• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分类健康信息技术相关的患者安全事件——威尔士采用的方法。

Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales.

机构信息

Nursing and Social Care Information Directorate, NHS Wales Informatics Service, Pencoed, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Jun 27;3(2):248-57. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0010. Print 2012.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0010
PMID:23646074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3613022/
Abstract

Interest in the field of patient safety incident reporting and analysis with respect to Health Information Technology (HIT) has been growing over recent years as the development, implementation and reliance on HIT systems becomes ever more prevalent. One of the rationales for capturing patient safety incidents is to learn from failures in the delivery of care and must form part of a feedback loop which also includes analysis; investigation and monitoring. With the advent of new technologies and organizational programs of delivery the emphasis is increasingly upon analyzing HIT incidents. This thematic review had two objectives, to test the applicability of a framework specifically designed to categorize HIT incidents and to review the Welsh incidents as communicated via the national incident reporting system in order to understand their implications for healthcare. The incidents were those reported as IT/ telecommunications failure/ overload. Incidents were searched for within a national reporting system using a standardized search strategy for incidents occurring between 1(st) January 2009 and 31(st) May 2011. 149 incident reports were identified and classified. The majority (77%) of which were machine related (technical problems) such as access problems; computer system down/too slow; display issues; and software malfunctions. A further 10% (n = 15) of incidents were down to human-computer interaction issues and 13% (n = 19) incidents, mainly telephone related, could not be classified using the framework being tested. On the basis of this review of incidents, it is recommended that the framework be expanded to include hardware malfunctions and the wrong record retrieved/missing data associated with a machine output error (as opposed to human error). In terms of the implications for clinical practice, the incidents reviewed highlighted critical issues including the access problems particularly relating to the use of mobile technologies.

摘要

近年来,随着医疗信息技术(HIT)的发展、实施和依赖程度越来越高,人们对与 HIT 相关的患者安全事件报告和分析领域的兴趣日益浓厚。捕捉患者安全事件的原因之一是要从护理服务的失败中吸取教训,这必须成为反馈循环的一部分,该反馈循环还包括分析、调查和监测。随着新技术和新的组织交付计划的出现,重点越来越多地放在分析 HIT 事件上。本次专题审查有两个目标,一是测试专门设计用于对 HIT 事件进行分类的框架的适用性,二是审查通过国家事件报告系统通报的威尔士事件,以了解其对医疗保健的影响。这些事件是指报告的 IT/电信故障/过载事件。在全国报告系统中,使用针对 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 5 月 31 日期间发生的事件的标准化搜索策略,对事件进行搜索。共确定并分类了 149 起事件报告。其中大多数(77%)与机器相关(技术问题),例如访问问题;计算机系统关闭/太慢;显示问题;和软件故障。另有 10%(n=15)的事件是由于人机交互问题,而 13%(n=19)的事件,主要与电话相关,无法使用正在测试的框架进行分类。基于对事件的审查,建议扩展框架,将硬件故障以及与机器输出错误(而不是人为错误)相关的错误记录检索/缺少数据包括在内。就对临床实践的影响而言,所审查的事件突出了一些关键问题,包括访问问题,特别是与移动技术的使用有关的问题。

