• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知健康电池(NIHTB-CHB)在成年人中的因子结构、收敛效度和区分效度。

Factor structure, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults.

作者信息

Mungas Dan, Heaton Robert, Tulsky David, Zelazo Philip David, Slotkin Jerry, Blitz David, Lai Jin-Shei, Gershon Richard

机构信息

1Department of Neurology,University of California,Davis,California.

2Department of Psychiatry,University of California,San Diego,California.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):579-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000307. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1017/S1355617714000307
PMID:24960474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4103956/
Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the construct validity of the NIH Neurobehavioral Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the dimensional structure underlying the NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests chosen to serve as concurrent validity criteria for the NIHTB-CHB. These results were used to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB in adults ranging from 20 to 85 years of age. Five dimensions were found to explain the correlations among NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests: Vocabulary, Reading, Episodic Memory, Working Memory and Executive Function/Processing Speed. NIHTB-CHB measures and their Gold Standard analogues defined factors in a pattern that broadly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB tests. This 5-factor structure was found to be invariant across 20-60 year old (N=159) and 65-85 year old (N=109) age groups that were included in the current validity study. Second order Crystallized Abilities (Vocabulary and Reading) and Fluid Abilities (Episodic Memory, Working Memory, Executive/Speed) factors parsimoniously explained correlations among the five first order factors. These results suggest that the NIHTB-CHB will provide both fine-grained and broad characterization of cognition across the adult age span.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估美国国立卫生研究院神经行为工具箱认知健康电池(NIHTB-CHB)在成年人中的结构效度。验证性因素分析用于评估NIHTB-CHB的维度结构以及被选作NIHTB-CHB同时效度标准的金标准测试。这些结果用于评估NIHTB-CHB在20至85岁成年人中的聚合效度和区分效度。发现五个维度可以解释NIHTB-CHB与金标准测试之间的相关性:词汇、阅读、情景记忆、工作记忆和执行功能/处理速度。NIHTB-CHB测量指标及其金标准类似物以一种模式定义了因素,广泛支持了NIHTB-CHB测试的聚合效度和区分效度。在当前效度研究纳入的20至60岁(N = 159)和65至85岁(N = 109)年龄组中,发现这种五因素结构是不变的。二阶晶体能力(词汇和阅读)和流体能力(情景记忆、工作记忆、执行/速度)因素简洁地解释了五个一阶因素之间的相关性。这些结果表明,NIHTB-CHB将对成年年龄跨度内的认知提供细粒度和广泛的表征。

