• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我效能感和应对方式对后天性脑损伤后生活质量和社会参与度的影响:一项为期1年的随访研究。

Influence of self-efficacy and coping on quality of life and social participation after acquired brain injury: a 1-year follow-up study.

作者信息

Brands Ingrid, Köhler Sebastian, Stapert Sven, Wade Derick, van Heugten Caroline

机构信息

Department of Neurorehabilitation, Libra Rehabilitation Medicine & Audiology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.006
PMID:24973499
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relations linking self-efficacy and coping to quality of life (QOL) and social participation and what effect self-efficacy, changes in self-efficacy, and coping style have on long-term QOL and social participation.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical cohort study.

SETTING

General hospitals, rehabilitation centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with newly acquired brain injury (ABI) (N=148) were assessed at baseline (start outpatient rehabilitation or discharge hospital/inpatient rehabilitation; mean time since injury, 15wk) and 1 year later (mean time since injury, 67wk).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

QOL was measured with the EuroQuol 5D (the EQ-5D index and the EQ-5D visual analog scale [EQ VAS]) and the 9-item Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-9), social participation with the modified Frenchay Activities Index, coping with the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, and self-efficacy with the Traumatic Brain Injury Self-efficacy Questionnaire.

RESULTS

At baseline, self-efficacy moderated the effect of emotion-oriented coping on the EQ-5D index and of avoidance coping on the EQ VAS. Self-efficacy mediated the relation between emotion-oriented coping and LiSat-9. An increase in self-efficacy over time predicted better scores on the EQ-5D index (β=.30), the EQ VAS (β=.49), and LiSat-9 (β=.44) at follow-up. In addition, higher initial self-efficacy (β=.40) predicted higher LiSat-9 scores at follow-up; higher initial emotion-oriented coping (β=-.23) predicted lower EQ VAS scores at follow-up. Higher modified Frenchay Activities Index scores at follow-up were predicted by higher self-efficacy (β=.19) and higher task-oriented coping (β=.14) at baseline (combined R(2)=5.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-efficacy and coping predict long-term QOL but seem less important in long-term social participation. High self-efficacy protects against the negative effect of emotion-oriented coping. Enhancing self-efficacy in the early stage after ABI may have beneficial long-term effects.

摘要

目的

探讨自我效能感和应对方式与生活质量(QOL)及社会参与之间的关系,以及自我效能感、自我效能感的变化和应对方式对长期生活质量和社会参与有何影响。

设计

前瞻性临床队列研究。

设置

综合医院、康复中心。

参与者

新发生脑损伤(ABI)患者(N = 148)在基线时(开始门诊康复或出院/住院康复;受伤后的平均时间为15周)和1年后(受伤后的平均时间为67周)接受评估。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ - 5D指数和EQ - 5D视觉模拟量表[EQ VAS])以及9项生活满意度问卷(LiSat - 9)测量生活质量,使用改良的Frenchay活动指数测量社会参与,使用应激情境应对量表测量应对方式,使用创伤性脑损伤自我效能量表测量自我效能感。

结果

在基线时,自我效能感调节了以情绪为导向的应对方式对EQ - 5D指数的影响以及回避应对方式对EQ VAS的影响。自我效能感介导了以情绪为导向的应对方式与LiSat - 9之间的关系。随着时间推移自我效能感的提高预测了随访时EQ - 5D指数(β = 0.30)、EQ VAS(β = 0.49)和LiSat - 9(β = 0.44)得分更高。此外,较高的初始自我效能感(β = 0.40)预测了随访时较高的LiSat - 9得分;较高的初始以情绪为导向的应对方式(β = - 0.23)预测了随访时较低的EQ VAS得分。随访时较高的改良Frenchay活动指数得分由基线时较高的自我效能感(β = 0.19)和较高的以任务为导向的应对方式(β = 0.14)预测(综合R² = 5.1%)。

结论

自我效能感和应对方式可预测长期生活质量,但在长期社会参与中似乎不太重要。高自我效能感可抵御以情绪为导向的应对方式的负面影响。在ABI后的早期提高自我效能感可能具有有益的长期效果。

