Westermeyer Joseph, Yoon Gihyun, Tomaska Julie, Kuskowski Michael A
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(7):1595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 May 27.
The objective of the study consisted of comparing lifetime prevalence rates and odds ratios of anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders in adopted-versus-non-adopted people in a nationally representative sample. The data were drawn from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). The main outcome measure was the prevalence of lifetime internalizing psychiatric disorders in adopted (n=378) versus non-adopted (n=42,503) individuals. Adoptees and non-adoptees were compared to estimate the odds of lifetime internalizing disorders using logistic regression analyses. Adoptees had higher prevalence rates of several lifetime mood and anxiety disorders compared with non-adoptees, with a 1.61-fold increase (95% CI 1.29-2.02) in the odds of any mood disorder and a 1.49-fold increase (95% CI 1.18-1.89) in the odds of any anxiety disorder compared with non-adoptees. Regarding specific mood and anxiety disorders, adoptees had increased odds of major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, panic disorder without agoraphobia, specific phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Disorders not differing between adoptees and non-adoptees included dysthymia, bipolar II disorder, panic disorder with agoraphobia, social phobia, and psychotic disorder. One adoption-specific risk factor was associated with lifetime mood disorder (i.e., Asian/Pacific Island). In conclusion, adoptees in a large sample from the general population had higher rates of mood and anxiety disorders compared to non-adoptees.
该研究的目的是在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,比较领养者与非领养者焦虑症、情绪障碍和精神障碍的终生患病率及比值比。数据取自全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)。主要结局指标是领养者(n = 378)与非领养者(n = 42,503)中终生内化性精神障碍的患病率。使用逻辑回归分析比较领养者和非领养者,以估计终生内化性障碍的比值。与非领养者相比,领养者几种终生情绪和焦虑障碍的患病率更高,任何情绪障碍的比值增加1.61倍(95%可信区间1.29 - 2.02),任何焦虑障碍的比值增加1.49倍(95%可信区间1.18 - 1.89)。关于特定的情绪和焦虑障碍,领养者患重度抑郁症、双相I型障碍、无广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍、特定恐惧症和广泛性焦虑障碍的比值增加。领养者和非领养者之间无差异的障碍包括心境恶劣、双相II型障碍、伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍、社交恐惧症和精神障碍。一个与领养相关的危险因素与终生情绪障碍有关(即亚洲/太平洋岛民)。总之,来自普通人群的大样本中的领养者与非领养者相比,情绪和焦虑障碍的发生率更高。