Director Infant Perception-Action Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA.
Department of Psychology, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 11;5:576. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00576. eCollection 2014.
For decades, the emergence and progression of infant reaching was assumed to be largely under the control of vision. More recently, however, the guiding role of vision in the emergence of reaching has been downplayed. Studies found that young infants can reach in the dark without seeing their hand and that corrections in infants' initial hand trajectories are not the result of visual guidance of the hand, but rather the product of poor movement speed calibration to the goal. As a result, it has been proposed that learning to reach is an embodied process requiring infants to explore proprioceptively different movement solutions, before they can accurately map their actions onto the intended goal. Such an account, however, could still assume a preponderant (or prospective) role of vision, where the movement is being monitored with the scope of approximating a future goal-location defined visually. At reach onset, it is unknown if infants map their action onto their vision, vision onto their action, or both. To examine how infants learn to map the feel of their hand with the sight of the object, we tracked the object-directed looking behavior (via eye-tracking) of three infants followed weekly over an 11-week period throughout the transition to reaching. We also examined where they contacted the object. We find that with some objects, infants do not learn to align their reach to where they look, but rather learn to align their look to where they reach. We propose that the emergence of reaching is the product of a deeply embodied process, in which infants first learn how to direct their movement in space using proprioceptive and haptic feedback from self-produced movement contingencies with the environment. As they do so, they learn to map visual attention onto these bodily centered experiences, not the reverse. We suggest that this early visuo-motor mapping is critical for the formation of visually-elicited, prospective movement control.
几十年来,婴儿伸手动作的出现和发展被认为主要受视觉控制。然而,最近,视觉在伸手出现过程中的引导作用已被淡化。研究发现,年幼的婴儿在看不见手的情况下也能伸手,并且婴儿最初的手部轨迹的纠正不是手部视觉引导的结果,而是手部运动速度对目标校准不良的结果。因此,有人提出,学习伸手是一个体现过程,需要婴儿通过探索本体感觉来找到不同的运动解决方案,然后才能将他们的动作准确地映射到目标上。然而,这种解释仍然可能假设视觉具有主导(或预期)作用,在这种作用下,运动被监测,目的是近似视觉定义的未来目标位置。在伸手开始时,尚不清楚婴儿是将动作映射到视觉上,还是将视觉映射到动作上,或者两者兼而有之。为了研究婴儿如何学会将手的感觉与物体的视觉相匹配,我们通过眼动追踪跟踪了三个婴儿的物体指向性注视行为,并在 11 周的时间内每周进行一次跟踪,以观察他们在向伸手过渡期间的行为。我们还观察了他们接触物体的位置。我们发现,对于某些物体,婴儿并没有学会将伸手与他们的注视相匹配,而是学会将他们的注视与他们的伸手相匹配。我们提出,伸手的出现是一个深度体现过程的产物,在这个过程中,婴儿首先学会如何使用来自自身与环境相互作用的运动变化的本体感觉和触觉反馈来在空间中引导他们的运动。随着他们的学习,他们学会将视觉注意力映射到这些身体中心的体验上,而不是相反。我们认为,这种早期的视动映射对于形成视觉诱发的、前瞻性的运动控制至关重要。