• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从童年到青年期的同伴关系路径。

Pathways of Peer Relationships from Childhood to Young Adulthood.

作者信息

Lansford Jennifer E, Yu Tianyi, Pettit Gregory S, Bates John E, Dodge Kenneth A

机构信息

Duke University.

University of Georgia.

出版信息

J Appl Dev Psychol. 2014 Mar;35(2):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.12.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.12.002
PMID:24948845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4060826/
Abstract

This study examined trajectories of peer social preference during childhood and personality assessed in early adolescence in relation to trajectories of friendship quality during early adulthood. Participants ( = 585) were followed from age 5 to age 23. At ages 5 to 8, peers provided sociometric nominations; at age 12 participants reported their own personality characteristics; from age 19 to 23 participants rated their friendship quality. Latent growth modeling revealed that trajectories characterized by high levels of childhood peer social preference were related to trajectories characterized by high levels of early adulthood friendship quality. Early adolescent personality characterized by extraversion and conscientiousness predicted higher friendship quality at age 19, and conscientiousness predicted change in friendship quality from age 19 to 23. This study demonstrates that peer relationships show continuity from childhood to early adulthood and that qualities of core personality are linked to the development of adult friendships.

摘要

本研究考察了童年时期同伴社会偏好的轨迹以及青春期早期评估的人格与成年早期友谊质量轨迹之间的关系。585名参与者从5岁到23岁被跟踪随访。在5至8岁时,同伴提供社会测量提名;12岁时,参与者报告自己的人格特征;19至23岁时,参与者对自己的友谊质量进行评分。潜在增长模型显示,以高水平童年同伴社会偏好为特征的轨迹与以高水平成年早期友谊质量为特征的轨迹相关。以外向性和尽责性为特征的青春期早期人格预测了19岁时更高的友谊质量,尽责性预测了19至23岁间友谊质量的变化。本研究表明,同伴关系从童年到成年早期具有连续性,核心人格特质与成年期友谊的发展相关。

