• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表观扩散系数比值在两家机构对常见小儿小脑肿瘤术前诊断中的适用性。

Applicability of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors across two institutions.

作者信息

Koral Korgün, Alford Raphael, Choudhury Nabila, Mossa-Basha Mahmud, Gargan Lynn, Gimi Barjor, Gao Ang, Zhang Song, Bowers Daniel C, Koral Kadriye M, Izbudak Izlem

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, 1935 Medical District Drive, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA,

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2014 Sep;56(9):781-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1398-z. Epub 2014 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-014-1398-z
PMID:24974083
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to test the accuracy and applicability of decision rules utilizing apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios on accurate preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors across two institutions.

METHODS

In this HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study, performed at two institutions, 140 pediatric cerebellar tumors were included. Two separate reviewers placed regions of interest on the solid components of 140 tumors (98 at site A and 42 at site B) and normal brain on the ADC maps. The third reviewer who was blinded to the histopathological diagnoses made the same measurements on 140 patients to validate the data. Tumor to normal brain ADC ratios were calculated. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to generate thresholds to discriminate tumors. Utility of decision rules based on these thresholds was tested.

RESULTS

While ADC values of medulloblastomas were different between the sites, there was no difference among the ADC ratios of medulloblastomas, pilocytic astrocytomas, ependymomas, and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors between the sites. ADC ratio of ≥1.8 correctly discriminated pilocytic astrocytomas from ependymomas with a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.78. ADC ratio of <1.2 correctly discriminated ependymomas from embryonal tumors with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.83. The proposed decision rules correctly discriminated 120 of the 140 tumors (85.71%). Age ≥2 years criterion correctly sorted medulloblastomas in 84.48% of patients and age <2 years correctly distinguished atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors in 90.00% of patients with embryonal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision rules based on ADC ratios are applicable across two institutions in the accurate preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors.

摘要

引言

我们研究的目的是检验利用表观扩散系数(ADC)比值的决策规则在两个机构对常见小儿小脑肿瘤进行准确术前诊断的准确性和适用性。

方法

在这项符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)且经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的研究中,于两个机构纳入了140例小儿小脑肿瘤。两名独立的审阅者在140个肿瘤(机构A有98个,机构B有42个)的实性成分以及ADC图上的正常脑组织上放置感兴趣区。对组织病理学诊断不知情的第三位审阅者对140例患者进行相同测量以验证数据。计算肿瘤与正常脑组织的ADC比值。进行受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析以生成区分肿瘤的阈值。测试基于这些阈值的决策规则的效用。

结果

虽然两个机构间髓母细胞瘤的ADC值不同,但两个机构间髓母细胞瘤、毛细胞型星形细胞瘤、室管膜瘤和非典型畸胎样横纹肌样瘤的ADC比值并无差异。ADC比值≥1.8可正确区分毛细胞型星形细胞瘤与室管膜瘤,敏感性为0.83,特异性为0.78。ADC比值<1.2可正确区分室管膜瘤与胚胎性肿瘤,敏感性为0.87,特异性为0.83。所提出的决策规则正确区分了140个肿瘤中的120个(85.71%)。年龄≥2岁这一标准在84.48%的患者中正确区分了髓母细胞瘤,年龄<2岁在90.00%的胚胎性肿瘤患者中正确区分了非典型畸胎样横纹肌样瘤。

结论

基于ADC比值的决策规则在两个机构对常见小儿小脑肿瘤进行准确术前诊断时是适用的。

相似文献

1
Applicability of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors across two institutions.表观扩散系数比值在两家机构对常见小儿小脑肿瘤术前诊断中的适用性。
Neuroradiology. 2014 Sep;56(9):781-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1398-z. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
2
Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in distinguishing common pediatric cerebellar tumors.表观扩散系数比值在鉴别常见小儿小脑肿瘤中的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul;19(7):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
3
Apparent diffusion coefficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children.表观扩散系数在儿童小脑肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jun-Jul;27(6):1362-9.
4
Imaging characteristics of atypical teratoid-rhabdoid tumor in children compared with medulloblastoma.儿童非典型畸胎样-横纹肌样瘤与髓母细胞瘤的影像学特征比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):809-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3069.
5
Diffusion MRI improves the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors among reviewers with different experience levels.扩散加权磁共振成像(Diffusion MRI)提高了不同经验水平的阅片者对常见小儿小脑肿瘤术前诊断的准确性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;34(12):2360-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3596. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
6
Discrimination of paediatric brain tumours using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms.基于表观扩散系数直方图鉴别小儿脑肿瘤。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):447-57. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2255-7. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Common pediatric cerebellar tumors: correlation between cell densities and apparent diffusion coefficient metrics.常见小儿小脑肿瘤:细胞密度与表观扩散系数指标的相关性。
Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):532-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121362. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
8
Application of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Metrics for Differentiation of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors : A Large Retrospective Study and Brief Review of Literature.表观扩散系数直方图指标在小儿后颅窝肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用:一项大型回顾性研究及文献简要综述
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Dec;32(4):1097-1108. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01179-6. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
9
[Neuroradiological differential diagnosis in medulloblastomas and ependymomas: results of the HIT'91-study].[髓母细胞瘤和室管膜瘤的神经放射学鉴别诊断:HIT'91研究结果]
Klin Padiatr. 2002 Jul-Aug;214(4):162-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33190.
10
Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.表观扩散系数在小儿后颅窝肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用
Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Aug;35(8):448-453. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0652-9. Epub 2017 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasma lipidomics profiling to identify signatures of pediatric medulloblastoma.血浆脂质组学分析以鉴定小儿髓母细胞瘤的特征。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-04008-7.
2
Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Common Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Study.扩散加权成像在鉴别常见小儿后颅窝肿瘤中的诊断效用:一项单中心回顾性研究
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;59(6):560-566. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24154.
3
[Pediatric posterior fossa tumors].[小儿后颅窝肿瘤]

