• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大助产服务的预计效果。

The projected effect of scaling up midwifery.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1146-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60790-X. Epub 2014 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60790-X
PMID:24965814
Abstract

We used the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate deaths averted if midwifery was scaled up in 78 countries classified into three tertiles using the Human Development Index (HDI). We selected interventions in LiST to encompass the scope of midwifery practice, including prepregnancy, antenatal, labour, birth, and post-partum care, and family planning. Modest (10%), substantial (25%), or universal (95%) scale-up scenarios from present baseline levels were all found to reduce maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths by 2025 in all countries tested. With universal coverage of midwifery interventions for maternal and newborn health, excluding family planning, for the countries with the lowest HDI, 61% of all maternal, fetal, and neonatal deaths could be prevented. Family planning alone could prevent 57% of all deaths because of reduced fertility and fewer pregnancies. Midwifery with both family planning and interventions for maternal and newborn health could avert a total of 83% of all maternal deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths. The inclusion of specialist care in the scenarios resulted in an increased number of deaths being prevented, meaning that midwifery care has the greatest effect when provided within a functional health system with effective referral and transfer mechanisms to specialist care.

摘要

我们使用 Lives Saved Tool(LiST)来估计如果在人类发展指数(HDI)分为三个三分位数的 78 个国家扩大助产服务规模可以避免的死亡人数。我们在 LiST 中选择了干预措施,以涵盖助产实践的范围,包括孕前、产前、分娩、产后和计划生育护理。在所有接受测试的国家中,即使从目前的基线水平适度(10%)、大量(25%)或普遍(95%)扩大规模,都可以在 2025 年前减少孕产妇死亡、死产和新生儿死亡。在所有 HDI 最低的国家,普及助产服务干预措施,包括孕产妇和新生儿健康,但不包括计划生育,可以预防所有孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿死亡的 61%。仅计划生育就可以预防所有死亡的 57%,因为生育率降低和妊娠减少。将计划生育和孕产妇及新生儿健康干预措施相结合,总共可以避免所有孕产妇死亡、死产和新生儿死亡的 83%。在这些情景中纳入专科护理,意味着可以预防更多的死亡人数,这意味着在具有有效转诊和转介机制的功能型卫生系统中提供助产服务可以产生最大的效果。

相似文献

1
The projected effect of scaling up midwifery.扩大助产服务的预计效果。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1146-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60790-X. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
2
Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study.助产士在预防和减少孕产妇和新生儿死亡及死产方面的潜在影响:一项挽救生命工具建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e24-e32. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30397-1. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
The impact and cost of scaling up midwifery and obstetrics in 58 low- and middle-income countries.58个低收入和中等收入国家扩大助产和产科服务的影响及成本
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e98550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098550. eCollection 2014.
4
Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver?降低产时相关死亡和残疾:卫生系统能否做到?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S123-40, S140-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.021.
5
An analysis of three levels of scaled-up coverage for 28 interventions to avert stillbirths and maternal, newborn and child mortality in 27 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean with the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).运用挽救生命工具(LiST)对拉丁美洲和加勒比地区27个国家的28项预防死产及孕产妇、新生儿和儿童死亡干预措施的三个扩大覆盖水平进行分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3238-z.
6
Patterns in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: projections of neonatal and under-5 mortality to 2035.孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施覆盖情况的模式:到 2035 年对新生儿和 5 岁以下儿童死亡率的预测。
Lancet. 2013 Sep 21;382(9897):1029-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61748-1.
7
Expanding the population coverage of evidence-based interventions with community health workers to save the lives of mothers and children: an analysis of potential global impact using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST).扩大社区卫生工作者基于证据的干预措施的人群覆盖范围以拯救母婴生命:使用挽救生命工具(LiST)对潜在全球影响的分析
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020401. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020401.
8
Prospective community-based cluster census and case-control study of stillbirths and neonatal deaths in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.约旦河西岸和加沙地带死产和新生儿死亡的前瞻性社区整群普查及病例对照研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;22(4):321-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00943.x.
9
Triple return on investment: the cost and impact of 13 interventions that could prevent stillbirths and save the lives of mothers and babies in South Africa.投资回报率提高三倍:13项干预措施在南非预防死产以及挽救母婴生命方面的成本与影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 18;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0456-9.
10
Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery.通过助产士改善母婴健康。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1226-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2. Epub 2014 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
"What You Leave…Will Leave You": A Qualitative Study of Perceptions of Midwifery's Intangible Heritage and Professional Identity Among Midwives and Student Midwives in Cyprus.“你所留下的……将离你而去”:塞浦路斯助产士和助产专业学生对助产无形遗产和职业身份认知的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;13(15):1936. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151936.
2
Evaluating predelivery platelet and coagulation indices as predictors of immediate postpartum haemorrhage in low-risk women undergoing vaginal delivery.评估分娩前血小板和凝血指标,以预测低风险阴道分娩女性产后即刻出血情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07427-0.
3
Men as Midwifery Professionals: A Scoping Review.
男性作为助产专业人员:一项范围综述。
Birth. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1111/birt.12894.
4
Mathematical modelling to estimate the impact of maternal and perinatal healthcare services and interventions on health in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.评估撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕产妇和围产期保健服务及干预措施对健康影响的数学模型构建:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0296540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296540. eCollection 2024.
5
Implementation of competency-based education for quality midwifery programmes in Africa: a scoping review.非洲基于能力的优质助产士课程教育的实施:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02333-w.
6
Midwives: Essential guardians in the climate crisis journey.助产士:气候危机之旅中的重要守护者。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 May 22;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/188196. eCollection 2024.
7
Job satisfaction among midwives in low and middle-income countries: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家助产士的工作满意度:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
SAGE Open Med. 2024 May 6;12:20503121241247993. doi: 10.1177/20503121241247993. eCollection 2024.
8
Barriers to clinical learning skills development among midwifery students and newly qualified midwives in Morocco: A qualitative study.摩洛哥助产专业学生和新晋合格助产士临床学习技能发展的障碍:一项定性研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Apr 28;10(2):160-168. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3163. eCollection 2024.
9
A regulatory gap analysis of midwifery to deliver essential reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health services in Lao People's Democratic Republic.老挝人民民主共和国提供基本生殖、孕产妇、新生儿、儿童和青少年卫生服务的助产工作监管差距分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Dec 5;43:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100960. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Quality midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A focus group study with midwives, nurses, and midwifery educators.孟加拉国新冠疫情期间的优质助产护理:一项针对助产士、护士和助产教育工作者的焦点小组研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2023 Dec 15;7:41. doi: 10.18332/ejm/174234. eCollection 2023.