van Dijken Jan W V, Pallesen Ulla
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dent Mater. 2017 Aug;33(8):944-953. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 May 22.
The objective of this randomized controlled prospective trial was to evaluate the durability of a low shrinkage and TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system in posterior restorations in a 6-year follow up.
139 Class II restorations were placed in 67 patients with a mean age of 53 years (range 29-82). Each participant received at random two, as similar as possible, Class II restorations. In the first cavity of each pair the TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system was placed with its 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (cmf-els). In the second cavity a 1-step HEMA-free self-etch adhesive was used (AdheSe One F). The restorations were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and then yearly during 6 years. Caries risk and parafunctional habits of the participants were estimated.
Three molar teeth showed mild post-operative sensitivity during 3 weeks for temperature changes and occlusal forces. After 6 years, 134 Class II restorations were evaluated. Twenty-one restorations, 8 cmf-els (11.4%) and 13 ASE-els (20%) failed during the 6 years (p<0.0001). The annual failure rates were 1.9% and 3.3%, respectively. The main reasons for failure were fracture followed by recurrent caries. Most fractures and all caries lesions were found in high risk participants.
The Class II resin composite restorations performed with the new TEGDMA/HEMA-free low shrinkage resin composite system showed good durability over six years.
本随机对照前瞻性试验的目的是在6年的随访中评估一种低收缩率且不含TEGDMA/HEMA的树脂复合材料系统在后牙修复中的耐久性。
在67名平均年龄为53岁(范围29 - 82岁)的患者中放置了139个II类修复体。每位参与者随机接受两个尽可能相似的II类修复体。在每对修复体的第一个窝洞中,使用三步蚀刻冲洗粘合剂(cmf - els)放置不含TEGDMA/HEMA的树脂复合材料系统。在第二个窝洞中,使用一步不含HEMA的自酸蚀粘合剂(AdheSe One F)。在基线时使用略作修改的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评估,然后在6年期间每年评估一次。评估参与者的患龋风险和异常功能习惯。
三颗磨牙在术后3周内对温度变化和咬合力表现出轻度敏感。6年后,对134个II类修复体进行了评估。在6年期间,21个修复体失败,8个cmf - els修复体(11.4%)和13个ASE - els修复体(20%)(p<0.0001)。年失败率分别为1.9%和3.3%。失败的主要原因是折断,其次是继发龋。大多数折断和所有龋损均见于高风险参与者。
使用新型不含TEGDMA/HEMA的低收缩率树脂复合材料系统进行的II类树脂复合材料修复体在6年中表现出良好的耐久性。