de Looze Margaretha, Ter Bogt Tom F M, Raaijmakers Quinten A W, Pickett William, Kuntsche Emmanuel, Vollebergh Wilma A M
1 Department of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
1 Department of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25(1):50-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku083. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
According to Jessor's Problem Behaviour Theory (PBT) and Moffitt's theory of adolescence-limited antisocial behaviour, adolescent risk behaviours cluster and can be predicted by various psychosocial factors including parent, peer and school attachment. This study tested the potential influence of the sociocultural, or macro-level, environment on the clustering and correlates of adolescent risk behaviour across 27 European and North American countries.
Analyses were based on data from the 2009-10 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Participants compromised 56,090 adolescents (M(age) = 15.5 years) who self-reported on substance use (tobacco, alcohol, cannabis) and early sexual activity as well as on psychosocial factors (parent, peer and school attachment).
Multiple group confirmatory factor analyses (with country as grouping variable) showed that substance use and early sexual activity loaded on a single underlying factor across countries. In addition, multiple group path analyses (with country as grouping variable) showed that associations between this factor and parent, peer and school attachment were identical across countries.
Cross-national consistencies exist in the clustering and psychosocial correlates of substance use and early sexual activity across western countries. While Jessor's PBT stresses the problematic aspects of adolescent risk behaviours, Moffitt emphasizes their normative character. Although the problematic nature of risk behaviours overall receives more attention in the literature, it is important to consider both perspectives to fully understand why they cluster and correlate with psychosocial factors. This is essential for the development and implementation of prevention programmes aimed at reducing adolescent risk behaviours across Europe and North America.
根据杰索尔的问题行为理论(PBT)和莫菲特的青春期有限反社会行为理论,青少年风险行为相互关联,并且可以通过包括父母、同伴和学校依恋在内的各种社会心理因素进行预测。本研究测试了社会文化或宏观层面的环境对27个欧洲和北美国家青少年风险行为聚类及相关因素的潜在影响。
分析基于2009 - 2010年学龄儿童健康行为(HBSC)研究的数据。参与者包括56,090名青少年(平均年龄 = 15.5岁),他们自我报告了物质使用(烟草、酒精、大麻)、早期性行为以及社会心理因素(父母、同伴和学校依恋)。
多组验证性因素分析(以国家为分组变量)表明,物质使用和早期性行为在各国都加载于一个单一的潜在因素上。此外,多组路径分析(以国家为分组变量)表明,该因素与父母、同伴和学校依恋之间的关联在各国是相同的。
西方国家在物质使用和早期性行为的聚类以及社会心理相关因素方面存在跨国一致性。虽然杰索尔的PBT强调青少年风险行为的问题方面,但莫菲特强调其规范性。尽管风险行为的问题性质在文献中总体上受到更多关注,但为了全面理解它们为何聚类以及与社会心理因素相关,同时考虑这两种观点很重要。这对于制定和实施旨在减少欧洲和北美青少年风险行为的预防计划至关重要。