相似文献

1
Influence of self-efficacy and coping on quality of life and social participation after acquired brain injury: a 1-year follow-up study.自我效能感和应对方式对后天性脑损伤后生活质量和社会参与度的影响:一项为期1年的随访研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
2
Life goal attainment in the adaptation process after acquired brain injury: the influence of self-efficacy and of flexibility and tenacity in goal pursuit.后天性脑损伤后适应过程中的生活目标达成:自我效能以及目标追求中的灵活性和坚韧度的影响。
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Jun;29(6):611-22. doi: 10.1177/0269215514549484. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Is the effect of coping styles disease specific? Relationships with emotional distress and quality of life in acquired brain injury and multiple sclerosis.应对方式的效果是否具有疾病特异性?在获得性脑损伤和多发性硬化症中与情绪困扰和生活质量的关系。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Jan;32(1):116-126. doi: 10.1177/0269215517718367. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
4
Coping styles in relation to cognitive rehabilitation and quality of life after brain injury.应对方式与脑损伤后认知康复和生活质量的关系。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Aug;20(4):587-600. doi: 10.1080/09602011003683836. Epub 2010 May 6.
5
Associations of proactive coping and self-efficacy with psychosocial outcomes in individuals after stroke.中风后个体中积极应对和自我效能与心理社会结果的关联。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8):1484-91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
6
Psychological resources, appraisals, and coping and their relationship to participation in spinal cord injury: a path analysis.心理资源、评估以及应对方式及其与脊髓损伤参与度的关系:路径分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1662-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 2.
7
How flexible is coping after acquired brain injury? A 1-year prospective study investigating coping patterns and influence of self-efficacy, executive functioning and self-awareness.获得性脑损伤后应对方式的灵活性如何?一项为期1年的前瞻性研究,调查应对模式以及自我效能感、执行功能和自我意识的影响。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Oct;46(9):869-75. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1849.
8
Social skills: a resource for more social support, lower depression levels, higher quality of life, and participation in individuals with spinal cord injury?社交技能:脊髓损伤个体获得更多社会支持、降低抑郁水平、提高生活质量及参与度的一种资源?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
9
Predictors of health-related quality of life and participation after brain injury rehabilitation: The role of neuropsychological factors.脑损伤康复后与健康相关的生活质量和参与的预测因素:神经心理学因素的作用。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017 Jun;27(4):581-598. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1113996. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
10
Coping, problem solving, depression, and health-related quality of life in patients receiving outpatient stroke rehabilitation.接受门诊卒中康复治疗患者的应对、问题解决、抑郁及健康相关生活质量
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8):1492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes and Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Work-Related Traumatic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Longitudinal Analysis of HRQoL and the EQ-VAS.与工作相关的创伤性肌肉骨骼损伤患者健康相关生活质量的变化及决定因素:健康相关生活质量和欧洲五维度健康量表视觉模拟量表的纵向分析
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10304-4.
2
"I moved from simply being to actively living." A qualitative study on peer mentorship camps for adults with acquired brain injury.“我从仅仅是生存转变为积极地生活。”一项关于为后天性脑损伤成年人设立的同伴指导营的定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2494358. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2494358. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
3
Analysis of the correlation and influencing factors between delirium, sleep, self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression in patients with traumatic brain injury: a cohort study.
创伤性脑损伤患者谵妄、睡眠、自我效能感、焦虑和抑郁之间的相关性及影响因素分析:一项队列研究
Front Neurosci. 2024 Nov 1;18:1484777. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1484777. eCollection 2024.
4
Coping Strategies in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.获得性脑损伤患者的应对策略:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):784. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080784.
5
Using hypnotic suggestion in the rehabilitation of working memory capacity after acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.使用催眠暗示对后天性脑损伤后工作记忆容量进行康复治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07867-z.
6
Cognitive Self-Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病中的认知自我效能感
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2024 Oct;44(4):625-631. doi: 10.1177/15394492231206346. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
7
The Impact of Upper Limb Apraxia on General and Domain-Specific Self-Efficacy in Post-Stroke Patients.上肢失用症对中风后患者一般自我效能感和特定领域自我效能感的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;11(16):2252. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162252.
8
Letting go or giving up? The influence of self-transcendence meaning of life on goal adjustment in high action crisis.放手还是放弃?自我超越生命意义对高行动危机中目标调整的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1054873. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1054873. eCollection 2023.
9
Using Self-Regulation Assessment to Explore Associations between Self-Regulation, Participation and Health-Related Quality of Life in a Rehabilitation Population.运用自我调节评估探索康复人群中自我调节、参与度与健康相关生活质量之间的关联。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb 7;55:jrm00369. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2531.
10
Resilience and Anxiety Among Healthcare Workers During the Spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant: A Moderated Mediation Model.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)德尔塔变异株传播期间医护人员的心理韧性与焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 16;13:804538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.804538. eCollection 2022.