul 18;93(14):1054-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054.
9
Incorporating the time dimension in receiver operating characteristic curves: a case study of prostate cancer.将时间维度纳入接收者操作特征曲线:前列腺癌的案例研究
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jul-Sep;19(3):242-51. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900303.
10
Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curve estimation from continuous data: statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones.基于连续数据的原始平滑接受者操作特征曲线估计:分析输尿管结石螺旋CT预测价值的统计方法
Acad Radiol. 1998 Oct;5(10):680-7. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(98)80562-x.