Lee Kyung Hwa, Siegle Greg J
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1147-57. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12254. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
This study examined the extent to which emotional face stimuli differ from the neural reactivity associated with more ecological contextually augmented stimuli. Participants were scanned when they viewed contextually rich pictures depicting both emotional faces and context, and pictures of emotional faces presented alone. Emotional faces alone were more strongly associated with brain activity in paralimbic and social information processing regions, whereas emotional faces augmented by context were associated with increased and sustained activity in regions potentially representing increased complexity and subjective emotional experience. Furthermore, context effects were modulated by emotional intensity and valence. These findings suggest that cortical elaboration that is apparent in contextually augmented stimuli may be missed in studies of emotional faces alone, whereas emotional faces may more selectively recruit limbic reactivity.
本研究考察了情绪面孔刺激与更具生态情境增强刺激所关联的神经反应性之间的差异程度。当参与者观看描绘情绪面孔和情境的情境丰富图片以及单独呈现的情绪面孔图片时,对他们进行了扫描。单独的情绪面孔与边缘旁和社会信息处理区域的大脑活动关联更强,而情境增强的情绪面孔与可能代表复杂性增加和主观情绪体验增强的区域中活动的增加和持续有关。此外,情境效应受情绪强度和效价的调节。这些发现表明,在单独的情绪面孔研究中可能会遗漏情境增强刺激中明显的皮层精细加工,而情绪面孔可能更有选择性地激发边缘系统反应。