• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts.香烟警示标签对戒烟尝试影响的中介途径。
Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1410-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000056. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
2
Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Are Not Created Equal: They Can Increase or Decrease Smokers' Quit Intentions Relative to Text-Only Warnings.香烟图形警示标签并非千篇一律:相对于纯文字警示,它们可能会增加或降低吸烟者的戒烟意愿。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1155-1162. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw389.
3
How the New European Union's (Pictorial) Tobacco Health Warnings Influence Quit Attempts and Smoking Cessation: Findings from the 2016-2017 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Surveys.新欧盟(图示)烟草健康警示对戒烟尝试和戒烟的影响:来自 2016-2017 年国际烟草控制(ITC)荷兰调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 2;16(21):4260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214260.
4
How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC Four-Country survey.香烟包装健康警示的反应如何影响戒烟:国际烟草控制四国调查结果
Addiction. 2009 Apr;104(4):669-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02508.x. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
5
Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.对香烟警示标签的抵触情绪重要吗?澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国成年吸烟者对警示标签的反应及后续戒烟情况。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159245. eCollection 2016.
6
Path analysis of warning label effects on negative emotions and quit attempts: A longitudinal study of smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the US.路径分析:警示标签对负面情绪和戒烟尝试的影响——对澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥和美国吸烟者的纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
The association between exposure to point-of-sale anti-smoking warnings and smokers' interest in quitting and quit attempts: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey.销售点反吸烟警示暴露与吸烟者戒烟意愿和戒烟尝试之间的关联:来自国际烟草控制四国调查的结果。
Addiction. 2012 Feb;107(2):425-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03668.x.
8
Pictorial Warning Labels and Memory for Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time.随时间推移的香烟健康风险信息的图片警示标签和记忆
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 20;53(4):358-371. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay050.
9
Graphic Warning Labels Elicit Affective and Thoughtful Responses from Smokers: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.图形警示标签引发吸烟者的情感和深思反应:一项随机临床试验的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0142879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142879. eCollection 2015.
10
Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts.关于香烟包装上图片健康警示的人际沟通:政策相关影响及与戒烟尝试的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.042. Epub 2015 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Contingent Effects of E-Cigarette Warning Label Messages on Cognitive Elaboration and Fear Among U.S. Youth Ages 14-17 by Vaping Experience and Peer Vaping Behavior.电子烟警告标签信息对14至17岁美国青少年认知加工及恐惧的偶然影响:基于电子烟使用经历和同伴电子烟使用行为的研究
Health Commun. 2025 Jun;40(7):1257-1269. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2394260. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Self-reported attention and responses to cigarette package labels at the end of a two-week randomized trial of cigarette package labeling configurations.在一项为期两周的香烟包装标签配置随机试验结束时,自我报告的对香烟包装标签的关注及反应。
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Jun 17;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/189198. eCollection 2024.
3
Managing Fear Responses: A Qualitative Analysis of Pictorial Warning Labels Five Years Post-Plain Packaging.应对恐惧反应:对平装包装五年后的图片警示标签的定性分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 May 22;27(6):1059-1065. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae112.
4
Association between textual and pictorial warnings on tumbac (waterpipe tobacco) boxes and motivation to quit waterpipe smoking among Lebanese and Iraqi adolescents.水烟烟盒上的文字和图片警示语与黎巴嫩和伊拉克青少年戒烟意愿之间的关系。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04649-7.
5
Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial.将插入物与香烟包装上的警告标签相结合以促进戒烟:一项为期两周的随机试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Jan 1;58(1):56-66. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad052.
6
How Do Young Adult Drinkers React to Varied Alcohol Warning Formats and Contents? An Exploratory Study in France.年轻成年饮酒者对不同酒精警告形式和内容作何反应?法国的一项探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 7;20(15):6541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156541.
7
A mixed-method study of perceptions of cigarette pack inserts among adult smokers from New York and South Carolina exposed as part of a randomized controlled trial.一项在纽约和南卡罗来纳州成年吸烟者中开展的关于对香烟盒内插页认知的混合方法研究,这些吸烟者是作为一项随机对照试验的一部分而被暴露于此的。
Health Educ Res. 2023 Dec 11;38(6):548-562. doi: 10.1093/her/cyad030.
8
Perceived threat and fear responses to e-cigarette warning label messages: Results from 16 focus groups with U.S. youth and adults.对电子烟警告标签信息的感知威胁和恐惧反应:来自与美国青年和成年人的16个焦点小组的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0286806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286806. eCollection 2023.
9
The association between viewing cigarette health warning labels and intention to quit smoking among Chinese adult smokers: support for including health outcome content and culturally specific messages.观看香烟健康警示标签与中国成年吸烟者戒烟意愿之间的关联:支持包含健康后果内容和具有文化特异性的信息。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 11;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15718-4.
10
Testing the effectiveness of alcohol health warning label formats: An online experimental study with Australian adult drinkers.测试酒精健康警示标签格式的有效性:一项针对澳大利亚成年饮酒者的在线实验研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0276189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276189. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels.香烟警语标签影响的情绪和认知中介因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Mar;16(3):263-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt124. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
2
Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory.威胁性沟通:恐惧诉求理论的批判性重新分析与修正后的元分析检验
Health Psychol Rev. 2013 May;7(Suppl 1):S8-S31. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages.年轻人对香烟包装上图形警示标签的反应。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e14-22. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
4
Let's not further obscure the debate about fear appeal messages for smokers.咱们不要再进一步模糊关于针对吸烟者的恐惧诉求信息的辩论了。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):e51. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.006.
5
Desire versus efficacy in smokers' paradoxical reactions to pictorial health warnings for cigarettes.吸烟者对香烟图片健康警示的矛盾反应中,欲望与效果。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054937. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
6
Adult smokers' reactions to pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packs in Thailand and moderating effects of type of cigarette smoked: findings from the international tobacco control southeast Asia survey.泰国成年吸烟者对香烟包装上的图片健康警示标签的反应,以及吸烟类型的调节作用:国际烟草控制东南亚调查的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Aug;15(8):1339-47. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts241. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
7
Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.香烟警告标签政策选择与与吸烟相关的健康差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.025.
8
Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: a cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among Mexican smokers.将大众媒体宣传活动与香烟包装上的图形警示标签联系起来:一项评估墨西哥吸烟者中效果的横断面研究。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e57-65. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
9
Awareness and impact of New York City's graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs.纽约市图形销售点烟草健康警示标识的认知度和影响。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e51-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
10
[Towards informed tobacco consumption in Mexico: effect of pictorial warning labels in smokers].[迈向墨西哥的明智烟草消费:图片警示标签对吸烟者的影响]
Salud Publica Mex. 2012 Jun;54(3):242-53.

