Guthrie Dawn M, Pitman Robyn, Fletcher Paula C, Hirdes John P, Stolee Paul, Poss Jeffrey W, Papaioannou Alexandra, Berg Katherine, Ezekiel Helen Janzen
Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave, W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Jun 30;14:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-81.
Across Ontario, home care professionals collect standardized information on each client using the Resident Assessment for Home Care (RAI-HC). However, this information is not consistently shared with those professionals who provide services in the client's home. In this pilot study, we examined the feasibility of sharing data, from the RAI-HC, between care coordinators and service providers.
All participants were involved in a one-day training session on the RAI-HC. The care coordinators shared specific outputs from the RAI-HC, including the embedded health index scales, with their contracted physiotherapy and occupational therapy service providers. Two focus groups were held, one with care coordinators (n = 4) and one with contracted service providers (n = 6). They were asked for their opinions on the positive aspects of the project and areas for improvement.
The focus groups revealed a number of positive outcomes related to the project including the use of a falls prevention brochure and an increased level of communication between professionals. The participants also cited multiple areas for improvement related to data sharing (e.g., time constraints, data being sent in a timely fashion) and to their standard practices in the community (e.g., busy workloads, difficulties in data sharing, duplication of assessments between professionals).
Home care professionals were able to share select pieces of information generated from the RAI-HC system and this project enhanced the level of communication between the two groups of professionals. However, a single information session was not adequate training for the rehabilitation professionals, who do not use the RAI-HC as part of normal practice. Better education, ongoing support and timely access to the RAI-HC data are some ways to improve the usefulness of this information for busy home care providers.
在安大略省,家庭护理专业人员使用家庭护理居民评估(RAI-HC)为每位客户收集标准化信息。然而,这些信息并未始终与在客户家中提供服务的专业人员共享。在这项试点研究中,我们探讨了在护理协调员和服务提供商之间共享RAI-HC数据的可行性。
所有参与者都参加了为期一天的RAI-HC培训课程。护理协调员与他们签约的物理治疗和职业治疗服务提供商分享了RAI-HC的特定输出,包括嵌入式健康指数量表。举行了两个焦点小组,一个由护理协调员组成(n = 4),另一个由签约服务提供商组成(n = 6)。他们被要求就该项目的积极方面和改进领域发表意见。
焦点小组揭示了与该项目相关的一些积极成果,包括使用预防跌倒手册以及专业人员之间沟通水平的提高。参与者还提到了与数据共享相关的多个改进领域(例如,时间限制、数据及时发送)以及他们在社区中的标准做法(例如,工作量大、数据共享困难、专业人员之间评估重复)。
家庭护理专业人员能够共享RAI-HC系统生成的部分选定信息,并且该项目提高了两组专业人员之间的沟通水平。然而,对于不将RAI-HC作为常规做法一部分的康复专业人员来说,一次信息交流会的培训并不足够。更好的教育、持续的支持以及及时获取RAI-HC数据是提高这些信息对忙碌的家庭护理提供者有用性的一些方法。