Runk Ashlyn, Conaty Kayla, Calamia Matthew, Butters Meryl A, Gildengers Ariel
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh.
Neuropsychology. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1037/neu0001034.
Neuropsychologists routinely use scores on traditional paper-and-pencil tests to assess capacity for independent functioning, with these assessments accounting for a moderate amount (20%-37%) of the variance in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) performance. The field is shifting toward incorporation of computerized neuropsychological assessments such as the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). There have been no studies examining how the NIHTB-CB relates to IADL performance or whether it better predicts IADL performance compared to traditional methods.
Data from 74 participants in the Lithium as a Treatment to Prevent Impairment of Cognition in Elders were analyzed. Participants completed a neuropsychological assessment battery, the NIHTB-CB, and measures of IADL capacity. Linear regression was used to determine whether NIHTB-CB performance predicted IADL performance. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to determine whether NIHTB-CB added incremental validity to the prediction of IADL performance.
Select NIHTB-CB measures predicted IADL functioning as measured by a performance-based assessment of everyday functioning, but not self- or informant-reported everyday functioning. Of these subtests, two were found to add incremental validity to the prediction of IADL performance above and beyond their matched traditional measures, with effect sizes ranging from mild to moderate (Δ² = .045-.077).
We found performance on individual NIHTB-CB subtests predicted approximately the same amount of variance in IADL functioning as traditional tests, with only subtests assessing processing speed and executive functioning adding a mild to moderate amount of additional variance above matched measures. It remains important for clinicians to consider additional determinants of functioning when using computerized assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
神经心理学家经常使用传统纸笔测试的分数来评估独立功能能力,这些评估在日常生活工具性活动(IADL)表现的差异中占中等比例(20%-37%)。该领域正在转向纳入计算机化神经心理学评估,如美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(NIHTB-CB)。目前尚无研究探讨NIHTB-CB与IADL表现之间的关系,也没有研究探讨它与传统方法相比是否能更好地预测IADL表现。
对74名参与“锂预防老年人认知障碍治疗”研究的参与者的数据进行了分析。参与者完成了一套神经心理学评估、NIHTB-CB以及IADL能力测量。使用线性回归来确定NIHTB-CB表现是否能预测IADL表现。使用分层多元回归来确定NIHTB-CB是否能为IADL表现的预测增加额外的效度。
选择的NIHTB-CB测量指标能预测基于日常功能表现评估所测量的IADL功能,但不能预测自我报告或他人报告的日常功能。在这些子测试中,发现有两项子测试在预测IADL表现方面,除了其匹配的传统测量指标外,还增加了额外的效度,效应大小从轻度到中度不等(Δ² = .045-.077)。
我们发现,NIHTB-CB各个子测试的表现与传统测试在预测IADL功能方面所解释的差异量大致相同,只有评估处理速度和执行功能的子测试在匹配测量指标之外增加了轻度到中度的额外差异量。临床医生在使用计算机化评估时,考虑功能的其他决定因素仍然很重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)