• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.机器人辅助子宫切除术的新型端口放置及5毫米器械应用
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):167-73. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518399.
2
Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌女性患者——并发症、女性患者体验、生活质量及卫生经济学评估
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.在妇科中使用传统腹腔镜器械和手套端口技术的腹腔镜单孔手术:一位外科医生的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
5
Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.体重指数对机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.妇科机器人腹腔镜单孔手术:可行性、安全性和技术的前瞻性分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):179.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.057. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫内膜癌根治术用于患有子宫内膜癌的女性。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
8
Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.单孔机器人辅助子宫切除术的初步经验。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):476-480. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4134.
9
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
10
Outcomes in women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy at a tertiary hospital in Western Australia.在西澳大利亚一家三级医院,接受机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性与接受传统腹腔镜子宫切除术的女性的治疗结果比较。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;58(4):443-448. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12749. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
2
The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy.机器人子宫切除术的学习曲线。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):87-95. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827a029e.
3
Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery.
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(3-4):123-5.
4
Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.女性对微创手术切口的偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):640-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.比较机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:对成本和临床结局的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):730-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
6
Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial.经脐与经腹途径腹腔镜附件良性肿物取出术的比较:一项随机试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.029. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
7
Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience.有机器人辅助与无机器人辅助的腹腔镜子宫切除术:斯坦福大学的经验。
JSLS. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):125-8.
8
Natural orifice-assisted laparoscopic appendectomy.经自然腔道辅助腹腔镜阑尾切除术
JSLS. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):14-8.
9
Robotic trocar site small bowel evisceration after gynecologic cancer surgery.妇科癌症手术后机器人套管穿刺部位小肠脱出
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;112(2 Pt 2):462-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181719ba8.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术:技术与初步经验
Am J Surg. 2006 Apr;191(4):555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011.

机器人辅助子宫切除术的新型端口放置及5毫米器械应用

Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

作者信息

Nezhat Ceana H, Katz Adi, Dun Erica C, Kho Kimberly A, Wieser Friedrich A

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta Center for Reproductive Medicine, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, 5555 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Suite 276, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northshore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems, Manhasset, New York, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):167-73. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518399.

DOI:10.4293/108680813X13693422518399
PMID:24960478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4035625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The value of robotic surgery for gynecologic procedures has been critically evaluated over the past few years. Its drawbacks have been noted as larger port size, location of port placement, limited instrumentation, and cost. In this study, we describe a novel technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with 3 important improvements: (1) more aesthetic triangular laparoscopic port configuration, (2) use of 5-mm robotic cannulas and instruments, and (3) improved access around the robotic arms for the bedside assistant with the use of pediatric-length laparoscopic instruments.

METHODS

We reviewed a series of 44 women who underwent a novel RALH technique and concomitant procedures for benign hysterectomy between January 2008 and September 2011.

RESULTS

The novel RALH technique and concomitant procedures were completed in all of the cases without conversion to larger ports, laparotomy, or video-assisted laparoscopy. Mean age was 49.9 years (SD 8.8, range 33-70), mean body mass index was 26.1 (SD 5.1, range 18.9-40.3), mean uterine weight was 168.2 g (SD 212.7, range 60-1405), mean estimated blood loss was 69.7 mL (SD 146.9, range 20-1000), and median length of stay was <1 day (SD 0.6, range 0-2.5). There were no major and 3 minor peri- and postoperative complications, including 2 urinary tract infections and 1 case of intravenous site thrombophlebitis. Mean follow-up time was 40.0 months (SD 13.6, range 15-59).

CONCLUSION

Use of the triangular gynecology laparoscopic port placement and 5-mm robotic instruments for RALH is safe and feasible and does not impede the surgeon's ability to perform the procedures or affect patient outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

在过去几年中,机器人手术在妇科手术中的价值受到了严格评估。其缺点包括端口尺寸较大、端口放置位置、器械有限以及成本较高。在本研究中,我们描述了一种用于机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术(RALH)的新技术,该技术有3项重要改进:(1)更美观的三角形腹腔镜端口配置;(2)使用5毫米机器人套管和器械;(3)使用儿童长度的腹腔镜器械改善床边助手在机器人手臂周围的操作空间。

方法

我们回顾了2008年1月至2011年9月期间接受新型RALH技术及同期良性子宫切除术相关手术的44例女性患者。

结果

所有病例均成功完成了新型RALH技术及同期手术,未转为更大端口、开腹手术或视频辅助腹腔镜手术。平均年龄为49.9岁(标准差8.8,范围33 - 70岁),平均体重指数为26.1(标准差5.1,范围18.9 - 40.3),平均子宫重量为168.2克(标准差212.7,范围60 - 1405克),平均估计失血量为69.7毫升(标准差146.9,范围20 - 1000毫升),中位住院时间<1天(标准差0.6,范围0 - 2.5天)。无重大围手术期及术后并发症,有3例轻微并发症,包括2例尿路感染和1例静脉穿刺部位血栓性静脉炎。平均随访时间为40.0个月(标准差13.6,范围15 - 59个月)。

结论

将三角形妇科腹腔镜端口放置和5毫米机器人器械用于RALH是安全可行的,不会妨碍外科医生进行手术的能力,也不会影响患者的手术效果。