Haydn Johannes M, Hufnagel Anita, Grimm Johannes, Maurus Katja, Schartl Manfred, Meierjohann Svenja
Department of Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.
Department of Physiological Chemistry, Biocenter, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Wurzburg, Germany.
Oncotarget. 2014 Jul 15;5(13):5040-53. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2079.
Inhibition of RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is beneficial for many patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated melanoma. However, primary and secondary resistances restrict long-lasting therapy success. Combination therapies are therefore urgently needed. Here, we evaluate the cellular effect of combining a MEK inhibitor with a genotoxic apoptosis inducer. Strikingly, we observed that an activated MAPK pathway promotes in several melanoma cell lines the pro-apoptotic response to genotoxic stress, and MEK inhibition reduces intrinsic apoptosis. This goes along with MEK inhibitor induced increased RAS and P-AKT levels. The protective effect of the MEK inhibitor depends on PI3K signaling, which prevents the induction of pro-apoptotic PUMA that mediates apoptosis after DNA damage. We could show that the MEK inhibitor dependent feedback loop is enabled by several factors, including EGF receptor and members of the SPRED family. The simultaneous knockdown of SPRED1 and SPRED2 mimicked the effects of MEK inhibitor such as PUMA repression and protection from apoptosis. Our data demonstrate that MEK inhibition of BRAF(V600E)-positive melanoma cells can protect from genotoxic stress, thereby achieving the opposite of the intended anti-tumorigenic effect of the combination of MEK inhibitor with inducers of intrinsic apoptosis.
