Donkin Chris, Nosofsky Robert, Gold Jason, Shiffrin Richard
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Matthews Building, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia,
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):170-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0675-5.
Zhang and Luck (Psychological Science, 20, 423-428, 2009) found that perceptual memories are lost over time via sudden death rather than gradual decay. However, they acknowledged that participants may have instead lost memory for the locations of objects. We required observers to recall only a single object. Although the paradigm eliminated the need to maintain object-location bindings, the possibility that observers would use verbal labels increased. To measure the precision of verbal labeling, we included explicit verbal-labeling and label-matching trials. We applied a model that measured the contributions of sudden death, gradual decay, and verbal labeling to recall. Our model-based evidence pointed to sudden death as the primary vehicle by which perceptual memories were lost. Crucially, however, the sudden-death hypothesis was favored only when the verbal-labeling component was included as part of the modeling. The results underscore the importance of taking into account the potential role of verbal-labeling processes in investigations of perceptual memory.
张和勒克(《心理科学》,第20卷,第423 - 428页,2009年)发现,感知记忆会随着时间推移通过突然消失而非逐渐衰退的方式丧失。然而,他们承认参与者可能反而丧失了对物体位置的记忆。我们要求观察者只回忆一个物体。虽然该范式消除了维持物体 - 位置绑定的需求,但观察者使用言语标签的可能性增加了。为了测量言语标签的精确性,我们纳入了明确的言语标签和标签匹配试验。我们应用了一个模型来测量突然消失、逐渐衰退和言语标签对回忆的贡献。基于模型的证据表明突然消失是感知记忆丧失的主要方式。然而,至关重要的是,只有当言语标签成分被纳入建模时,突然消失假说才更受青睐。这些结果强调了在感知记忆研究中考虑言语标签过程潜在作用的重要性。