BMJ. 1989 Mar 11;298(6674):645-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6674.645.
To see whether omeprazole was superior to cimetidine in healing ulcers of the body of the stomach.
Double blind randomised parallel group study of omeprazole versus cimetidine for six weeks with assessment of healing at end of every second week.
Outpatient referrals in 11 centres in Denmark.
One hundred sixty one patients who satisfied the following criteria: age 18-79; one or more ulcers of body of stomach (that is, at or above the angulus) seen endoscopically within four days before study treatment; no H2 receptor antagonists taken within previous two weeks; no history of gastric surgery and no complications needing surgery; no concurrent treatment or disease that might confound assessment; oral contraception or an intrauterine device being used by women of childbearing age.
Omeprazole 30 mg daily (one capsule in the morning) or cimetidine 1 g daily (one 200 mg tablet thrice daily, two tablets at bedtime) for six weeks. Inactive capsules and tablets provided so that all patients took same number of capsules and tablets daily. Compliance monitored by pill counts.
Endoscopic evidence of accelerated healing of type I gastric ulcers after four weeks of omeprazole.
Pain recorded on diary cards and patients assessed after two, four, and six weeks of treatment for clinical state and by endoscopy and biopsy and repeat laboratory tests. Twenty eight patients withdrawn during trial for violations of protocol. At two weeks healing rates were identical in the two treatment groups (omeprazole 41% (30/73 patients); cimetidine 41% (30/73]. At four weeks cumulative healing rates were 77% (53/69 patients) in the omeprazole treatment group and 58% (41/71) in the cimetidine treatment group (95% confidence interval of difference between groups 4% to 34%). By six weeks the cumulative healing rates in the two treatment groups differed by only 6% (60/68 patients (88%) given omeprazole; 53/65 (82%) given cimetidine). Log rank analysis with ulcer size used as covariable showed a significant difference in healing times in favour of omeprazole. There was no difference in the occurrence of pain relief between the two treatment groups. No serious clinical or biochemical side effects of treatment were noted.
Omeprazole 30 mg daily accelerates healing of ulcers in the body of the stomach as compared with cimetidine 1 g daily. This effect is more pronounced in ulcers greater than 12 mm diameter.
观察奥美拉唑在治疗胃体溃疡方面是否优于西咪替丁。
奥美拉唑与西咪替丁的双盲随机平行组研究,为期六周,每两周结束时评估愈合情况。
丹麦11个中心的门诊转诊患者。
161名符合以下标准的患者:年龄18 - 79岁;在研究治疗前四天内通过内镜检查发现一处或多处胃体溃疡(即角切迹或其上方);在过去两周内未服用过H2受体拮抗剂;无胃手术史且无需要手术的并发症;无可能混淆评估的同时进行的治疗或疾病;育龄期女性正在使用口服避孕药或宫内节育器。
奥美拉唑每日30毫克(早晨服用一粒胶囊)或西咪替丁每日1克(每日三次,每次一片200毫克片剂,睡前两片),持续六周。提供无活性的胶囊和片剂,以便所有患者每天服用相同数量的胶囊和片剂。通过清点药丸监测依从性。
奥美拉唑治疗四周后I型胃溃疡加速愈合的内镜证据。
在日记卡上记录疼痛情况,并在治疗两周、四周和六周后对患者的临床状态、进行内镜检查及活检以及重复实验室检查进行评估。28名患者在试验期间因违反方案而退出。两周时,两个治疗组的愈合率相同(奥美拉唑组41%(73例患者中的30例);西咪替丁组41%(73例患者中的30例))。四周时,奥美拉唑治疗组的累积愈合率为77%(69例患者中的53例),西咪替丁治疗组为58%(71例患者中的41例)(两组差异的95%置信区间为4%至34%)。到六周时,两个治疗组的累积愈合率仅相差6%(接受奥美拉唑治疗的68例患者中的60例(88%);接受西咪替丁治疗的65例患者中的53例(82%))。以溃疡大小作为协变量的对数秩分析显示,愈合时间存在显著差异,支持奥美拉唑。两个治疗组在疼痛缓解的发生率上没有差异。未观察到治疗的严重临床或生化副作用。
与每日1克西咪替丁相比,每日30毫克奥美拉唑可加速胃体溃疡的愈合。这种效果在直径大于12毫米的溃疡中更为明显。