Siciliano Nicholas A, Hersperger Adam R, Lacuanan Aimee M, Xu Ren-Huan, Sidney John, Sette Alessandro, Sigal Luis J, Eisenlohr Laurence C
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Biology, Albright College, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Virol. 2014 Sep 1;88(17):10078-91. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01150-14. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
The factors that determine CD4+ T cell (TCD4+) specificities, functional capacity, and memory persistence in response to complex pathogens remain unclear. We explored these parameters in the C57BL/6 mouse through comparison of two highly related (>92% homology) poxviruses: ectromelia virus (ECTV), a natural mouse pathogen, and vaccinia virus (VACV), a heterologous virus that nevertheless elicits potent immune responses. In addition to elucidating several previously unidentified major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II)-restricted epitopes, we observed many qualitative and quantitative differences between the TCD4+ repertoires, including responses not elicited by VACV despite complete sequence conservation. In addition, we observed functional heterogeneity between ECTV- and VACV-specific TCD4+ at both a global and individual epitope level, particularly greater expression of the cytolytic marker CD107a from TCD4+ following ECTV infection. Most striking were differences during the late memory phase where, in contrast to ECTV, VACV infection failed to elicit measurable epitope-specific TCD4+ as determined by intracellular cytokine staining. These findings illustrate the strong influence of epitope-extrinsic factors on TCD4+ responses and memory.
Much of our understanding concerning host-pathogen relationships in the context of poxvirus infections stems from studies of VACV in mice. However, VACV is not a natural mouse pathogen, and therefore, the relevance of results obtained using this model may be limited. Here, we explored the MHC class II-restricted TCD4+ repertoire induced by mousepox (ECTV) infection and the functional profile of the responding epitope-specific TCD4+, comparing these results to those induced by VACV infection under matched conditions. Despite a high degree of homology between the two viruses, we observed distinct specificity and functional profiles of TCD4+ responses at both acute and memory time points, with VACV-specific TCD4+ memory being notably compromised. These data offer insight into the impact of epitope-extrinsic factors on the resulting TCD4+ responses.
在应对复杂病原体时,决定CD4 + T细胞(TCD4 +)特异性、功能能力和记忆持久性的因素仍不清楚。我们通过比较两种高度相关(> 92%同源性)的痘病毒,在C57BL / 6小鼠中探索了这些参数:埃可病毒(ECTV),一种天然的小鼠病原体,以及痘苗病毒(VACV),一种异源病毒,但其仍能引发强烈的免疫反应。除了阐明几个先前未鉴定的主要组织相容性复合体II类(MHC-II)限制表位外,我们还观察到TCD4 +库之间存在许多定性和定量差异,包括尽管序列完全保守但VACV未引发的反应。此外,我们在整体和个体表位水平上都观察到ECTV特异性和VACV特异性TCD4 +之间的功能异质性,特别是ECTV感染后TCD4 +中溶细胞标记物CD107a的表达更高。最显著的是在晚期记忆阶段的差异,与ECTV相反,通过细胞内细胞因子染色测定,VACV感染未能引发可测量的表位特异性TCD4 +。这些发现说明了表位外在因素对TCD4 +反应和记忆的强烈影响。
我们对痘病毒感染背景下宿主 - 病原体关系的许多理解源于对小鼠中VACV的研究。然而,VACV不是天然的小鼠病原体,因此,使用该模型获得的结果的相关性可能有限。在这里,我们探索了由鼠痘(ECTV)感染诱导的MHC II类限制的TCD4 +库以及反应性表位特异性TCD4 +的功能概况,并将这些结果与在匹配条件下VACV感染诱导的结果进行比较。尽管两种病毒之间具有高度同源性,但我们在急性和记忆时间点都观察到TCD4 +反应具有明显不同的特异性和功能概况,VACV特异性TCD4 +记忆明显受损。这些数据提供了对表位外在因素对所得TCD4 +反应影响的见解。