• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Burch-Schneider防髋臼突出笼和大块同种异体骨移植进行髋臼重建:至少10年的随访结果。

Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

作者信息

Regis Dario, Sandri Andrea, Bonetti Ingrid

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Integrated University Hospital, Piazzale A Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:194076. doi: 10.1155/2014/194076. Epub 2014 May 21.

DOI:10.1155/2014/194076
PMID:24967339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4055303/
Abstract

Reconstruction of severe pelvic bone loss is a challenging problem in hip revision surgery. Between January 1992 and December 2000, 97 hips with periprosthetic osteolysis underwent acetabular revision using bulk allografts and the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage (APC). Twenty-nine patients (32 implants) died for unrelated causes without additional surgery. Sixty-five hips were available for clinical and radiographic assessment at an average follow-up of 14.6 years (range, 10.0 to 18.9 years). There were 16 male and 49 female patients, aged from 29 to 83 (median, 60 years), with Paprosky IIIA (27 cases) and IIIB (38 cases) acetabular bone defects. Nine cages required rerevision because of infection (3), aseptic loosening (5), and flange breakage (1). The average Harris hip score improved from 33.1 points preoperatively to 75.6 points at follow-up (P < 0.001). Radiographically, graft incorporation and cage stability were detected in 48 and 52 hips, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 18.9 years with removal for any reason or X-ray migration of the cage and aseptic or radiographic loosening as the end points were 80.0% and 84.6%, respectively. The use of the Burch-Schneider APC and massive allografts is an effective technique for the reconstructive treatment of extensive acetabular bone loss with long-lasting survival.