相似文献

1
Pathways of Peer Relationships from Childhood to Young Adulthood.从童年到青年期的同伴关系路径。
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2014 Mar;35(2):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.12.002.
2
An Examination of Reciprocal Associations Between Social Preference, Popularity, and Friendship during Early Adolescence.青少年早期社会偏好、受欢迎程度和友谊之间的互惠关系研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Sep;47(9):1830-1841. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0846-1. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
3
Friendships in middle childhood: Links to peer and school identification, and general self-worth.儿童中期的友谊:与同伴和学校认同的关系,以及一般的自我价值感。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Jun;37(2):211-229. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12268. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
The Interchangeability of Liking and Friend Nominations to Measure Peer Acceptance and Friendship.用于衡量同伴接纳和友谊的喜欢与朋友提名的互换性
Int J Behav Dev. 2022 Jul;46(4):358-367. doi: 10.1177/01650254221084097. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Do stimulation and support in the early childhood home environment and best friendship quality in adolescence predict adult personality?幼儿期家庭环境中的刺激与支持以及青少年时期的最佳友谊质量能否预测成年后的人格?
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;11(2):87-97. doi: 10.5114/cipp/156764. eCollection 2023.
6
Factors impacting the quality of peer relationships of youth with Tourette's syndrome.影响青少年抽动秽语综合征患者同伴关系质量的因素。
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 30;3:34. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0090-3.
7
Dispositional, demographic, and social predictors of trajectories of intimate partner aggression in early adulthood.成年早期亲密伴侣攻击行为轨迹的性格、人口统计学和社会预测因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Oct;85(10):950-965. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000226. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
The interplay between adolescent friendship quality and resilient functioning following childhood and adolescent adversity.童年和青少年时期经历逆境后,青少年友谊质量与恢复力功能之间的相互作用。
Advers Resil Sci. 2021 Mar;2(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s42844-020-00027-1. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Pathways From Childhood Sociomoral Sensitivity in Friendship, Insecurity, and Peer Rejection to Adult Friendship Quality.从童年友谊中的社会道德敏感性、不安全感和同伴拒绝到成年友谊质量的途径。
Child Dev. 2020 Sep;91(5):e1012-e1029. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13381. Epub 2020 Jul 5.
10
Developmental Trajectories of Shyness-Sensitivity from Middle Childhood to Early Adolescence in China: Contributions of Peer Preference and Mutual Friendship.中国儿童中期到青少年早期害羞-敏感的发展轨迹:同伴偏好和互惠友谊的贡献。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;47(7):1197-1209. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-00507-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent, peer, or teacher? Examining how different social support systems buffer children's emotional responses to online peer rejection.父母、同龄人还是老师?探究不同的社会支持系统如何缓冲儿童对网络同龄人排斥的情绪反应。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02893-9.
2
The Helpfulness of Web-Based Mental Health and Well-being Forums for Providing Peer Support for Young People: Cross-sectional Exploration.基于网络的心理健康与幸福论坛对青少年提供同伴支持的作用:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 9;6(9):e36432. doi: 10.2196/36432.
3
Effect of family-related adverse childhood experiences on self-rated health in childhood and adulthood--childhood friendships as moderator.家庭相关的童年不良经历对儿童期和成年期自评健康的影响——童年友谊作为调节因素
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 6;14:100762. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100762. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Opioid misuse during late adolescence and its effects on risk behaviors, social functioning, health, and emerging adult roles.青少年晚期阿片类药物滥用及其对风险行为、社交功能、健康和成年早期角色的影响。
Addict Behav. 2021 Feb;113:106696. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106696. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Individual and Environmental Predictors of Age of First Intercourse and Number of Children by Age 27.首次性行为年龄及27岁时子女数量的个体和环境预测因素
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 8;11:1639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01639. eCollection 2020.
6
The Interplay of Adolescents' Aggression and Victimization with Friendship and Antipathy Networks within an Educational Prosocial Intervention.青少年的攻击性和受害性与教育亲社会干预中的友谊和敌意网络的相互作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Oct;48(10):2005-2022. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01105-z. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders: Evidence for Gene × Environment × Development interaction.反社会同伴关系与外化障碍:基因×环境×发展相互作用的证据。
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Feb;29(1):155-172. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000109. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Friendship Quality, Peer Group Affiliation, and Peer Antisocial Behavior as Moderators of the Link Between Negative Parenting and Adolescent Externalizing Behavior.友谊质量、同伴群体归属以及同伴反社会行为作为消极教养与青少年外化行为之间联系的调节因素
J Res Adolesc. 2003 May 1;13(2):161-184. doi: 10.1111/1532-7795.1302002.
2
Early adolescents' social standing in peer groups: behavioral correlates of stability and change.青少年早期在同龄人群体中的社会地位:稳定性和变化的行为关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Sep;38(8):1084-95. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9410-3. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
3
Developmental trajectories of perceived friendship intimacy, constructive problem solving, and depression from early to late adolescence.从青春期早期到晚期,感知到的友谊亲密度、建设性问题解决能力和抑郁的发展轨迹。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Feb;37(2):251-64. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9273-1.
4
The importance of conscientiousness in adolescent interpersonal relationships.尽责性在青少年人际关系中的重要性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;33(3):368-83. doi: 10.1177/0146167206296104.
5
Why do friendships matter for survival?为什么友谊对生存至关重要?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jul;59(7):538-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031542.
6
Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction.情绪调节能力与社交互动质量。
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):113-8. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113.
7
Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: measurement, development, and consequences.童年和青少年时期的人格差异:测量、发展及后果
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;44(1):2-32. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00101.
8
Missing data: our view of the state of the art.缺失数据:我们对当前技术水平的看法。
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77.
9
The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies.人格特质从童年到老年的等级顺序一致性:纵向研究的定量综述。
Psychol Bull. 2000 Jan;126(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.
10
Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes.气质与性格:起源与结果
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):122-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.122.