相似文献

1
Factor structure, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知健康电池(NIHTB-CHB)在成年人中的因子结构、收敛效度和区分效度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):579-87. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000307. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
2
Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in adults.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池组成人综合评分的信度和效度
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):588-98. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000241. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery (NIHTB-CB): the NIHTB Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知能力测试(NIHTB-CB):NIHTB模式比较处理速度测试。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):630-41. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000319. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
4
VII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): factor structure for 3 to 15 year olds.七、NIH 工具包认知电池 (CB):3 至 15 岁儿童的因子结构。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013 Aug;78(4):103-18. doi: 10.1111/mono.12037.
5
Construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in individuals with stroke.NIH 工具包认知电池在中风患者中的构念效度。
Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Nov;62(4):443-454. doi: 10.1037/rep0000195.
6
The cognition battery of the NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function: validation in an adult sample.用于评估神经和行为功能的美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知测试组:在成人样本中的验证
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):567-78. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000320. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Construct validity of the NIH toolbox cognitive domains: A comparison with conventional neuropsychological assessments.国立卫生研究院工具包认知领域的建构效度:与传统神经心理学评估的比较。
Neuropsychology. 2022 Jul;36(5):468-481. doi: 10.1037/neu0000813. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): validation of executive function measures in adults.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(CB):成人执行功能测量的验证
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):620-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000472. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB): list sorting test to measure working memory.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(NIHTB-CB):用于测量工作记忆的列表排序测试。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):599-610. doi: 10.1017/S135561771400040X. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
Language measures of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知成套测验的语言测量
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):642-51. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000411. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Social interactions and loneliness in daily life: A study of younger adults and cognitively diverse older adults.日常生活中的社交互动与孤独感:一项针对年轻人和认知能力各异的老年人的研究。
Dev Psychol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1037/dev0002069.
2
Exploring the link between National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognition Battery performance and everyday functioning in mild cognitive impairment.探索美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)工具箱认知评估电池测试表现与轻度认知障碍患者日常功能之间的联系。
Neuropsychology. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1037/neu0001034.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Use of the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery in Clinical Populations.对国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池在临床人群中的应用的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s11065-025-09669-3.
4
Intraindividual variability, subjective cognitive difficulties, and head injury history in former collegiate athletes.前大学运动员的个体内变异性、主观认知困难和头部受伤史。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Mar 24:1-21. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2025.2479213.
5
Emotion regulation success in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.有和没有轻度认知障碍的老年人的情绪调节成功情况。
Psychol Aging. 2025 May;40(3):278-293. doi: 10.1037/pag0000878. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
6
Social resources and emotional well-being in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.有和没有轻度认知障碍的老年人的社会资源与情绪健康
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Jun;29(6):1111-1122. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2025.2465781. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
7
Understanding the Link Between Functional Profiles and Intelligence Through Dimensionality Reduction and Graph Analysis.通过降维和图分析理解功能特征与智力之间的联系。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Feb 15;46(3):e70149. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70149.
8
How Often and Why Do People Manage Their Emotions in Older Adulthood?老年人管理情绪的频率及原因是什么?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf031.
9
The validity of studying healthy aging with cognitive tests measuring different constructs.用测量不同结构的认知测试来研究健康老龄化的有效性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 12;14(1):23880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74488-0.
10
Links Between Daily Life and Laboratory Emotion Regulation Processes: The Role of Age and Cognitive Status.日常生活与实验室情绪调节过程的联系:年龄和认知状态的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jul 1;79(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae073.

本文引用的文献

1
VII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): factor structure for 3 to 15 year olds.七、NIH 工具包认知电池 (CB):3 至 15 岁儿童的因子结构。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013 Aug;78(4):103-18. doi: 10.1111/mono.12037.
2
NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.NIH 神经行为功能评估工具包。
Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S2-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e5f.
3
Processing speed and executive functions in cognitive aging: how to disentangle their mutual relationship?认知老化中的加工速度和执行功能:如何厘清它们的相互关系?
Brain Cogn. 2012 Jun;79(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
4
Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons.神经心理学测验在不同老年人中的测量不变性。
Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):260-269. doi: 10.1037/a0021090.
5
Partial measurement equivalence of French and English versions of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging neuropsychological battery.加拿大健康与老龄化研究神经心理测试组法语版和英语版的部分测量等效性
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 May;15(3):416-25. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709090602.
6
Composite scores for executive function items: demographic heterogeneity and relationships with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.执行功能项目的综合得分:人口统计学异质性及其与定量磁共振成像的关系。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Sep;14(5):746-59. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708081162.
7
Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning.认知能力与执行功能测量之间的关系。
Neuropsychology. 2005 Jul;19(4):532-545. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.532.
8
The role of factor analysis in construct validity: is it a myth?因素分析在结构效度中的作用:这是一个神话吗?
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Nov;10(7):1018-9; author reply 1020-1. doi: 10.1017/s1355617704107091.
9
The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: lessons from memory assessment.使用因子分析或与正常或混合临床群体的相关性来检验结构效度的误区:记忆评估的教训
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Sep;9(6):936-46. doi: 10.1017/S1355617703960139.
10
The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.执行功能的统一性与多样性及其对复杂“额叶”任务的贡献:一项潜在变量分析
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.