• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜、手辅助及开放手术肾输尿管切除术的比较

Comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open surgical nephroureterectomy.

作者信息

Kitamura Hiroshi, Maeda Toshihiro, Tanaka Toshiaki, Fukuta Fumimasa, Kobayashi Ko, Nishiyama Naotaka, Takahashi Satoshi, Masumori Naoya

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8543, Japan.

Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):288-93. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13794522666842.

DOI:10.4293/108680813X13794522666842
PMID:24960495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4035642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.

METHODS

Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, or open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Of these patients, 110 with no previous or concurrent bladder cancer or any metastatic disease were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 70 months (range, 6-192 months).

RESULTS

The 3 groups were well matched for tumor stage, grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.1%, 65.6%, and 65.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .4179). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.8%, 10.0%, and 41.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .0245). The estimated 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were 64.8%, 10.0%, and 76.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate among the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy groups, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may be inferior to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy with regard to recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后的肿瘤学结局。

方法

1995年4月至2010年8月期间,189例患者因上尿路尿路上皮癌接受了腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术或开放性肾输尿管切除术。其中,110例无既往或同时存在的膀胱癌或任何转移性疾病的患者被纳入本研究。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析癌症特异性生存率、无复发生存率及膀胱内无复发生存率,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。该队列的中位随访期为70个月(范围6 - 192个月)。

结果

三组在肿瘤分期、分级、淋巴管侵犯情况及伴发原位癌方面匹配良好。腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及开放性肾输尿管切除术的估计5年癌症特异性生存率分别为81.1%、65.6%和65.2%(P = 0.4179)。腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及开放性肾输尿管切除术的估计5年无复发生存率分别为33.8%、10.0%和41.2%(P = 0.0245)。腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及开放性肾输尿管切除术的估计5年膀胱内无复发生存率分别为64.8%、10.0%和76.2%(P < 0.0001)。

结论

虽然腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术及开放性肾输尿管切除术组之间的癌症特异性生存率无显著差异,但在手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的无复发生存率及膀胱内无复发生存率方面可能低于腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术或开放性肾输尿管切除术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/d526be6d1026/jls0041332360004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/a1620d16a34b/jls0041332360001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/e1b781f1454d/jls0041332360002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/07c8f028c65b/jls0041332360003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/d526be6d1026/jls0041332360004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/a1620d16a34b/jls0041332360001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/e1b781f1454d/jls0041332360002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/07c8f028c65b/jls0041332360003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3412/4035642/d526be6d1026/jls0041332360004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open surgical nephroureterectomy.腹腔镜、手辅助及开放手术肾输尿管切除术的比较
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):288-93. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13794522666842.
2
Oncologic Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖口切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌后的肿瘤学结局
J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.081. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌
JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):432-8.
4
Oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for pT3 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗pT3期上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014 Sep;66(3):157-64.
5
Intermediate-term oncological outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open bilateral nephroureterectomy for dialysis and kidney transplant patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.手辅助腹腔镜与开放双侧肾输尿管切除术治疗透析及肾移植的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的中期肿瘤学结局
J Endourol. 2009 Jul;23(7):1139-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0162.
6
Comparison of post-operative intravesical recurrence and oncological outcomes after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.开放性与腹腔镜下肾盂输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌术后膀胱内复发及肿瘤学结局的比较
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):565-70. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1160-x.
7
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌
Urology. 2000 Nov 1;56(5):741-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00751-2.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional-cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌的对比
J Endourol. 2001 May;15(4):391-5; discussion 397. doi: 10.1089/089277901300189402.
9
Long-term outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison with open surgery.手辅助腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期疗效:与开放手术的比较。
J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):595-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.9948.
10
Endoscopic versus laparoscopic management of noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20-year single center experience.内镜与腹腔镜治疗非浸润性上尿路尿路上皮癌:20 年单中心经验。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2054-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.006. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Safe and Effective Option for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Especially for Novice Surgeons.机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术:治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的一种安全有效的选择,尤其适用于新手外科医生。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;17(9):1394. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091394.
2
Prognostic effects of different nephroureterectomy techniques for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.不同肾输尿管切除术技术对上尿路尿路上皮癌的预后影响:一项网状Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13773-1.
3
Surgical outcome predictor analysis following hand-assisted or pure laparoscopic transperitoneal nephroureterectomy using the Taiwan upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma database.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的系统评价和累积分析比较研究。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1142-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
2
Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UCs): results from a large French multicenter collaborative study.开放与腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌(UUT-UCs)的肿瘤控制效果评估:来自一项大型法国多中心合作研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):301-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1841-x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
3
使用台湾上尿路尿路上皮癌数据库对手助或单纯腹腔镜经腹肾输尿管切除术的手术结果预测因素分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 1;9:934355. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.934355. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.比较手辅助、腹腔镜和机器人肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局和手术并发症。
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 4;11:731460. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of robot-assisted versus hand-assisted nephroureterectomy on circulating tumor cells for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.机器人辅助与手辅助肾输尿管切除术对上尿路上皮癌循环肿瘤细胞的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99092-4.
6
Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.开放性肾输尿管切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 13;8:729686. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686. eCollection 2021.
7
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:更新的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr 21;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02236-z.
8
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e11954. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011954.
9
Who needs further evaluations to diagnose upper urinary tract urothelial cancers among patients with abnormal findings by enhanced CT?对于增强CT检查有异常发现的患者,哪些患者需要进一步评估以诊断上尿路尿路上皮癌?
Asian J Urol. 2016 Jan;3(1):44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.开放性与腹腔镜下及机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术的系统评价
Rev Urol. 2017;19(1):32-43. doi: 10.3909/riu0691.
Surgical management for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.上尿路移行细胞癌的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13(4):CD007349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007349.pub2.
4
European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas: 2011 update.欧洲上尿路尿路上皮细胞癌诊断和治疗指南:2011 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):584-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.042. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
5
Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结果:国际队列研究结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):406-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09826.x. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
6
Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术在当代患者中的比较:复发和疾病特异性生存与手术技术相关吗?
Eur Urol. 2010 Nov;58(5):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
7
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy: perioperative and oncologic outcomes from a randomised prospective study.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术:一项随机前瞻性研究的围手术期和肿瘤学结果
Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
8
Laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: oncological outcomes and 5-year follow-up.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:肿瘤学结局及5年随访
BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9):1274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08594.x. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
9
Hand-assisted and total laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison.手辅助与全腹腔镜肾切除术:一项比较研究。
JSLS. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):36-43.
10
Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1249 cases.开放和腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结果比较:1249 例多机构分析。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jul;56(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.072. Epub 2009 Apr 3.