Schwabl Philipp, Bota Simona, Salzl Petra, Mandorfer Mattias, Payer Berit A, Ferlitsch Arnulf, Stift Judith, Wrba Friedrich, Trauner Michael, Peck-Radosavljevic Markus, Reiberger Thomas
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Liver Int. 2015 Feb;35(2):381-90. doi: 10.1111/liv.12623. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transient elastography (TE) can non-invasively diagnose cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PHT). New TE reliability criteria suggest classifying measurements as very reliable (IQR/M < 0.1), reliable (IQR<0.3 or >0.3, if TE < 7.1 kPa) and poorly reliable (IQR/M > 0.3, if TE > 7.1 kPa). Compare traditional (reliable: success rate >60% + IQR/M ≤ 0.30) and new TE quality criteria (accurate: very reliable + reliable) regarding their diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosis and PHT and to identify potential confounders (age, aetiology, necroinflammatory activity, steatosis, siderosis, cholestasis, aminotransferases) of TE performance.
Patients undergoing simultaneous measurements of TE, portal pressure (hepatic venous pressure gradient, HVPG) and liver biopsy were analysed.
Among 226 patients (48.7 ± 13.1 years, 74.7% male, 75.7% viral aetiology, 57% F3/F4), traditional TE quality criteria identified 71.6% reliable measurements, while new criteria yielded in 83.2% accurate results. Reliable TE values according to both criteria significantly correlated with fibrosis stage (r = 0.648 vs. r = 0.636) and HVPG (r = 0.836 vs. r = 0.846). Diagnostic accuracy for cirrhosis (cut-off >14.5 kPa) was 76.5% (AUC: 0.863) and 75.0% (AUC: 0.852) for traditional and new TE criteria, respectively, while for predicting HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg (>16.1 kPa), the accuracies were 88.9% (AUC: 0.957) and 89.8% (AUC: 0.962). New TE criteria allowed a better discrimination of reliable and non-reliable results for prediction of fibrosis and CSPH. Only aetiology and aminotransferases were independent confounders of the correlation of TE and fibrosis stage, while no confounder affected the correlation of TE and HVPG.
New reliability criteria for TE measurements increase the number of patients with accurate measurements without affecting diagnostic performance for detecting cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Aetiology of liver disease and aminotransferases should be considered when assessing liver fibrosis by TE.
瞬时弹性成像(TE)可用于非侵入性诊断肝硬化和门静脉高压(PHT)。新的TE可靠性标准建议将测量结果分类为非常可靠(IQR/M < 0.1)、可靠(IQR < 0.3或> 0.3,若TE < 7.1 kPa)以及可靠性差(IQR/M > 0.3,若TE > 7.1 kPa)。比较传统的(可靠:成功率> 60% + IQR/M ≤ 0.30)和新的TE质量标准(准确:非常可靠+可靠)在肝硬化和PHT诊断准确性方面的差异,并确定TE性能的潜在混杂因素(年龄、病因、坏死性炎症活动、脂肪变性、铁质沉着、胆汁淤积、转氨酶)。
对同时进行TE、门静脉压力(肝静脉压力梯度,HVPG)测量及肝活检的患者进行分析。
在226例患者中(48.7 ± 13.1岁,74.7%为男性,75.7%为病毒病因,57%为F3/F4),传统TE质量标准确定71.6%的测量结果可靠,而新标准得出83.2%的准确结果。根据两种标准得出的可靠TE值均与纤维化分期(r = 0.648对r = 0.636)和HVPG(r = 0.836对r = 0.846)显著相关。对于肝硬化(截断值> 14.5 kPa)的诊断准确性,传统和新TE标准分别为76.5%(AUC:0.863)和75.0%(AUC:0.852),而对于预测HVPG≥10 mmHg(> 16.1 kPa),准确性分别为88.9%(AUC:0.957)和89.8%(AUC:0.962)。新TE标准在预测纤维化和临床显著性门静脉高压时能更好地区分可靠和不可靠结果。仅病因和转氨酶是TE与纤维化分期相关性中的独立混杂因素,而没有混杂因素影响TE与HVPG的相关性。
TE测量的新可靠性标准增加了测量结果准确的患者数量,且不影响检测肝硬化和门静脉高压的诊断性能。通过TE评估肝纤维化时应考虑肝病病因和转氨酶。