本文引用的文献

1
Metrics and textural features of MRI diffusion to improve classification of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.磁共振成像扩散的指标和纹理特征以改善小儿后颅窝肿瘤的分类
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 May;35(5):1009-15. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3784. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
2
Diffusion MRI improves the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of common pediatric cerebellar tumors among reviewers with different experience levels.扩散加权磁共振成像(Diffusion MRI)提高了不同经验水平的阅片者对常见小儿小脑肿瘤术前诊断的准确性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;34(12):2360-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3596. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
3
Common pediatric cerebellar tumors: correlation between cell densities and apparent diffusion coefficient metrics.
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023 Aug;63(8):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s00117-023-01159-y. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Retrospective cohort study assessing postoperative functional outcome, cerebellar mutism and hydrocephalus.小脑毛细胞型星形细胞瘤。评估术后功能转归、小脑缄默症和脑积水的回顾性队列研究。
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Mar 23;19:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100180. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: Diagnosis, Post-Treatment Changes, and Advanced Sequences-An Updated Review.神经肿瘤学中的扩散加权成像:诊断、治疗后变化及高级序列——最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 19;15(3):618. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030618.
6
The Diagnostic Efficiency of Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Medulloblastoma from Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.定量扩散加权成像在鉴别髓母细胞瘤与后颅窝肿瘤中的诊断效能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 15;12(11):2796. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112796.
7
MR Imaging of Pediatric Brain Tumors.小儿脑肿瘤的磁共振成像
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;12(4):961. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040961.
8
Automatic Machine Learning to Differentiate Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors on Routine MR Imaging.基于常规磁共振成像的小儿后颅窝肿瘤的自动机器学习鉴别
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jul;41(7):1279-1285. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6621.
9
Septal dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor: a comprehensive clinical, imaging, histopathologic, and molecular analysis.隔叶发育不良性神经上皮肿瘤:全面的临床、影像、组织病理学和分子分析。
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jun 10;21(6):800-808. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz037.
10
Can apparent diffusion coefficient values help distinguish between different types of pediatric brain tumors?表观扩散系数值能否有助于区分不同类型的小儿脑肿瘤?
Eur J Radiol Open. 2019 Jan 4;6:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.004. eCollection 2019.
常见小儿小脑肿瘤:细胞密度与表观扩散系数指标的相关性。
Radiology. 2013 Aug;268(2):532-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121362. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
4
Distinctive MRI features of pediatric medulloblastoma subtypes.小儿髓母细胞瘤亚型的 MRI 特征。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Apr;200(4):895-903. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9249.
5
Early clinical outcomes using proton radiation for children with central nervous system atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors.质子放疗治疗儿童中枢神经系统非典型畸胎样横纹肌样肿瘤的早期临床结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
MRI features of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors in children.儿童非典型畸胎样/横纹肌样肿瘤的 MRI 特征。
Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Aug;43(8):1001-8. doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2646-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009.CBTRUS统计报告:2005 - 2009年在美国诊断出的原发性脑和中枢神经系统肿瘤
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Nov;14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):v1-49. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos218.
8
Multi-system repeatability and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using an ice-water phantom.采用冰水模体对表观扩散系数测量的多系统重复性和可再现性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 May;37(5):1238-46. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23825. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
9
Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in distinguishing common pediatric cerebellar tumors.表观扩散系数比值在鉴别常见小儿小脑肿瘤中的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul;19(7):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
10
Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus.髓母细胞瘤的分子亚型:当前共识。
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Apr;123(4):465-72. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0922-z. Epub 2011 Dec 2.