Gorlin Eugenia I, Teachman Bethany A
a Department of Psychology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , VA , USA.
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(4):723-35. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.931275. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Prior findings are mixed regarding the presence and direction of threat-related interference biases in social anxiety. The current study examined general inhibitory control (IC), measured by the classic colour-word Stroop, as a moderator of the relationship between both threat interference biases [indexed by the emotional Stroop (e-Stroop)] and several social anxiety indicators. High socially anxious undergraduate students (N = 159) completed the emotional and colour-word Stroop tasks, followed by an anxiety-inducing speech task. Participants completed measures of trait social anxiety, state anxiety before and during the speech, negative task-interfering cognitions during the speech and overall self-evaluation of speech performance. Speech duration was used to measure behavioural avoidance. In line with hypotheses, IC moderated the relationship between e-Stroop bias and every anxiety indicator (with the exception of behavioural avoidance), such that greater social-threat interference was associated with higher anxiety among those with weak IC, whereas lesser social-threat interference was associated with higher anxiety among those with strong IC. Implications for the theory and treatment of threat interference biases in socially anxious individuals are discussed.
先前关于社交焦虑中与威胁相关的干扰偏差的存在和方向的研究结果不一。本研究通过经典的颜色-词语斯特鲁普测验来考察一般抑制控制(IC),将其作为威胁干扰偏差[以情绪斯特鲁普(e-斯特鲁普)为指标]与多个社交焦虑指标之间关系的调节变量。高社交焦虑的本科生(N = 159)完成了情绪和颜色-词语斯特鲁普任务,随后进行了诱发焦虑的演讲任务。参与者完成了特质社交焦虑、演讲前和演讲过程中的状态焦虑、演讲过程中负面的任务干扰认知以及演讲表现的总体自我评价的测量。演讲时长用于测量行为回避。与假设一致,IC调节了e-斯特鲁普偏差与每个焦虑指标之间的关系(行为回避除外),即对于抑制控制较弱的个体,更大的社会威胁干扰与更高的焦虑相关,而对于抑制控制较强的个体,较小的社会威胁干扰与更高的焦虑相关。本文讨论了对社交焦虑个体中威胁干扰偏差的理论和治疗的启示。