Suppr超能文献

符合有意义使用阶段2标准认证的电子健康记录系统是否已做好互操作性准备?来自SMART C-CDA协作项目的研究结果。

Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative.

作者信息

D'Amore John D, Mandel Joshua C, Kreda David A, Swain Ashley, Koromia George A, Sundareswaran Sumesh, Alschuler Liora, Dolin Robert H, Mandl Kenneth D, Kohane Isaac S, Ramoni Rachel B

机构信息

Lantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA Diameter Health, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts, USA.

Children's Hospital Informatics Program at Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1060-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002883. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Upgrades to electronic health record (EHR) systems scheduled to be introduced in the USA in 2014 will advance document interoperability between care providers. Specifically, the second stage of the federal incentive program for EHR adoption, known as Meaningful Use, requires use of the Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) for document exchange. In an effort to examine and improve C-CDA based exchange, the SMART (Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technology) C-CDA Collaborative brought together a group of certified EHR and other health information technology vendors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the machine-readable content of collected samples for semantic correctness and consistency. This included parsing with the open-source BlueButton.js tool, testing with a validator used in EHR certification, scoring with an automated open-source tool, and manual inspection. We also conducted group and individual review sessions with participating vendors to understand their interpretation of C-CDA specifications and requirements.

RESULTS

We contacted 107 health information technology organizations and collected 91 C-CDA sample documents from 21 distinct technologies. Manual and automated document inspection led to 615 observations of errors and data expression variation across represented technologies. Based upon our analysis and vendor discussions, we identified 11 specific areas that represent relevant barriers to the interoperability of C-CDA documents.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified errors and permissible heterogeneity in C-CDA documents that will limit semantic interoperability. Our findings also point to several practical opportunities to improve C-CDA document quality and exchange in the coming years.

摘要

背景与目的

计划于2014年在美国推出的电子健康记录(EHR)系统升级将推动医疗服务提供者之间的文档互操作性。具体而言,联邦EHR采用激励计划的第二阶段,即“有意义使用”,要求使用统一临床文档架构(C-CDA)进行文档交换。为了检查和改进基于C-CDA的交换,SMART(可替代医疗应用和可重复使用技术)C-CDA协作组织召集了一群经过认证的EHR和其他健康信息技术供应商。

材料与方法

我们检查了收集样本的机器可读内容的语义正确性和一致性。这包括使用开源BlueButton.js工具进行解析、使用EHR认证中使用的验证器进行测试、使用自动化开源工具进行评分以及人工检查。我们还与参与的供应商进行了小组和个人评审会议,以了解他们对C-CDA规范和要求的理解。

结果

我们联系了107个健康信息技术组织,从21种不同技术中收集了91份C-CDA样本文件。人工和自动文档检查发现了615个跨所代表技术的错误和数据表达差异。基于我们的分析和与供应商的讨论,我们确定了11个具体领域,这些领域是C-CDA文档互操作性的相关障碍。

结论

我们发现了C-CDA文档中会限制语义互操作性的错误和允许的异质性。我们的研究结果还指出了未来几年提高C-CDA文档质量和交换的几个实际机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf4b/4215060/732c2d504ee4/amiajnl-2014-002883f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验