O'Sullivan Teresa A, Danielson Jennifer, Weber Stanley S
University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):91. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78591.
To determine how colleges and schools of pharmacy interpreted the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE's) Standards 2007 definitions for core advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs), and how they differentiated community and institutional practice activities for introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs) and APPEs.
A cross-sectional, qualitative, thematic analysis was done of survey data obtained from experiential education directors in US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Open-ended responses to invited descriptions of the 4 core APPEs were analyzed using grounded theory to determine common themes. Type of college or school of pharmacy (private vs public) and size of program were compared.
Seventy-one schools (72%) with active APPE programs at the time of the survey responded. Lack of strong frequent themes describing specific activities for the acute care/general medicine core APPE indicated that most respondents agreed on the setting (hospital or inpatient) but the student experience remained highly variable. Themes were relatively consistent between public and private institutions, but there were differences across programs of varying size.
Inconsistencies existed in how colleges and schools of pharmacy defined the core APPEs as required by ACPE. More specific descriptions of core APPEs would help to standardize the core practice experiences across institutions and provide an opportunity for quality benchmarking.
确定药学院校如何解读药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)2007版标准中核心高级药学实践经验(APPE)的定义,以及它们如何区分基础药学实践经验(IPPE)和APPE中的社区与机构实践活动。
对从美国药学院校的实践教育主任处获得的调查数据进行横断面、定性的主题分析。使用扎根理论分析对4项核心APPE的受邀描述的开放式回复,以确定共同主题。比较药学院校的类型(私立与公立)和项目规模。
调查时有活跃APPE项目的71所学校(72%)进行了回复。缺乏描述急性护理/普通内科核心APPE具体活动的强烈且频繁出现的主题,表明大多数受访者对场所(医院或住院部)达成了一致,但学生的经历仍然高度可变。公立和私立机构之间的主题相对一致,但不同规模的项目之间存在差异。
药学院校在按照ACPE要求定义核心APPE的方式上存在不一致。对核心APPE进行更具体的描述将有助于规范各机构的核心实践经验,并提供质量基准的机会。