相似文献

1
Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales.分类健康信息技术相关的患者安全事件——威尔士采用的方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Jun 27;3(2):248-57. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0010. Print 2012.
2
The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales.与医疗信息技术故障相关的 2627 起患者安全事件的影响和可预防措施:对英格兰和威尔士 10 年来事件报告的回顾性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jul;1(3):e127-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30057-3. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.英格兰和威尔士初级医疗中涉及患病儿童的患者安全事件:一项混合方法分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 17;14(1):e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002217. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification.分析与计算机相关的患者安全事件,为分类的制定提供信息。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):663-70. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002444.
5
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
6
7
What do radiology incident reports reveal about in-hospital communication processes and the use of health information technology?放射学事件报告揭示了关于医院内沟通流程以及健康信息技术使用的哪些情况?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;178:213-8.
8
Building Usability Knowledge for Health Information Technology: A Usability-Oriented Analysis of Incident Reports.构建健康信息技术的可用性知识:基于可用性的事件报告分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):395-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691841. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care Dentistry in England and Wales: A Mixed-Methods Study.英格兰和威尔士初级保健牙科中的患者安全事件:一项混合方法研究。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1383-e1393. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000530.
10
A review of safety incidents in England and Wales for vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor medications.英国和威尔士血管内皮生长因子抑制剂药物安全性事件回顾。
Eye (Lond). 2011 Jun;25(6):710-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.89. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for a refined classification system and national incident reporting system for health information technology-related incidents.对卫生信息技术相关事件建立完善的分类系统和国家事件报告系统的需求。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jul 26;6:1422396. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1422396. eCollection 2024.
2
Characterizing patient details-related challenges from health information technology-related incident reports from Swedish healthcare.从瑞典医疗保健领域与健康信息技术相关的事件报告中梳理与患者细节有关的挑战。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 6;6:1260521. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1260521. eCollection 2024.
3
Characterization of Safety Events Involving Technology in Primary and Community Care.技术在初级和社区保健中引发的安全事件的特征描述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):1008-1017. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777454. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Preliminary Exploration of Main Elements for Systematic Classification Development: Case Study of Patient Safety Incidents.系统分类发展主要要素的初步探索:以患者安全事件为例
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 29;6(3):e35474. doi: 10.2196/35474.
5
Development of a Taxonomy for Medication-Related Patient Safety Events Related to Health Information Technology in Pediatrics.开发儿科中与医疗信息技术相关的药物相关患者安全事件分类法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Oct;11(5):714-724. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717084. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
Effect of an Alternative Newborn Naming Strategy on Wrong-Patient Errors: A Quasi-Experimental Study.替代新生儿命名策略对患者错误的影响:一项准实验研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Mar;11(2):235-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705175. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Building Usability Knowledge for Health Information Technology: A Usability-Oriented Analysis of Incident Reports.构建健康信息技术的可用性知识:基于可用性的事件报告分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):395-408. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691841. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Technology-induced errors associated with computerized provider order entry software for older patients.与老年患者的计算机化医嘱录入软件相关的技术引发的错误。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):729-742. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0474-y. Epub 2017 May 24.
9
Exploring Workarounds Related to Electronic Health Record System Usage: A Study Protocol.探索与电子健康记录系统使用相关的变通方法:一项研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Apr 28;6(4):e72. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6766.
10
Outcomes of medical malpractice claims in assisted reproductive technology over a 10-year period from a single carrier.来自单一机构的10年辅助生殖技术医疗事故索赔结果。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Apr;34(4):459-463. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0889-3. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of Reported Clinical Information System Adverse Events in US Food and Drug Administration Databases.美国食品药品监督管理局数据库中报告的临床信息系统不良事件综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2(1):63-74. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2010-11-RA-0064.
2
Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.利用 FDA 报告为健康信息技术安全问题提供分类依据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
3
An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification.分析与计算机相关的患者安全事件,为分类的制定提供信息。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):663-70. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002444.
4
The elephant of patient safety: what you see depends on how you look.患者安全这头“大象”:你所看到的取决于你观察的方式。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep;36(9):399-401. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36058-2.
5
Multilayered approach to patient safety culture.患者安全文化的多层方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029793. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
6
Introducing new technology safely.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19 Suppl 2:i9-14. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038554.
7
Making existing technology safer in healthcare.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19 Suppl 2:i15-24. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038539.
8
Conceptualising barriers to incident reporting: a psychological framework.概念化事件报告的障碍:一个心理学框架。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e60. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030445. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
9
Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework.安全使用电子健康记录需要一个全面的监测和评估框架。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 3;303(5):450-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.61.
10
Improving patient safety incident reporting systems by focusing upon feedback - lessons from English and Welsh trusts.通过关注反馈来改进患者安全事件报告系统——来自英格兰和威尔士信托机构的经验教训。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2009 Aug;22(3):129-35. doi: 10.1258/hsmr.2008.008019.