Bartlett Linda, Weissman Eva, Gubin Rehana, Patton-Molitors Rachel, Friberg Ingrid K
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America; Maternal Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Futures Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e98550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098550. eCollection 2014.
To guide achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, we used the Lives Saved Tool to provide a novel simulation of potential maternal, fetal, and newborn lives and costs saved by scaling up midwifery and obstetrics services, including family planning, in 58 low- and middle-income countries. Typical midwifery and obstetrics interventions were scaled to either 60% of the national population (modest coverage) or 99% (universal coverage).
Under even a modest scale-up, midwifery services including family planning reduce maternal, fetal, and neonatal deaths by 34%. Increasing midwifery alone or integrated with obstetrics is more cost-effective than scaling up obstetrics alone; when family planning was included, the midwifery model was almost twice as cost-effective as the obstetrics model, at $2,200 versus $4,200 per death averted. The most effective strategy was the most comprehensive: increasing midwives, obstetricians, and family planning could prevent 69% of total deaths under universal scale-up, yielding a cost per death prevented of just $2,100. Within this analysis, the interventions which midwifery and obstetrics are poised to deliver most effectively are different, with midwifery benefits delivered across the continuum of pre-pregnancy, prenatal, labor and delivery, and postpartum-postnatal care, and obstetrics benefits focused mostly on delivery. Including family planning within each scope of practice reduced the number of likely births, and thus deaths, and increased the cost-effectiveness of the entire package (e.g., a 52% reduction in deaths with midwifery and obstetrics increased to 69% when family planning was added; cost decreased from $4,000 to $2,100 per death averted).
This analysis suggests that scaling up midwifery and obstetrics could bring many countries closer to achieving mortality reductions. Midwives alone can achieve remarkable mortality reductions, particularly when they also perform family planning services--the greatest return on investment occurs with the scale-up of midwives and obstetricians together.
为指导千年发展目标的实现,我们使用了“挽救生命工具”,对58个低收入和中等收入国家扩大助产和产科服务(包括计划生育)可挽救的孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿生命以及节省的成本进行了全新模拟。典型的助产和产科干预措施扩大到全国人口的60%(适度覆盖)或99%(全面覆盖)。
即使在适度扩大规模的情况下,包括计划生育在内的助产服务也能使孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿死亡人数减少34%。单独扩大助产服务或与产科服务相结合,比单独扩大产科服务更具成本效益;当纳入计划生育时,助产模式的成本效益几乎是产科模式的两倍,每避免一例死亡的成本分别为2200美元和4200美元。最有效的策略是最全面的策略:在全面扩大规模的情况下,增加助产士、产科医生和计划生育服务可预防69%的总死亡人数,每避免一例死亡的成本仅为2100美元。在该分析中,助产和产科有望最有效提供的干预措施有所不同,助产服务的益处贯穿孕前、产前、分娩和产后护理的全过程,而产科服务的益处主要集中在分娩方面。在每个业务范围内纳入计划生育减少了可能的出生数量,从而减少了死亡人数,并提高了整个套餐的成本效益(例如,助产和产科服务使死亡人数减少52%,加入计划生育后增加到69%;每避免一例死亡的成本从4000美元降至2100美元)。
该分析表明,扩大助产和产科服务可使许多国家更接近实现死亡率降低的目标。仅助产士就能显著降低死亡率,特别是当他们也提供计划生育服务时——扩大助产士和产科医生的规模可带来最大的投资回报。