香烟警示标签对戒烟尝试影响的中介途径。

Mediational pathways of the impact of cigarette warning labels on quit attempts.

作者信息

Yong Hua-Hie, Borland Ron, Thrasher James F, Thompson Mary E, Nagelhout Gera E, Fong Geoffrey T, Hammond David, Cummings K Michael

机构信息

VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria.

Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1410-20. doi: 10.1037/hea0000056. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1037/hea0000056
PMID:24977309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4600667/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test and develop, using structural equation modeling, a robust model of the mediational pathways through which health warning labels exert their influence on smokers' subsequent quitting behavior.

METHOD

Data come from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey, a longitudinal cohort study conducted in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Waves 5-6 data (n = 4,988) were used to calibrate the hypothesized model of warning label impact on subsequent quit attempts via a set of policy-specific and general psychosocial mediators. The finalized model was validated using Waves 6-7 data (n = 5065).

RESULTS

As hypothesized, warning label salience was positively associated with thoughts about risks of smoking stimulated by the warnings (β = .58, p < .001), which in turn were positively related to increased worry about negative outcomes of smoking (β = .52, p < .001); increased worry in turn predicted stronger intention to quit (β = .39, p < .001), which was a strong predictor of subsequent quit attempts (β = .39, p < .001). This calibrated model was successfully replicated using Waves 6-7 data.

CONCLUSION

Health warning labels seem to influence future quitting attempts primarily through their ability to stimulate thoughts about the risks of smoking, which in turn help to raise smoking-related health concerns, which lead to stronger intentions to quit, a known key predictor of future quit attempts for smokers. By making warning labels more salient and engaging, they should have a greater chance to change behavior.

摘要

目的

运用结构方程模型来测试并建立一个稳健的中介路径模型,以探究健康警示标签对吸烟者后续戒烟行为产生影响的具体方式。

方法

数据来源于国际烟草控制四国调查,这是一项在澳大利亚、加拿大、英国和美国开展的纵向队列研究。利用第5 - 6波数据(n = 4,988),通过一组特定政策和一般心理社会中介变量,校准关于警示标签对后续戒烟尝试影响的假设模型。最终模型使用第6 - 7波数据(n = 5065)进行验证。

结果

正如所假设的那样,警示标签的显著性与因警示引发的对吸烟风险的思考呈正相关(β = 0.58,p < 0.001),而这种思考又与对吸烟负面后果担忧的增加呈正相关(β = 0.52,p < 0.001);担忧的增加进而预示着更强的戒烟意愿(β = 0.39,p < 0.001),而戒烟意愿是后续戒烟尝试的有力预测指标(β = 0.39,p < 0.001)。使用第6 - 7波数据成功复制了这个校准后的模型。

结论

健康警示标签似乎主要通过激发对吸烟风险的思考来影响未来的戒烟尝试,这反过来有助于提高与吸烟相关的健康担忧,进而导致更强的戒烟意愿,而戒烟意愿是吸烟者未来戒烟尝试的一个已知关键预测指标。通过使警示标签更加显著且引人关注,它们应该有更大机会改变行为。