Suppr超能文献

女性对微创手术切口的偏好。

Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.

机构信息

Swedish American Medical Group, Belvidere, IL 61008, USA.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):640-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 28.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether traditional, robotic, or single-site laparoscopic incisions are more appealing to women.

DESIGN

Descriptive study using a survey (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Single-specialty referral-based gynecology practice.

PATIENTS

All patients older than 18 years who came for care to the Newton-Wellesley Hospital Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Center from April 2, 2010, to June 30, 2010.

INTERVENTIONS

Three identical photos of an unscarred female abdomen were each marked with a black pen to indicate typical incision lengths and locations for robotic, single-site, and traditional laparoscopic surgery. Subjects were then asked to rank these incisions in order of preference. Additional demographic and surgical history questions were included in the survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two-hundred fifty of 427 patients (58.5%) returned surveys, and of these, 241 completed critical survey elements. Preference for traditional laparoscopic incisions was 56.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.1%-62.7%), for a single incision was 41.1% (95% CI, 34.8%-47.3%), and for robotic surgery was 2.5% (95% CI, 0.5%-4.5%). Two-sample test of proportion (Z test) showed the difference in preference for traditional over the other methods to be significant: p = .007 for a single incision and p <.001 for robotic surgery. Multivariatble analysis for factors influencing choice of single-site incision demonstrated that Latina/Hispanic ethnicity was the only significant factor (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Women prefer both single-site and traditional laparoscopic incisions over robotic procedures. Inasmuch as aesthetics are an important consideration for many women and clinical outcomes are similar, during the informed-consent procedure, location and length of incisions should be included in the discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.

摘要

研究目的

确定传统、机器人辅助和单孔腹腔镜切口中,哪一种对女性更有吸引力。

设计

使用问卷调查进行的描述性研究(加拿大工作队分类 III)。

设置

单专科转诊为基础的妇科实践。

患者

2010 年 4 月 2 日至 6 月 30 日期间,所有到牛顿-韦尔斯利医院微创妇科手术中心就诊的年龄大于 18 岁的患者。

干预措施

三张未经疤痕处理的女性腹部照片,均用黑色笔标记出机器人辅助、单孔和传统腹腔镜手术的典型切口长度和位置。然后要求患者按照喜好程度对这些切口进行排序。调查中还包括其他人口统计学和手术史问题。

测量和主要结果

427 名患者中有 250 名(58.5%)返回了调查问卷,其中 241 名完成了关键调查内容。传统腹腔镜切口的偏好率为 56.4%(95%置信区间 [CI],50.1%-62.7%),单切口的偏好率为 41.1%(95% CI,34.8%-47.3%),机器人手术的偏好率为 2.5%(95% CI,0.5%-4.5%)。两样本比例检验(Z 检验)显示,传统切口与其他方法之间的偏好差异具有统计学意义:单切口的 p 值为.007,机器人手术的 p 值<.001。多变量分析影响单孔切口选择的因素表明,拉丁裔/西班牙裔是唯一的显著因素(p =.02)。

结论

女性更喜欢单孔和传统腹腔镜切口,而不是机器人手术。由于美观是许多女性的重要考虑因素,且临床结果相似,因此在知情同意过程中,切口的位置和长度应包括在风险、收益和替代方案的讨论中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验