• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修髋关节置换术中应用打压植骨髋臼杯重建治疗髋臼骨缺损的中期结果。

Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects.

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Campus Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.

Orthopaedic Department of the Heinrich-Braun-Hospital Zwickau, 08060, Zwickau, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):13322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z
PMID:35922465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9349309/
Abstract

Acetabular defects are a challenging condition for surgeons in revision THA. A crucial aim is an anatomical restoration of the centre of rotation (COR) through grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the cup survival after biological restoration of acetabular defects in THA and the effect of Paprosky classification, age, BMI, and number of previous operations on cup survival. Retrospectively patients with a cup exchange and an impaction of cortico-cancellous or bulk grafts between 2009 and 2012 were included with a follow up with a minimum of 5 year. Implant failure was defined as radiographic loosening or explantation of the cup. The acetabular defect situation was classified to Paprosky. 82 patients (58 female 70.7%) were included. 26 patients were not available to contact. 56 patients (40 female 71.4%) remained for survival analysis with mean age of 75.6 ± 8 years. Survival of the cup after 5 years was 90% and after 7.8 years 88%. There was no difference in survival concerning defect classification, type of implant or graft, age, BMI, and number of previous operations. Patients on the follow up reached an HHS of 67.4 ± 19, a WOMAC Score of 33.4 ± 25.4 points and an unsatisfactory result in the SF-36. Impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects is a good option with satisfactory biomechanical results and survival for small defects. Predictive factors for cup survival could not be clarified in our study. So, the correct indication, knowing the limits of the methods and the correct choice of implant allow a defect-oriented approach and are decisive for the success of the operation.

摘要

髋臼缺损是髋关节翻修术的一个挑战。一个关键的目标是通过移植物实现旋转中心 (COR) 的解剖复位。本研究旨在确定髋关节置换术中髋臼缺损生物修复后杯的存活率,以及 Paprosky 分类、年龄、BMI 和既往手术次数对杯存活率的影响。回顾性纳入 2009 年至 2012 年间接受杯置换术和皮质松质或块状移植物打压植骨的患者,随访时间至少 5 年。植体失败定义为影像学松动或杯体取出。髋臼缺损情况按 Paprosky 分类。共纳入 82 例患者(58 例女性,70.7%)。26 例患者无法联系。56 例患者(40 例女性,71.4%)进行生存分析,平均年龄 75.6±8 岁。5 年后杯的存活率为 90%,7.8 年后为 88%。缺损分类、植入物或移植物类型、年龄、BMI 和既往手术次数与生存率无差异。在随访时,患者的 HHS 为 67.4±19,WOMAC 评分为 33.4±25.4 分,SF-36 评分不满意。髋臼缺损打压植骨是一种较好的选择,具有良好的生物力学效果和小缺损的存活率。在本研究中,无法明确杯存活率的预测因素。因此,正确的适应证、了解方法的局限性和正确选择植入物可以进行针对缺损的治疗方法,对手术的成功至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/32693c763380/41598_2022_17526_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/56300a46c2d4/41598_2022_17526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/51da402ba65a/41598_2022_17526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/cdf3ad5e8ec0/41598_2022_17526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/41330fcc9b47/41598_2022_17526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/343213f04179/41598_2022_17526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/41a6bc59eecc/41598_2022_17526_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/649fffc6ed7c/41598_2022_17526_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/ab9fbe973980/41598_2022_17526_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/32693c763380/41598_2022_17526_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/56300a46c2d4/41598_2022_17526_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/51da402ba65a/41598_2022_17526_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/cdf3ad5e8ec0/41598_2022_17526_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/41330fcc9b47/41598_2022_17526_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/343213f04179/41598_2022_17526_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/41a6bc59eecc/41598_2022_17526_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/649fffc6ed7c/41598_2022_17526_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/ab9fbe973980/41598_2022_17526_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d40/9349309/32693c763380/41598_2022_17526_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects.翻修髋关节置换术中应用打压植骨髋臼杯重建治疗髋臼骨缺损的中期结果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 3;12(1):13322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17526-z.
2
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
3
The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中重建性骨笼和颗粒同种异体移植物联合应用治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼骨缺损的中远期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2915-3.
4
The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.增强型模块化笼重建系统治疗严重髋臼缺损:两年临床和影像学结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2269-2278. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4271-6. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].髋臼组件打压植骨治疗严重髋臼缺损的短期和中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.
6
Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects.使用加强网进行打压植骨治疗Paprosky 3B型髋臼缺损的早期良好结果
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):919-923. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
7
Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects.单纯双极金属臼杯翻修或结合打压植骨治疗复杂髋臼骨缺损的中期疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01828-x.
8
Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.采用模块化翻修系统及生物性缺损增强技术进行髋关节翻修术中髋臼缺损的重建。
Int Orthop. 2015 Apr;39(4):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5. Epub 2014 Oct 4.
9
[Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].[用于翻修全髋关节置换术的TC型椭圆形髋臼杯]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):506-11.
10
[Mid-Term to Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Oval-Shaped Acetabular Cup - TC Type].[使用椭圆形髋臼杯 - TC 型进行翻修全髋关节置换术的中期至长期结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(4):271-278.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-operative hip centre restoration and migration after impaction bone grafting in revision and complex primary hip arthroplasty.翻修和复杂初次髋关节置换术中打压植骨后髋关节中心的术后恢复及移位情况
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Oct;29(7):1411-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02458-8. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
2
Metallosis and elevated serum levels of tantalum following failed revision hip arthroplasty--a case report.髋关节翻修术失败后出现的金属沉着症及钽血清水平升高——病例报告
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):677-80. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.950816. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.
使用Burch-Schneider防髋臼突出笼和大块同种异体骨移植进行髋臼重建:至少10年的随访结果。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:194076. doi: 10.1155/2014/194076. Epub 2014 May 21.
4
Hip arthroplasty.髋关节置换术。
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60607-2. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
[Structural femoral head allografts in revision surgery of loosened acetabular cups].[髋臼杯松动翻修手术中的结构性股骨头同种异体骨移植]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Feb;110(2):104-10. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1195-1.
6
Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.髋臼翻修术中的穆勒加强环:164例髋关节随访2至17年的结果
Acta Orthop. 2006 Apr;77(2):234-41. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045966.
7
Basic science of bone impaction grafting.
Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:211-20.
8
Grafts and cages: managing massive bone loss.移植物与椎间融合器:应对大面积骨质流失
Orthopedics. 2000 Sep;23(9):973-4. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000901-27.
9
Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision. Histological evaluation in 8 patients.骨水泥型髋臼翻修术后植入骨块的融合。8例患者的组织学评估
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Dec;67(6):536-40. doi: 10.3109/17453679608997751.