• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项包含25个条目的痛苦筛查工具的鉴别力:对251名癌症幸存者的横断面调查

Discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool: a cross-sectional survey of 251 cancer survivors.

作者信息

Miller Melissa F, Mullins C Daniel, Onukwugha Eberechukwu, Golant Mitch, Buzaglo Joanne S

机构信息

Cancer Support Community (CSC) Research and Training Institute, 4100 Chamounix Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA,

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2855-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0742-4. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-014-0742-4
PMID:24966017
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to test the discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool for use among cancer survivors. We used a measure of item discrimination to determine which items perform better than others at identifying those at greatest risk of distress.

METHODS

A total of 251 members (90 % female, median age 57 years) of a community-based cancer support organization completed a web-based distress screening tool. Participants were asked to rate each of 25 items according to the question "Today, how concerned are you about…?" using a five-point Likert scale (0 not at all to 4 very seriously concerned). An overall distress score was calculated as the sum of items rated at or above two for somewhat concerned. Participants were categorized as high scorers (≥13, n = 59) and low scorers (≤4, n = 60). The item discrimination index (IDI) was calculated for each item as the percentage difference in concerned (somewhat or greater) responses between high and low scorers.

RESULTS

Items with the greatest discriminatory power (IDI ≥0.8) were as follows: changes or disruptions in work, school or home life; feeling sad or depressed; feeling too tired to do the things you need or want to do; worrying about the future and what lies ahead; and feeling nervous or afraid. Conversely, items with the lowest IDI included considering taking your own life; eating and nutrition; tobacco or substance use; and transportation to treatment and appointments.

CONCLUSION

The results highlight, among 25 items of a community-based distress screening tool, items with the greatest discriminatory power to identify cancer survivors with psychosocial distress. Results suggest targeted screening items to identify those most at risk for distress and priority areas for support services.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试一种包含25个条目的困扰筛查工具在癌症幸存者中的鉴别能力。我们采用条目鉴别度测量方法来确定哪些条目在识别困扰风险最高的人群方面比其他条目表现更好。

方法

一个社区癌症支持组织的251名成员(90%为女性,年龄中位数为57岁)完成了一项基于网络的困扰筛查工具。参与者被要求根据“今天,你对……有多担心?”这个问题,使用五点李克特量表(0表示一点也不担心,4表示非常担心)对25个条目中的每一个进行评分。总体困扰得分计算为评分在“有些担心”(即2分及以上)的条目的总和。参与者被分为高分者(≥13分,n = 59)和低分者(≤4分,n = 60)。每个条目的条目鉴别指数(IDI)计算为高分者和低分者在“有些担心”或更担心的回答上的百分比差异。

结果

鉴别能力最强(IDI≥0.8)的条目如下:工作、学校或家庭生活的变化或干扰;感到悲伤或沮丧;感到太累而无法做自己需要或想做的事情;担心未来和即将发生的事情;以及感到紧张或害怕。相反,IDI最低的条目包括考虑自杀;饮食和营养;烟草或物质使用;以及前往治疗和预约的交通。

结论

结果突出了在一个基于社区的困扰筛查工具的25个条目中,鉴别心理社会困扰的癌症幸存者能力最强的条目。结果表明了用于识别困扰风险最高人群的针对性筛查条目以及支持服务的优先领域。

