Suppr超能文献

新治疗方案可提高院外心脏骤停患者的生存率:一项历史对照研究。

New treatment bundles improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a historical comparison.

作者信息

Avalli Leonello, Mauri Tommaso, Citerio Giuseppe, Migliari Maurizio, Coppo Anna, Caresani Matteo, Marcora Barbara, Rossi Gianpiera, Pesenti Antonio

机构信息

Institutions Dipartimento di Emergenza e Urgenza, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.

Institutions Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2014 Sep;85(9):1240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Before the introduction of the new international cardiac arrest treatment guidelines in 2005, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiac origin in Northern Italy had very poor prognosis. Since 2006, a new bundle of care comprising use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) was started, while extracorporeal CPR program (ECPR) for selected refractory CA and dispatcher-assisted cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started in January 2010.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that a program of bundled care might improve outcome of OHCA patients.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected in the OHCA registry of the MB area between September 2007 and August 2011 and compared this with data from 2000 to 2003.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2011, 1128 OHCAs occurred in the MB area, 745 received CPR and 461 of these had a CA of presumed cardiac origin. Of these, 125 (27%) achieved sustained ROSC, 60 (13%) survived to 1 month, of whom 51 (11%) were discharged from hospital with a good neurological outcome (CPC≤2), and 9 with a poor neurological outcome (CPC>2). Compared with data from the 2000 to 2003 periods, survival increased from 5.6% to 13.01% (p<0.0001). In the 2007-2011 group, low-flow time and bystander CPR were independent markers of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA survival has improved in our region. An increased bystander CPR rate associated with dispatcher-assisted CPR was the most significant cause of increased survival, but duration of CA remains critical for patient outcome.

摘要

引言

在2005年新的国际心脏骤停治疗指南出台之前,意大利北部院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的心脏源性患者预后很差。自2006年起,开始实施一套新的综合治疗方案,包括使用自动体外除颤器(AED)和治疗性低温(TH),而针对选定的难治性心脏骤停的体外心肺复苏(ECPR)方案和调度员辅助心肺复苏(CPR)于2010年1月启动。

目的

我们假设综合治疗方案可能会改善OHCA患者的预后。

方法

我们分析了2007年9月至2011年8月在MB地区OHCA登记处收集的数据,并将其与2000年至2003年的数据进行比较。

结果

2007年至2011年期间,MB地区发生了1128例OHCA,745例接受了CPR,其中461例为推测心脏源性心脏骤停。其中,125例(27%)实现了持续自主循环恢复(ROSC),60例(13%)存活至1个月,其中51例(11%)出院时神经功能良好(脑功能分级[CPC]≤2),9例神经功能不良(CPC>2)。与2000年至2003年期间的数据相比,生存率从5.6%提高到了13.01%(p<0.0001)。在2007 - 2011年组中,低流量时间和旁观者实施的CPR是生存的独立标志物。

结论

我们地区OHCA的生存率有所提高。旁观者CPR率的增加与调度员辅助CPR相关,是生存率提高的最主要原因,但心脏骤停持续时间对患者预后仍然至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验