Papp Renata, Borbas Ilona, Dobos Eva, Bredehorst Maren, Jaruseviciene Lina, Vehko Tuulikki, Balogh Sandor
National Institute of Primary Health Care, 84-88 Jász Str, Budapest 1135, Hungary.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jun 28;15:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-128.
The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness.
The focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis.
There were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness.
This study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future.
欧盟初级保健项目团队评估了爱沙尼亚、芬兰、德国、匈牙利、意大利、立陶宛和西班牙等参与国的初级保健(PHC)专业人员和患者对初级保健系统组织质量的看法。本文介绍了患者和专业人员在初级保健质量的一些主要维度上的综合意见、期望和优先事项,如可及性、公平性、适宜性和以患者为中心。
本研究采用焦点小组技术作为一种定性研究方法,以探索对医疗保健系统和卫生服务的态度。讨论的主题包括:初级保健质量的一般方面;根据双方需求接受/提供初级保健服务的可能性;初级保健服务可及性的决定因素;以患者为中心。使用主题分析方法对焦点小组讨论期间收集的数据集进行评估。
总共进行了14个焦点小组讨论:七个伙伴国家中的每个国家都有一个专业人员小组和一个患者小组。主题分析的结果沿着以下维度进行了总结:可及性与公平性、适宜性(协调性、连续性、能力和全面性)以及以患者为中心。
本研究展示了患者与初级保健互动中的看法和观点以及初级保健专业人员的意见。它是与日常实践和经验相关的标准来源。在被调查的国家中,患者和医疗保健专业人员提到的被认为是初级保健质量决定因素的标准非常相似。然而,欧盟初级保健国家之间对某些标准的看法和容忍程度有所不同。在这些不同的标准中,我们特别注意到全科医生的守门作用、护士能力的重要性以及对等待时间的接受程度。等待时间对患者满意度的影响是显而易见的;公平性和初级保健服务可及性的影响更多地取决于城乡地区医疗机构和医生的均衡分布。预计医生短缺在不久的将来将对患者满意度产生重大影响。