相似文献

1
Discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool: a cross-sectional survey of 251 cancer survivors.一项包含25个条目的痛苦筛查工具的鉴别力:对251名癌症幸存者的横断面调查
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2855-63. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0742-4. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
2
A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children.一种针对中国儿童的改良版自闭症筛查工具(幼儿自闭症筛查清单[CHAT-23])。
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):e166-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.e166.
3
CancerSupportSource®-15+: development and evaluation of a short form of a distress screening program for cancer patients and survivors.癌症支持资源®-15+:一种用于癌症患者和幸存者的困扰筛查程序的简短形式的开发和评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Aug;29(8):4413-4421. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-05988-2. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
Screening for distress in pediatric cancer survivors: A systematic comparison of one-step and two-step strategies to minimize detection errors.儿童癌症幸存者的痛苦筛查:最小化检测错误的一步法和两步法策略的系统比较。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(4):441-456. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1906377. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
How does the Distress Thermometer compare to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among cancer survivors? distress thermometer 与医院焦虑抑郁量表相比,在检测癌症幸存者中可能存在的心理疾病方面有何不同?
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jan;21(1):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1499-3. Epub 2012 May 24.
6
Psychological distress in cancer survivors: the further development of an item bank.癌症幸存者的心理困扰:一个项目库的进一步发展。
Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):308-14. doi: 10.1002/pon.2090. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
7
Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the Kessler 10-item questionnaire (K10) for measuring psychological distress in rural Bangladesh.对 Kessler 10 项量表(K10)中文版在孟加拉国农村地区进行心理困扰测量的访谈式版本的心理计量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e022967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022967.
8
Can the distress thermometer (DT) identify significant psychological distress in long-term cancer survivors? A comparison with the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). distress thermometer (DT) 能否识别长期癌症幸存者的显著心理困扰?与 Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) 的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan;20(1):195-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1269-7. Epub 2011 Sep 18.
9
Demonstrating the psychometric properties of a problem-related distress screener in a community sample of 319 cancer survivors.在一个由 319 名癌症幸存者组成的社区样本中,展示一种与问题相关的困扰筛查器的心理计量特性。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1249-57. doi: 10.1002/pon.3124. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Validation of Malaysian translated distress thermometer with problem checklist among the breast cancer survivors in Malaysia.马来西亚乳腺癌幸存者中使用问题清单的马来西亚语翻译版苦恼温度计的验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2012 Mar;5(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the SCNS-TARGET: a new tool to assess unmet needs in cancer patients utilising immuno-, biological or precision therapies.SCNS-TARGET的开发:一种利用免疫、生物或精准疗法评估癌症患者未满足需求的新工具。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01787-4.
2
A randomized controlled trial of a distress screening, consultation, and targeted referral system for family caregivers in oncologic care.一项针对肿瘤护理中家庭照顾者的痛苦筛查、咨询及定向转诊系统的随机对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2024 Feb;33(2):e6301. doi: 10.1002/pon.6301.
3
Assessing unmet needs in advanced cancer patients: a systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available instruments.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.心理肿瘤干预对成年癌症患者情绪困扰和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):782-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8922. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage.在线筛查新诊断肿瘤门诊患者的困扰(第六大生命体征):计算机化与个体化分诊的随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 7;107(4):617-25. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.309. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
3
评估晚期癌症患者的未满足需求:现有工具的开发、内容和质量的系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Oct;16(5):960-975. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01088-6. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Using a Quality Improvement Model to Implement Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Setting.在社区癌症环境中使用质量改进模型实施痛苦筛查。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Nov-Dec;11(8):825-834. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.8.3. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
5
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of Coping with Cancer in the Kitchen, a Nutrition Education Program for Cancer Survivors.一项随机对照试验测试了“在厨房应对癌症”(一种针对癌症幸存者的营养教育计划)的有效性。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):3144. doi: 10.3390/nu12103144.
6
Feasibility and Acceptability of Distress Screening for Family Caregivers at a Cancer Surgery Center.癌症手术中心对家庭照顾者进行痛苦筛查的可行性与可接受性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):159-169. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.159-169.
7
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a significant impact on patients' overall health and productivity: the MPN Landmark survey.骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPNs)对患者的整体健康和生产力有重大影响:MPN标志性调查。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 27;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2208-2.
Demonstrating the psychometric properties of a problem-related distress screener in a community sample of 319 cancer survivors.
在一个由 319 名癌症幸存者组成的社区样本中,展示一种与问题相关的困扰筛查器的心理计量特性。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1249-57. doi: 10.1002/pon.3124. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
4
Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations.癌症患者的痛苦和未满足需求筛查:综述与建议。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1160-77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5509. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
5
What happens now? Psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion.治疗完成后癌症幸存者的心理社会关怀:接下来会发生什么?
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7406. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
Caring for the whole patient: the science of psychosocial care.关爱患者整体:心理社会护理科学
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1151-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.4078. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
7
Does screening for distress efficiently uncover meetable unmet needs in cancer patients?在癌症患者中,进行痛苦筛查能有效地发现可满足的未满足需求吗?
Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):655-63. doi: 10.1002/pon.1939. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
8
An examination of distress, sleep, and fatigue in metastatic breast cancer patients.转移性乳腺癌患者的痛苦、睡眠和疲劳评估。
Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):100-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.1873. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
9
Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.肺癌和乳腺癌门诊患者的痛苦筛查:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 20;28(33):4884-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3698. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
10
Validation of the modified Fresno test: assessing physical therapists' evidence based practice knowledge and skills.修改后的弗雷诺测试的验证:评估物理治疗师的循证实践知识和技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 May 25;10:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-38.