Bardhan K D, Naesdal J, Bianchi Porro G, Petrillo M, Lazzaroni M, Hinchliffe R F, Thompson M, Morris P, Daly M J, Carroll N J
District General Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Gut. 1991 Apr;32(4):435-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.4.435.
We tested the hypothesis that the gastric H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase inhibitor, omeprazole, because of its different mode of action and pronounced inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion, may be more effective in peptic ulcer that is refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonist treatment than continuing the same therapy. Altogether 107 patients (duodenal ulcer, n = 88; prepyloric ulcer, n = 14; gastric ulcer, n = 3; mixed sites, n = 2) with refractory peptic ulcer - that is ulcer unhealed after at least two months' treatment with cimetidine 0.8 g or 1 g daily or with ranitidine 0.3 g daily - were randomly allocated to receive either omeprazole 40 mg daily (n = 54) or to continue treatment with the same H2 receptor antagonist and at the same dose (n = 53) for up to eight weeks. The patients in the two treatment groups were well matched demographically. Healing by 'intent to treat' analysis was as follows: at four weeks, omeprazole 46 of 54 (85%), H2 receptor antagonist 18 of 53 (34%) (p less than 0.0001); and at eight weeks, 52 of 54 (96%) and 30 of 53 (57%) respectively (p less than 0.0001). One patient was lost to follow up but of the 22 patients whose ulcers were shown to be unhealed at endoscopy after receiving continued H2 receptor antagonist treatment, 21 healed in four to eight weeks when changed to omeprazole. Daytime epigastric pain cleared at four weeks in 43 of 47 (91%) patients on omeprazole and in 32 of 46 (70%) on H2 receptor antagonists (p=0.01) and relief of all dyspeptic symptoms occurred in 39 of 47 (83%) and 23 of 45 (51%) (p=0.0009) patients respectively. Adverse events occurred in 11 of 54 (20%) patients on omeprazole and in 12 of 35 (34%) on cimetidine but in none on ranitidine. The events were mild and none required treatment withdrawal. The commonest event in patients on omeprazole was loose stools or diarrhoea (n=5). Omeprazole was significantly better than continued H2 receptor antagonist treatment for the short term management of refractory peptic ulcer as judged by healing rate and pain relief, and it was safe.
胃H⁺/K⁺腺苷三磷酸酶抑制剂奥美拉唑,由于其不同的作用方式以及对胃酸分泌有显著抑制作用,对于组胺H₂受体拮抗剂治疗无效的消化性溃疡,可能比继续使用相同疗法更有效。共有107例难治性消化性溃疡患者(十二指肠溃疡88例、幽门管溃疡14例、胃溃疡3例、混合部位溃疡2例)——即每日服用西咪替丁0.8 g或1 g或雷尼替丁0.3 g治疗至少两个月后溃疡仍未愈合的患者——被随机分配,分别接受每日40 mg奥美拉唑治疗(54例)或继续使用相同剂量的H₂受体拮抗剂治疗(53例),疗程最长8周。两个治疗组的患者在人口统计学特征上匹配良好。按“意向性治疗”分析的愈合情况如下:4周时,奥美拉唑组54例中有46例(85%)愈合,H₂受体拮抗剂组53例中有18例(34%)愈合(p<0.0001);8周时,分别为54例中的52例(96%)和53例中的30例(57%)愈合(p<0.0001)。有1例患者失访,但在继续接受H₂受体拮抗剂治疗后经内镜检查显示溃疡未愈合的22例患者中,21例在换用奥美拉唑治疗4至8周后愈合。服用奥美拉唑的47例患者中43例(91%)在4周时上腹部日间疼痛消失,服用H₂受体拮抗剂的46例患者中32例(70%)疼痛消失(p=0.01),所有消化不良症状缓解的患者分别为47例中的39例(83%)和45例中的23例(51%)(p=0.0009)。服用奥美拉唑的54例患者中有11例(20%)出现不良事件,服用西咪替丁的35例患者中有12例(34%)出现不良事件,但服用雷尼替丁的患者未出现不良事件。这些事件均较轻微,无一例需要停药。服用奥美拉唑的患者中最常见的事件是大便稀溏或腹泻(5例)。从愈合率和疼痛缓解情况判断,奥美拉唑在难治性消化性溃疡的短期治疗中明显优于继续使用H₂受体拮抗剂治疗,且安全性良好。