• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对微创手术切口的偏好。

Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.

机构信息

Swedish American Medical Group, Belvidere, IL 61008, USA.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):640-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009
PMID:21802378
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether traditional, robotic, or single-site laparoscopic incisions are more appealing to women.

DESIGN

Descriptive study using a survey (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Single-specialty referral-based gynecology practice.

PATIENTS

All patients older than 18 years who came for care to the Newton-Wellesley Hospital Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Center from April 2, 2010, to June 30, 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Three identical photos of an unscarred female abdomen were each marked with a black pen to indicate typical incision lengths and locations for robotic, single-site, and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Subjects were then asked to rank these incisions in order of preference. Additional demographic and surgical history questions were included in the survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two-hundred fifty of 427 patients (58.5%) returned surveys, and of these, 241 completed critical survey elements. Preference for traditional laparoscopic incisions was 56.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1%-62.7%), for a single incision was 41.1% (95% CI, 34.8%-47.3%), and for robotic surgery was 2.5% (95% CI, 0.5%-4.5%). Two-sample test of proportion (Z test) showed the difference in preference for traditional over the other methods to be significant: p = .007 for a single incision and p <.001 for robotic surgery. Multivariatble analysis for factors influencing choice of single-site incision demonstrated that Latina/Hispanic ethnicity was the only significant factor (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Women prefer both single-site and traditional laparoscopic incisions over robotic procedures. Inasmuch as aesthetics are an important consideration for many women and clinical outcomes are similar, during the informed-consent procedure, location and length of incisions should be included in the discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.

摘要

研究目的

确定传统、机器人辅助和单孔腹腔镜切口中,哪一种对女性更有吸引力。

设计

使用问卷调查进行的描述性研究(加拿大工作队分类 III)。

设置

单专科转诊为基础的妇科实践。

患者

2010 年 4 月 2 日至 6 月 30 日期间,所有到牛顿-韦尔斯利医院微创妇科手术中心就诊的年龄大于 18 岁的患者。

干预措施

三张未经疤痕处理的女性腹部照片,均用黑色笔标记出机器人辅助、单孔和传统腹腔镜手术的典型切口长度和位置。然后要求患者按照喜好程度对这些切口进行排序。调查中还包括其他人口统计学和手术史问题。

测量和主要结果

427 名患者中有 250 名(58.5%)返回了调查问卷,其中 241 名完成了关键调查内容。传统腹腔镜切口的偏好率为 56.4%(95%置信区间 [CI],50.1%-62.7%),单切口的偏好率为 41.1%(95% CI,34.8%-47.3%),机器人手术的偏好率为 2.5%(95% CI,0.5%-4.5%)。两样本比例检验(Z 检验)显示,传统切口与其他方法之间的偏好差异具有统计学意义:单切口的 p 值为.007,机器人手术的 p 值<.001。多变量分析影响单孔切口选择的因素表明,拉丁裔/西班牙裔是唯一的显著因素(p =.02)。

结论

女性更喜欢单孔和传统腹腔镜切口,而不是机器人手术。由于美观是许多女性的重要考虑因素,且临床结果相似,因此在知情同意过程中,切口的位置和长度应包括在风险、收益和替代方案的讨论中。

相似文献

1
Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.女性对微创手术切口的偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):640-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
2
Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery.妇科手术中腹部切口美容效果的患者偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
3
Women's preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery.女性对妇科手术后美容效果的偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004.
4
Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.盆底修复的腹腔镜、机器人及微创阴道手术进展
Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Jun;61(3):173-86.
5
Patient Preferences for Abdominal Incisions Used for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术腹部切口的患者偏好
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):348-54. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000186.
6
What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?机器人辅助妇科手术的学习曲线是怎样的?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.015.
7
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
8
Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.单孔腹腔镜及机器人辅助肾部分切除术
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.029. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
9
The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.机器人手术在妇科中的作用。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):331-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b.
10
Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.妇科肿瘤学中的微创手术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2 Suppl):S29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.025. Epub 2008 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical efficacy of single-incision and traditional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.单孔与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;12:997894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.997894. eCollection 2022.
2
Cosmetic Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared to Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynecologic Disease.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病的美容效果比较
JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00081.
3
Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.
单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效:一项单中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机临床试验
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 25;11:762147. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762147. eCollection 2021.
4
Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study.机器人单部位与多部位子宫肌瘤剔除术:病例对照研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 27;21(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01245-9.
5
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗子宫切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
6
Patient Perceptions of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gynecological Surgeries.患者对开放式、腹腔镜式和机器人辅助妇科手术的认知
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4284093. doi: 10.1155/2016/4284093. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.同轴机器人辅助腹腔镜单孔子宫肌瘤切除术
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0603-y. Epub 2016 May 10.
8
Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice.三维腹腔镜检查:原理与实践
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):165-169. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181761.
9
Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique.机器人辅助单切口腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:初步报告及技术
J Robot Surg. 2013 Jun;7(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0356-1. Epub 2012 May 31.
10
Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.机器人辅助子宫切除术的新型端口放置及5毫米器械应用
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):167-73. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518399.