摘要

严重骨盆骨量丢失的重建是髋关节翻修手术中一个具有挑战性的问题。1992年1月至2000年12月期间,97例伴有假体周围骨溶解的髋关节接受了大块同种异体骨移植和Burch-Schneider抗内突笼(APC)的髋臼翻修术。29例患者(32个植入物)因无关原因死亡,未进行额外手术。65例髋关节可进行临床和影像学评估,平均随访14.6年(范围为10.0至18.9年)。有16例男性和49例女性患者,年龄从29岁至83岁(中位数为60岁),存在Paprosky IIIA(27例)和IIIB(38例)型髋臼骨缺损。9个笼子因感染(3个)、无菌性松动(5个)和翼缘断裂(1个)需要再次翻修。Harris髋关节平均评分从术前的33.1分提高到随访时的75.6分(P < 0.001)。影像学检查发现,分别有48例和52例髋关节出现移植物融合和笼子稳定。以任何原因取出或笼子X线移位以及无菌性或影像学松动为终点,18.9年时的累积生存率分别为80.0%和84.6%。使用Burch-Schneider APC和大块同种异体骨是重建治疗广泛髋臼骨丢失并获得长期生存的有效技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/4055303/238c75f475fa/BMRI2014-194076.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/4055303/173f585e90fd/BMRI2014-194076.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/4055303/238c75f475fa/BMRI2014-194076.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/4055303/173f585e90fd/BMRI2014-194076.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcf/4055303/238c75f475fa/BMRI2014-194076.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.使用Burch-Schneider防髋臼突出笼和大块同种异体骨移植进行髋臼重建:至少10年的随访结果。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:194076. doi: 10.1155/2014/194076. Epub 2014 May 21.
2
Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.Burch-Schneider笼及结构性同种异体骨移植在复杂髋臼缺损中的应用:3至10年随访
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Oct;31(10):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.Burch-Schneider cage 和大块同种异体移植物用于修复骨盆不连续的最少 10 年随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1057-63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
4
Long-term results of anti-protrusion cage and massive allografts for the management of periprosthetic acetabular bone loss.抗前凸笼和大块同种异体骨移植治疗人工关节周围髋臼骨缺损的长期疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6):826-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.06.017. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
5
The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中重建性骨笼和颗粒同种异体移植物联合应用治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼骨缺损的中远期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2915-3.
6
Acetabular reinforcement rings and bone allografts in the reconstructive treatment of periprosthetic bone loss.
Chir Organi Mov. 2002 Oct-Dec;87(4):217-24.
7
Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.杯笼重建治疗严重髋臼骨缺损和骨盆不连续:35 例连续病例的中期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1442-1448. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0481.R1.
8
[Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].[使用Burch-Schneider笼重建严重髋臼骨缺损]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Jun;73(3):157-63.
9
Survival Analysis of Allografting and Antiprotrusio Cage in Treating Massive Acetabular Bone Defects.同种异体移植与防旋假体治疗巨大髋臼骨缺损的生存分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):682-687. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.用于治疗髋臼缺损的现代伯奇-施奈德防内突笼:它仍然是一种选择吗?一项系统评价。
Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):705-715. doi: 10.1177/11207000221099817. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of structural bone allograft in revision hip arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis.结构性同种异体骨在翻修髋关节置换术中治疗髋臼巨大骨缺损的应用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 3;12(2):e70241. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70241. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with a Metal Augment: A Minimum Eight-Year Follow-Up Study.髋臼加强环结合金属补片的全髋关节翻修术:一项至少 8 年的随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 27;59(6):1036. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061036.
3
Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review.髋臼翻修术后松动:小梁金属与加强环的比较。一项系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.035. Epub 2013 May 27.
2
A minimum of 10-year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity.Burch-Schneider cage 和大块同种异体移植物用于修复骨盆不连续的最少 10 年随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jun;27(6):1057-63.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.
翻修全髋关节置换术中使用同种异体移植物的不同重建选择治疗严重髋臼骨缺损的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6403-6422. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects.翻修髋关节置换术中应用打压植骨髋臼杯重建治疗髋臼骨缺损的中期结果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):13322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z.
5
Acetabular fractures treatment needs in the elderly and nonagenarians.老年人及九旬老人髋臼骨折的治疗需求
EFORT Open Rev. 2022 May 31;7(6):433-445. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0019.
6
ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION IN PAPROSKY TYPE III DEFECTS.帕罗斯基III型缺损的髋臼重建
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Jan-Feb;27(1):59-63. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192701187313.
7
Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.髋臼补片强化环联合同种异体骨治疗严重髋臼骨缺损
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):561-571. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4142-1. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.严重髋臼骨缺损情况下失败髋臼假体的翻修:一项系统评价
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0539-7. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
9
Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.小梁金属系统和抗后凸笼在严重髋臼缺损翻修手术中的临床和影像学结果:一项对比研究
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1811-1818. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3801-6. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge.对19例接受小梁金属楔形物髋臼翻修的Paprosky 3A和3B型患者进行影像学评估。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Dec 6;53(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb.
伯奇-施奈德笼:帕普罗斯基3型髋臼缺损的9年生存率。临床及影像学随访
Hip Int. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):28-34. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9078.
4
Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty.髋关节翻修术中髋臼骨缺损的处理。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 5;93(19):1842-52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01197.
5
Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.Burch-Schneider髋臼笼晚期骨折:聚乙烯髋臼杯磨损后的罕见情况。
BMJ Case Rep. 2009;2009. doi: 10.1136/bcr.08.2008.0604. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
6
Load dispersion effects of acetabular reinforcement devices used in revision total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study using finite element analysis.髋臼加强装置在翻修全髋关节置换术中的载荷分散效应:有限元分析的模拟研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Oct;26(7):1061-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
7
Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?骨水泥固定 cage 是否能改善严重髋臼缺陷的翻修 THA 效果?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):494-502. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1546-7.
8
A late vascular complication due to component migration after revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术后因部件迁移导致的晚期血管并发症。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):976.e7-976.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.06.012. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
9
Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study.用于髋臼翻修的Burch-Schneider防髋臼突出笼:一项5至13年的随访研究。
Hip Int. 2010;20 Suppl 7:S112-8. doi: 10.1177/11207000100200s719. Epub 2010 May 27.
10
[Comparison of different cup revision systems].[不同髋臼翻修系统的比较]
Orthopade. 2009 Aug;38(8):704-10. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1429-3.